[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on RequestFactoryPlusPaths in google-web-toolkit
Comment by nick.red...@gmail.com: I've made a somewhat-similar project (same goals, in a way, much different route) - which is here: http://code.google.com/p/alcina/ My comparison of the two (alcina to the gwt2.1/mvc framework) -http://code.google.com/p/alcina/wiki/ComparisonWithGwt2_1Sync - is based on gwt2.1 as it was in late June 2010, but still seems mostly valid. The Alcina project is a lot closer to Google Wave (but with transforms of a domain (JPA) object graph, not a wave) in many senses - and deals with a few things that don't seem to be targetted by gwt2.1mvc, but perhaps would be good if they were: - non-blocking (optimistic UI) client changes to the JPA graph - out-of-order requests arriving at the server (only necessary if you're non-blocking, sure) - dealing with the client JPA graph being a sub-graph of that of the server (essentially, dealing with EntityManager.merge() being basically broken) Sorry this is so late - I tried emailing some of the GWT team in June but got no response...best of luck, Nick For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactoryPlusPaths -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Development shell no longer cuts off the Launch Default Browser and Copy to Clipboard (issue758801)
Happy to. After I get back from GDD Tokyo, I should be able to do this. That won't be until the week of Oct 4th though. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:23 PM, knor...@google.com wrote: Possible to throw a screenshot comparison up on http://imgur.com/? On 2010/09/15 19:16:00, jat wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:10 PM, mailto:con...@google.com wrote: fred, i'd love to see this go in. LGTM. My objection to it as written revolves around wasting vertical space when the URL fits fine. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/758801/show -- Fred Sauer Developer Advocate Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 fre...@google.com -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Re: Cleanup for Roo-1401. Refactored the commit method so that it is easier for it (issue920801)
Thanks. done and commited as
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8868
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:09 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
LGTM
one name nit
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/920801/diff/3/3001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/client/impl/DeltaValueStoreJsonImpl.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/920801/diff/3/3001#newcode128
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/client/impl/DeltaValueStoreJsonImpl.java:128:
public void commit(JavaScriptObject returnedJso) {
Rename to something more evocative, e.g. processFuturesAndPostEvents (if
that's accurate)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/920801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
