Re: [GRASS-dev] Merging PRs

2019-07-12 Thread Helmut Kudrnovsky
>Any opinions on merging PRs related to MS Windows builds to .>master without
testing by another person?

more description why the changes and more testing before merging is welcome. 

it seems there is some windows dll hell issue at the moment which should be
solved before the PRs can be tested. further some of the related winGRASS
tickets are labelled als fixes, thus more description  why again changes are
welcome. 






-
best regards
Helmut
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-Dev-f3991897.html
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] Merging PRs

2019-07-12 Thread Markus Metz
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 4:23 PM Huidae Cho  wrote:
>
> Greetings Developers,
>
> In https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/HowToGit, it is not clear who is
responsible for merging PRs when. Are individual core developers encouraged
(allowed?) or discouraged to merge them? I'm talking about core, not
addons. How does it work?
>
> The main reason why I ask this question is because merging PRs into the
upstream master takes time and I cannot wait until that happens (who,
when?) to compile all my PRs into one build.
>
> If you create multiple branches off of master and create PRs, it wouldn't
be easy to keep track of all those individual branches in one place and
compile the personal "latest" version until the PRs get merged. For example,
>
> 1. master => feature1
> 2. master => feature2
>
> Compiling feature1 and feature2 branches would only give me feature1 and
feature2, respectively, but not both. Should I do something like this?
>
> 1. master => feature1
> 2. feature1 => feature2
>
> Then, how can we make sure that there won't be any conflicts between my
feature2 (<= feature1) branch and the OSGeo master?
>
> Not sure if what I'm doing is "right," but I'm doing this:
>
> 1. create a personal master branch "hcho" (yes, my name)
> 2. master => feature1
> 3. master => feature2
> 4. merge feature1 and feature2 into "hcho"
> 5. compile "hcho"
>
> To be honest, it's a lot of work :-(. Any suggestions or hints would be
very welcome.

Yes, I agree, this is a lot of work. git is convenient for contributors,
but a lot of work (much more than with svn) for maintainers.

If your PRs are incremental, i.e PR for feature 2 requires PR for feature
1, it would be easier to have only one PR with several commits.

I tend to merge your PRs related to MS Windows builds, but I can not test.
OTOH, testing by others occurs more likely if the changes are in master,
not in a PR.

Any opinions on merging PRs related to MS Windows builds to master without
testing by another person?

Markus M
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

[GRASS-dev] Merging PRs

2019-07-12 Thread Huidae Cho
Greetings Developers,

In https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/HowToGit, it is not clear who is
responsible for merging PRs when. Are individual core developers encouraged
(allowed?) or discouraged to merge them? I'm talking about core, not
addons. How does it work?

The main reason why I ask this question is because merging PRs into the
upstream master takes time and I cannot wait until that happens (who,
when?) to compile all my PRs into one build.

If you create multiple branches off of master and create PRs, it wouldn't
be easy to keep track of all those individual branches in one place and
compile the personal "latest" version until the PRs get merged. For example,

1. master => feature1
2. master => feature2

Compiling feature1 and feature2 branches would only give me feature1 and
feature2, respectively, but not both. Should I do something like this?

1. master => feature1
2. feature1 => feature2

Then, how can we make sure that there won't be any conflicts between my
feature2 (<= feature1) branch and the OSGeo master?

Not sure if what I'm doing is "right," but I'm doing this:

1. create a personal master branch "hcho" (yes, my name)
2. master => feature1
3. master => feature2
4. merge feature1 and feature2 into "hcho"
5. compile "hcho"

To be honest, it's a lot of work :-(. Any suggestions or hints would be
very welcome.

Best Regards,
Huidae
-- 
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev