Re: [Gossip] data transfer status

2002-09-17 Thread Kir Kolyshkin

Jeff Breidenbach wrote:

 There are still some network details and configuration still left to
 do on the new machine, including:
 
  Mail Transfer Agent [exim]

Can you please emphasize on why have you choosen exim?


-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ICQ7551596  [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
   Guinness a Day Keeps a Doctor Away (people's wisdom)

___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip



Re: [Gossip] data transfer status

2002-09-17 Thread Earl Hood

On September 17, 2002 at 13:13, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:

 Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
 
  There are still some network details and configuration still left to
  do on the new machine, including:
  
   Mail Transfer Agent [exim]
 
 Can you please emphasize on why have you choosen exim?

If you are just curious why something like sendmail is not used,
I think any choice of software is a matter of what best fits the
needs you have.  My guess on why Jeff goes with exim is that it is
lighter weight than sendmail and is purported to be easier to configure
than sendmail.  Some also say that exim has better anti-spam support.

--ewh

___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip



Re: [Gossip] data transfer status

2002-09-17 Thread Jeff Breidenbach

Also, Exim is the default mail transfer agent for Debian and has
served mail-archive pretty much flawlessly for the last 4 years.

-Jeff

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 09:31, Earl Hood wrote:
 On September 17, 2002 at 13:13, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
 
  Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
  
   There are still some network details and configuration still left to
   do on the new machine, including:
   
Mail Transfer Agent [exim]
  
  Can you please emphasize on why have you choosen exim?
 
 If you are just curious why something like sendmail is not used,
 I think any choice of software is a matter of what best fits the
 needs you have.  My guess on why Jeff goes with exim is that it is
 lighter weight than sendmail and is purported to be easier to configure
 than sendmail.  Some also say that exim has better anti-spam support.



___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip



[Gossip] data transfer status

2002-09-16 Thread Jeff Breidenbach


Hi all,

Essentially all the data has tranferred between the old and new
hardware. I'm now running a shadow; both the new computer and the old
computer are crunching away. I'm going to monitor for some time then
eventually do a spontaneous switchover.

Also, I've fed the many hundred thousand queued mails over the past
two months to the new machine, and am curious how quickly it will burn
through. You won't see the results until switchover, but I can, and it
is going quite fast.

There are still some network details and configuration still left to
do on the new machine, including:

 Mail Transfer Agent [exim]
 Web Server [apache]
 DNS [bind]
 List Server (for gossip) [mailman]
 Web Logging [analog]
 FAQ update

I've taken care of everything that needed to be done to get data
transferred and processing, including some minor tweaks to the
mail-archive core control software and system event logging. Overall,
things are going well.

Cheers,
Jeff

PS. 90-day inactive mailing lists alphabetically below asp 
have been deleted on the legacy machine. They will reappear on
switchover.


___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip