Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC idea: v.in.osm enhancement

2017-01-27 Thread Helmut Kudrnovsky 
Luca Delucchi wrote
> On 25 January 2017 at 10:36, Martin Landa 

> landa.martin@

>  wrote:
>> 2017-01-25 10:31 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi 

> lucadeluge@

> :
>>> no, the new v.in.osm support PBF but more improving could be done. I
>>> will modify the idea...
>>
>> thanks, Ma
> 
> I read better the proposal, is still valid instead is possible to read
> pbf/osm file only using osm2pgsql but the proposal would like to have
> different backend options

sorry, don't understand right above.

from the proposal:

"Until now a script, called v.in.osm, exists, but it is able to import data
only from a PostgreSQL database after using ​osm2pgsql to convert OSM format
to PostgreSQL/PostGIS.This project has to implement the capabilities to
import directly the .osm or .pbf format."

.pbf format can already be read. 

see the manual: https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/manuals/addons/v.in.osm.html

EXAMPLES
Import from PostgreSQL DB:

v.in.osm input="PG:host=localhost dbname=gis user=ostepok"
table=planet_osm_line \
 type=point,line output=roads where="highway is not null" 

Import from OSM PBF file:

v.in.osm input=saarland-latest.osm.pbf table=lines type=point,line
output=roads \
 where="highway is not null"

so maybe the gsoc proposal has to be adapted to extended backend support.



-
best regards
Helmut
--
View this message in context: 
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GSoC-idea-v-in-osm-enhancement-tp5304492p5305136.html
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC idea: v.in.osm enhancement

2017-01-27 Thread Luca Delucchi 
On 25 January 2017 at 10:36, Martin Landa  wrote:
> 2017-01-25 10:31 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
>> no, the new v.in.osm support PBF but more improving could be done. I
>> will modify the idea...
>
> thanks, Ma

I read better the proposal, is still valid instead is possible to read
pbf/osm file only using osm2pgsql but the proposal would like to have
different backend options

-- 
ciao
Luca

www.lucadelu.org
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC idea: v.in.osm enhancement

2017-01-25 Thread Martin Landa 
2017-01-25 10:31 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
> no, the new v.in.osm support PBF but more improving could be done. I
> will modify the idea...

thanks, Ma

-- 
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC idea: v.in.osm enhancement

2017-01-25 Thread Luca Delucchi 
On 25 January 2017 at 10:25, Martin Landa  wrote:
> Hi,
>

Hi,

> 2017-01-24 16:30 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
>> Probably the proposal was written before the addons ;-)
>
> so, should we remove this idea? Ma
>

no, the new v.in.osm support PBF but more improving could be done. I
will modify the idea...

-- 
ciao
Luca

www.lucadelu.org
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC idea: v.in.osm enhancement

2017-01-25 Thread Martin Landa 
Hi,

2017-01-24 16:30 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
> Probably the proposal was written before the addons ;-)

so, should we remove this idea? Ma

-- 
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC idea: v.in.osm enhancement

2017-01-24 Thread Luca Delucchi 
On 23 January 2017 at 16:52, Helmut Kudrnovsky  wrote:
> hi,
>

Hi,

> just read in https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2017#v.in.osmenhancement
>
> "Until now a script, called v.in.osm, exists, but it is able to import data
> only from a PostgreSQL database after using osm2pgsql to convert OSM format
> to PostgreSQL/PostGIS. This project has to implement the capabilities to
> import directly the .osm or .pbf format."
>
> just see the example
> https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/manuals/addons/v.in.osm.html
>
>  Import from OSM PBF file:
>
> v.in.osm input=saarland-latest.osm.pbf table=lines type=point,line
> output=roads \
>  where="highway is not null"
>
> so it seems v.in.osm is already able to read pbf-files.
>
> ?
>

Probably the proposal was written before the addons ;-)


-- 
ciao
Luca

www.lucadelu.org
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

[GRASS-dev] GSoC idea: v.in.osm enhancement

2017-01-23 Thread Helmut Kudrnovsky 
hi,

just read in https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2017#v.in.osmenhancement

"Until now a script, called v.in.osm, exists, but it is able to import data
only from a PostgreSQL database after using ​osm2pgsql to convert OSM format
to PostgreSQL/PostGIS. This project has to implement the capabilities to
import directly the .osm or .pbf format."

just see the example
https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/manuals/addons/v.in.osm.html

 Import from OSM PBF file:

v.in.osm input=saarland-latest.osm.pbf table=lines type=point,line
output=roads \
 where="highway is not null"

so it seems v.in.osm is already able to read pbf-files.

?





-
best regards
Helmut
--
View this message in context: 
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GSoC-idea-v-in-osm-enhancement-tp5304492.html
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev