Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com javascript: wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7: https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit- contributors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München* Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujip3Y15SsrRC5owSqA_f7aF6uEnT1FVXvTpdUXigMeMzCg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Michael Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 09:06:11 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7: https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com javascript: wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit- contributors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München* Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c7a4b31e-a355-4f13-9fe1-a4b3a6077a18%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Are you comparing prod compiles or SDM compiles? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Michael Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 09:06:11 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7: https://github.com/mgwt/ mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver- 7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contrib utors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae- 41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München* Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c7a4b31e-a355-4f13-9fe1-a4b3a6077a18%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c7a4b31e-a355-4f13-9fe1-a4b3a6077a18%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München*
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
SDM 2.6 was not incremental, it actually pruned code. If you want the same behavior in 2.7, you'll have to disable incremental compilation in SDM. This will increase compile times, but probably make the JS smaller. However, prod compiles in 2.6 vs 2.7 should have no performance regression, if anything, performance should be much better, we made lots of things faster. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:22 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Michael Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 09:06:11 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7: https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH Dienerstr. 12 80331 München Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c7a4b31e-a355-4f13-9fe1-a4b3a6077a18%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
@Daniel Sorry for my stupid question but what is the difference? How do I do prod compiles or SDM compiles? Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 10:32:39 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: Are you comparing prod compiles or SDM compiles? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com javascript: wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Michael Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 09:06:11 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7: https://github.com/mgwt/ mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver- 7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contrib utors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae- 41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München* Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c7a4b31e-a355-4f13-9fe1-a4b3a6077a18%40googlegroups.com
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
prod = production = optimized. SDM in incremental code does not do any optimizations. Normal GWT compiles optimize a lot. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: @Daniel Sorry for my stupid question but what is the difference? How do I do prod compiles or SDM compiles? Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 10:32:39 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: Are you comparing prod compiles or SDM compiles? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Michael Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 09:06:11 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7: https://github.com/mgwt/m gwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver- 7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contrib utors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b- 903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München* Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Ah okay I see what you mean. I used SDM for my test. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 11:26:08 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: prod = production = optimized. SDM in incremental code does not do any optimizations. Normal GWT compiles optimize a lot. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com javascript: wrote: @Daniel Sorry for my stupid question but what is the difference? How do I do prod compiles or SDM compiles? Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 10:32:39 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: Are you comparing prod compiles or SDM compiles? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Michael Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 09:06:11 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7: https://github.com/mgwt/m gwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap -Daniel On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:01 AM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I use iOS7 and Super dev mode as described by Daniel here http://blog.daniel-kurka.de/2012/07/mgwt-super-dev-mode.html. I use -strict -XjsInteropMode JS and output style detailed to compile the code for the PhoneGap container. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 01:02:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ray Cromwell: I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver- 7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contrib utors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b- 903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/91c19564-b5ae-41d6-a23b-903f24296a7d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Google Germany GmbH *Dienerstr. 12* *80331 München* Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
On Friday, October 31, 2014 10:22:41 AM UTC+1, confile wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Could it be that you're running out of memory? (given that SDM compiles with 2.7 are bigger than with 2.6) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/357f3df8-7ea0-4fa7-b37e-3e7ad41d6253%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Which kind of memory do you mean? Compile works fine it has -Xmx1024m. