[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #344: TODO: move high priority incubated modules into main
#344: TODO: move high priority incubated modules into main
--+-
Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: 6.4.0
Component: default | Version: svn-develbranch6
Resolution: |Keywords:
Platform: All | Cpu: All
--+-
Comment (by hamish):
update:
{{{
r.sun2, r.horizon added.
v.buffer2, v.parallel2, v.delaunay2 added.
r.watershed.fast merged.
d.frame.split, r.colors.stddev, v.colors added.
v.out.gpsbabel added.
r.viewshed: code not ready yet?
}}}
TODO high priority:
- v.out.ascii.db - v.out.ascii C code
TODO lower priority:
- r.pack rewrite using method similar to r.convert (#84) + tar.gzip
- put together a quick v.to.3d wrapper script
--
Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/344#comment:10
GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] 6.4rc1
http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_6.4_Feature_Plan * d.frame.split? * r.colors.stddev? * v.colors? Yes, please v.colors - no opinion on the others. I added them all. d.frame.split: added as d.split.frame in 6.4 (only) as a replacement to d.split. (for posterity's sake it's nice to have a more useful d.split for xmons; didn't just expand that as option list was incompatible) Curious about a grass 7 version using python and FRAME enviro var, but I don't know much about either of those yet. r.colors.stddev: the stand-out feature of this script is for differences maps- it lets you tie the center of the colors scale at zero, even if +/- sides are not balanced. Hamish ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #388: *.tcl installed as executable
#388: *.tcl installed as executable ---+ Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: 6.4.0 Component: Installation | Version: svn-develbranch6 Keywords: build install |Platform: Linux Cpu: Unspecified| ---+ Hi, browsing through the Debian lintian package report for grass 6.2.3 I notice that the .tcl files installed in $(ETC)/dm/,gm/ are incorrectly given an executable bit in the file system. http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-grass- [EMAIL PROTECTED] some Makefile magic required.. Hamish -- Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/388 GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #388: *.tcl installed as executable
#388: *.tcl installed as executable ---+ Reporter: hamish| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect| Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: 6.4.0 Component: Installation | Version: svn-develbranch6 Resolution:|Keywords: build install Platform: Linux | Cpu: Unspecified ---+ Comment (by glynn): Replying to [ticket:388 hamish]: browsing through the Debian lintian package report for grass 6.2.3 I notice that the .tcl files installed in $(ETC)/dm/,gm/ are incorrectly given an executable bit in the file system. some Makefile magic required.. I've changed gis.m/Makefile from $(INSTALL) to $(INSTALL_DATA) in r34721. tksys.tcl is an executable script, so I explicitly added execute permission for that file. d.m would need something similar, if we're going to keep it. Is there any reason to? Does it still work? -- Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/388#comment:1 GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #388: *.tcl installed as executable
#388: *.tcl installed as executable ---+ Reporter: hamish| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect| Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: 6.4.0 Component: Installation | Version: svn-develbranch6 Resolution:|Keywords: build install Platform: Linux | Cpu: Unspecified ---+ Comment (by hamish): Replying to [comment:1 glynn]: I've changed gis.m/Makefile from $(INSTALL) to $(INSTALL_DATA) in r34721. tksys.tcl is an executable script, so I explicitly added execute permission for that file. thanks. d.m would need something similar, if we're going to keep it. Is there any reason to? Apparently some people prefer it. All the g.gui and init.sh stuff is set up to handle it well in a mixed environment; it doesn't hurt anything; and has taken minimal effort to maintain. So I'd say there's no reason to remove it. Does it still work? yes, it works fine. Hamish -- Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/388#comment:2 GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #72: PNG driver: boundary rendering is off by one pixel
#72: PNG driver: boundary rendering is off by one pixel --+- Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker | Milestone: 6.4.0 Component: default | Version: svn-develbranch6 Resolution: |Keywords: d.vect, rendering, PNG_DRIVER Platform: Unspecified | Cpu: Unspecified --+- Comment (by hamish): Replying to [comment:14 hamish]: I ran some 'd.vect rend=' tests with the latest 6.4svn (w/ Polygon.c commit). screenshots scripts here: http://bambi/hamish/grass/bugs/d.vect/dec2008/ ahem, http://bambi.otago.ac.nz/hamish/grass/bugs/d.vect/dec2008/ 'd.vect rend=g' seems to work ok with the PNG driver, due to thicker lines which cover up any gaps (trade one problem for another). Hamish -- Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/72#comment:15 GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #72: PNG driver: boundary rendering is off by one pixel
#72: PNG driver: boundary rendering is off by one pixel --+- Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker | Milestone: 6.4.0 Component: default | Version: svn-develbranch6 Resolution: |Keywords: d.vect, rendering, PNG_DRIVER Platform: Unspecified | Cpu: Unspecified --+- Comment (by hamish): ... another thing I noticed in those screenshots is that 'd.text size=5' (percent) is different between 6.3.0 and 6.4svn for the same frame size. shrug. and of course width=2 covers up minor sins. Hamish -- Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/72#comment:16 GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