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 15:49:16 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Broyer: On Friday, October 31, 2014 10:22:41 AM UTC+1, confile wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Could it be that you're running out of memory? (given that SDM compiles with 2.7 are bigger than with 2.6) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/bee1925d-f3b9-4f7e-9701-c5a8e8e2df0f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Hi Daniel, while working with GWT 2.7RC1, GWTP and GWT-PhoneGap I found the following problem. In my application I use the REST module from GWTP. SDM works, but when I change one line to trigger a recompile I get the following error. I can be sure that there is no error in my code because when I do GWT compile there are no problems. Here is the error log: GET /recompile/mobilePhoneGapIOS Job test.mobile.MobilePhoneGapIOS_1_5 starting job: test.mobile.MobilePhoneGapIOS_1_5 binding: display.type=retina binding: mgwt.density=xhigh Compiling module test.mobile.MobilePhoneGapIOS Computing all possible rebind results for 'com.gwtplatform.mvp.client.DesktopGinjector' Rebinding com.gwtplatform.mvp.client.DesktopGinjector Invoking generator com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinjectorGenerator [ERROR] Unable to load gin module type [com.gwtplatform.dispatch.rest.client.RestGinModule], maybe you haven't compiled your client java sources? java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com$gwtplatform$dispatch$rest$client$RestGinModule at com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinBridgeClassLoader.findClass(GinBridgeClassLoader.java:150) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425) at com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinBridgeClassLoader.loadClass(GinBridgeClassLoader.java:108) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358) at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:270) at com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinjectorGenerator.loadClass(GinjectorGenerator.java:223) at com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinjectorGenerator.getPropertyModuleClasses(GinjectorGenerator.java:137) at com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinjectorGenerator.getModuleClasses(GinjectorGenerator.java:116) at com.google.gwt.inject.rebind.GinjectorGenerator.generate(GinjectorGenerator.java:72) at com.google.gwt.core.ext.IncrementalGenerator.generateNonIncrementally(IncrementalGenerator.java:40) at com.google.gwt.dev.javac.StandardGeneratorContext.runGeneratorIncrementally(StandardGeneratorContext.java:760) at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.RuleGenerateWith.realize(RuleGenerateWith.java:160) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.StandardRebindOracle$Rebinder.rebind(StandardRebindOracle.java:79) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.StandardRebindOracle.rebind(StandardRebindOracle.java:276) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.StandardRebindOracle.rebind(StandardRebindOracle.java:265) at com.google.gwt.dev.DistillerRebindPermutationOracle.getAllPossibleRebindAnswers(DistillerRebindPermutationOracle.java:87) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst$UnifyVisitor.createStaticRebindExpression(UnifyAst.java:485) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst$UnifyVisitor.createRebindExpression(UnifyAst.java:443) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst$UnifyVisitor.handleMagicMethodCall(UnifyAst.java:576) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst$UnifyVisitor.endVisit(UnifyAst.java:306) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethodCall.traverse(JMethodCall.java:248) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.traverse(JModVisitor.java:381) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:293) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:285) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.accept(JVisitor.java:128) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JCastOperation.traverse(JCastOperation.java:67) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.traverse(JModVisitor.java:381) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:293) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:285) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.accept(JVisitor.java:128) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JReturnStatement.traverse(JReturnStatement.java:40) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor$ListContext.traverse(JModVisitor.java:95) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.acceptWithInsertRemove(JModVisitor.java:351) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JBlock.traverse(JBlock.java:92) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.traverse(JModVisitor.java:381) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:293) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.accept(JVisitor.java:149) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.accept(JVisitor.java:145) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethodBody.traverse(JMethodBody.java:83) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.traverse(JModVisitor.java:381) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:293) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:285) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethod.visitChildren(JMethod.java:600) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethod.traverse(JMethod.java:569) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.traverse(JModVisitor.java:381) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:293) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:285) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.mainLoop(UnifyAst.java:1505) at
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Thomas is talking about memory on the mobile device. Safari on iOS only has about 512mb of heap to work with IIRC. You could be loading in 50-100Mb of generated JS, slowing down the mobile browser a lot. I would develop using SDM and Chrome emulation in the desktop browser, or use XCode's iOS emulator, and then when you need to test a real device, do an optimized compile. Or, if you have an Android phone, use Chrome for development, as Android devices have 2x-3x the RAM of iOS devices. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:17 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: Which kind of memory do you mean? Compile works fine it has -Xmx1024m. Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 15:49:16 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Broyer: On Friday, October 31, 2014 10:22:41 AM UTC+1, confile wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is working. In my app I have a long list with images. When I scroll down the app freezes when the scrolling reaches a point where new images have to be loaded from the server. The loading feels very slow it took more than 10 seconds. During this time the app is completely blocked. I compared the same app running in the same environment except that i switched to GWT 2.6.1. In GWT 2.6.1 it runs so mouth no blocking while scrolling. I am not sure what changed in GWT 2.7 that causes this effect, but I suppose that other people might have similar problems too. By the way I use the latest version of MGWT and GWT-PhoneGap. Could it be that you're running out of memory? (given that SDM compiles with 2.7 are bigger than with 2.6) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/bee1925d-f3b9-4f7e-9701-c5a8e8e2df0f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAPVRV7eZhZU6GNgxc8Cd8AYDaaWipdXpHdgyQNBEncbZC2-PAQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
When I use GWT 2.7RC1 with GTW-PhoneGap and run the codeserver I get the following output from the code server: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? Best Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 01:04:15 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka: Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.7.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here http://goo.gl/npqEUR. Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble. You can either reply to this thread on gwt-contrib https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/google-web-toolkit-contributors or file a bug https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/entry. We are planing to release this as GWT 2.7.0 if we do not here about any serious issues within the next two weeks. The release notes http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_7_0_RC1 for RC1 will be made available shortly after this notice, in the mean time you can take a look at the review for the release notes https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/10031/. Daniel, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/48ac86bf-3422-4472-9532-574442707f4d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c471fef0-a36d-4b55-924d-a532515cd601%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
There seems that some assertions in UnifyAST are not being satisfied in incremental SDM but it runs fine (and correctly) if you turn off assertions. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com wrote: I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project. When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...) // Lots and lots of: // Resolving ... //Found type '' // Resolving method ... Finding entry point classes Assimilating generated source Generated source files... com.google.gwt.lang.com_00046ao_00046foo_ 00046MyGwtModule_00045DEV__EntryMethodHolder Adding '1' new generated units Compiling... Compilation completed in 0.00 seconds Added 1 units to cache since last cleanup. Removing invalidated units Wrote 1 units to persistent cache. [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error java.lang.AssertionError at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1186) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1191) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1191) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1188) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
I'll give that a try... Will the issue be handled before the final release? jay On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:47:54 AM UTC-7, Roberto Lublinerman wrote: There seems that some assertions in UnifyAST are not being satisfied in incremental SDM but it runs fine (and correctly) if you turn off assertions. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com javascript: wrote: I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project. When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...) // Lots and lots of: // Resolving ... //Found type '' // Resolving method ... Finding entry point classes Assimilating generated source Generated source files... com.google.gwt.lang.com_00046ao_00046foo_ 00046MyGwtModule_00045DEV__EntryMethodHolder Adding '1' new generated units Compiling... Compilation completed in 0.00 seconds Added 1 units to cache since last cleanup. Removing invalidated units Wrote 1 units to persistent cache. [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error java.lang.AssertionError at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1186) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1191) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1191) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1188) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at
[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Yes. Will be fixed before final release. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:23 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com wrote: I'll give that a try... Will the issue be handled before the final release? jay On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:47:54 AM UTC-7, Roberto Lublinerman wrote: There seems that some assertions in UnifyAST are not being satisfied in incremental SDM but it runs fine (and correctly) if you turn off assertions. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, jay j...@thegindins.com wrote: I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project. When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...) // Lots and lots of: // Resolving ... //Found type '' // Resolving method ... Finding entry point classes Assimilating generated source Generated source files... com.google.gwt.lang.com_00046ao_00046foo_ 00046MyGwtModule_00045DEV__EntryMethodHolder Adding '1' new generated units Compiling... Compilation completed in 0.00 seconds Added 1 units to cache since last cleanup. Removing invalidated units Wrote 1 units to persistent cache. [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error java.lang.AssertionError at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1186) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1191) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1191) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java: 1188) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java: 1595) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst. java:1010) at
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
Release notes are here: http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_7_0_RC1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CA%2B%2BRBT_uQFBC4AxBZSLdrmCixZH8b0VWNfsE1PU%3DWzwdW3MdNA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
I am not aware of any changes in 2.7 that should effect performance loading images. Are you running on iOS7 or iOS8? Daniel would probably be best able to help you. Are you talking about SuperDevMode loading performance, or fully optimized compile loading performance? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: I compared my GWT-PhoneGap written in GWT 2.6.1 which switching to GWT 2.7beta. Here are my experience. I feel that loading of data especially images are much slower in GWT 2.7 than in GWT 2.6.1. I tested it on an iPhone 5. Due to the delay in loading the app feels slow and scrolling does not work smouth. Michael Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:37:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jens: Turning off precompile in incremental mode. Super Dev Mode starting up workDir: /var/folders/xh/1xkfq26532j97q23qw5pdhs4gn/T/gwt-codeserver-7573159147938212004.tmp Does this mean anything? Is it a problem if precompile is turned off or does it mean that incremental compile is not working? That's fine. Precompilation is turned off intentionally as it can sometimes cause SDM to not detect just a single permutation. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9574bc95-abd7-4c08-bf6d-58f20c2fa6f3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAPVRV7dXFx1SYtYRLCJCe0V%3DBu%3Du3B6_VXe1jN5thhFOAE8OnA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available
I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project. When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...) // Lots and lots of: // Resolving ... //Found type '' // Resolving method ... Finding entry point classes Assimilating generated source Generated source files... com.google.gwt.lang. com_00046ao_00046foo_00046MyGwtModule_00045DEV__EntryMethodHolder Adding '1' new generated units Compiling... Compilation completed in 0.00 seconds Added 1 units to cache since last cleanup. Removing invalidated units Wrote 1 units to persistent cache. [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error java.lang.AssertionError at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1407) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.instantiate(UnifyAst.java:1414) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1186 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1191 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1226) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1191 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1733) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1747) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.flowInto(UnifyAst.java:1206) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.fullFlowIntoType(UnifyAst.java:1188 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1020) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.resolveType(UnifyAst.java:1552) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.assimilateSourceUnit(UnifyAst.java: 1010) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.internalFindType(UnifyAst.java:1595 ) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1653) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.UnifyAst.translate(UnifyAst.java:1645) at
