Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Margherita Di Leo
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi,

 2015-06-22 16:32 GMT+02:00 Margherita Di Leo direg...@gmail.com:
  (known)
  https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2014/MetadataForGRASS#TODOIDEAS

 probably should be moved (merged) to

 https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2015/ImprovedMetadata

  http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

I would keep the two pages separated for historical reasons (two GSoC
projects in two different years) but I suggest to cross link the two pages
and move the todo list to the new one. Maybe also to file a bug request for
each task?


-- 
Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Margherita Di Leo
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Margherita Di Leo direg...@gmail.com
wrote:



 On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi,

 2015-06-22 16:32 GMT+02:00 Margherita Di Leo direg...@gmail.com:
  (known)
  https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2014/MetadataForGRASS#TODOIDEAS

 probably should be moved (merged) to

 https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2015/ImprovedMetadata

  http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

 I would keep the two pages separated for historical reasons (two GSoC
 projects in two different years) but I suggest to cross link the two pages
 and move the todo list to the new one. Maybe also to file a bug request for
 each task?

 whereas I suppose the stable documentation should eventually land on the
(same as last year project) wiki page
http://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/ISO/INSPIRE_Metadata_Support



-- 
Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

[GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Moritz Lennert

Hi Matej,

Thank you for the updates.

I have one question concerning the metadata templates: do I understand 
correctly that by default, neither the basic, nor the inspire template 
contain a reference to the projection system ?


IIUC, INSPIRE currently does not impose this, but I don't really 
understand how such basic information can be missing from the metadata. 
What help is the bounding box info, if we don't know in which CRS it is ?


But maybe I'm just missing something...

Moritz

On 21/06/15 21:04, Matej Krejci wrote:

Hi,
below is my report for Improved metadata for GRASS GIS project.

1) What do I have completed this week?

  * I have finished support of metada for temporal framework.

2) What am I going to achieve for next week?

  * Testing, debugging temporal metadata management
  * To make smome improvements for temporal metadata management
  * Main plan for next week is to start with designing pycsw catalogue
browser

3) Is there any blocking issue?

  * I spent more time than I expected with ISO 19108 documentation



___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Margherita Di Leo
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Moritz Lennert 
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:

 Hi Matej,

 Thank you for the updates.

 I have one question concerning the metadata templates: do I understand
 correctly that by default, neither the basic, nor the inspire template
 contain a reference to the projection system ?

 IIUC, INSPIRE currently does not impose this, but I don't really
 understand how such basic information can be missing from the metadata.
 What help is the bounding box info, if we don't know in which CRS it is ?


I agree that it sounds strange, however the bounding box is given in
geographic (unprojected) coordinates, and the ISO 19115:2003, where the
GeographicBoundingBox comes from, reads (B.3.2.1): geographic position of
the dataset NOTE This is only an approximate reference so specifying the
coordinate reference system is unnecessary 


-- 
Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Newcomb, Doug
Most of the local implementations of best practices for metadata that I
have seen include projection information.  Where I work, there are 6
possible projections that are commonly used.

Doug

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Moritz Lennert 
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:

 Hi Matej,

 Thank you for the updates.

 I have one question concerning the metadata templates: do I understand
 correctly that by default, neither the basic, nor the inspire template
 contain a reference to the projection system ?

 IIUC, INSPIRE currently does not impose this, but I don't really
 understand how such basic information can be missing from the metadata.
 What help is the bounding box info, if we don't know in which CRS it is ?

 But maybe I'm just missing something...

 Moritz

 On 21/06/15 21:04, Matej Krejci wrote:

 Hi,
 below is my report for Improved metadata for GRASS GIS project.

 1) What do I have completed this week?

   * I have finished support of metada for temporal framework.

 2) What am I going to achieve for next week?

   * Testing, debugging temporal metadata management
   * To make smome improvements for temporal metadata management
   * Main plan for next week is to start with designing pycsw catalogue
 browser

 3) Is there any blocking issue?

   * I spent more time than I expected with ISO 19108 documentation



 ___
 grass-dev mailing list
 grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev




-- 
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newc...@fws.gov
-
The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
Interior.   Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Martin Landa
Hi,

2015-06-22 16:32 GMT+02:00 Margherita Di Leo direg...@gmail.com:
 (known)
 https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2014/MetadataForGRASS#TODOIDEAS

probably should be moved (merged) to

https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2015/ImprovedMetadata

?

Ma

-- 
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Margherita Di Leo
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Moritz Lennert 
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:

 On 22/06/15 15:40, Margherita Di Leo wrote:

 Hi,

 On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Moritz Lennert
 mlenn...@club.worldonline.be mailto:mlenn...@club.worldonline.be
 wrote:

 Hi Matej,

 Thank you for the updates.

 I have one question concerning the metadata templates: do I
 understand correctly that by default, neither the basic, nor the
 inspire template contain a reference to the projection system ?

 IIUC, INSPIRE currently does not impose this, but I don't really
 understand how such basic information can be missing from the
 metadata. What help is the bounding box info, if we don't know in
 which CRS it is ?


 I agree that it sounds strange, however the bounding box is given in
 geographic (unprojected) coordinates, and the ISO 19115:2003, where the
 GeographicBoundingBox comes from, reads (B.3.2.1): geographic position
 of the dataset NOTE This is only an approximate reference so specifying
 the coordinate reference system is unnecessary 


 Using g.gui.metadata on the hospitals map in nc_spm_08, I get:

   gmd:extent
 gmd:EX_Extent
 gmd:geographicElement
 gmd:EX_GeographicBoundingBox
 gmd:westBoundLongitude
 gco:Decimal308097.937400562/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:westBoundLongitude
 gmd:eastBoundLongitude
 gco:Decimal20235.5644005626/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:eastBoundLongitude
 gmd:southBoundLatitude
 gco:Decimal914347.8748615/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:southBoundLatitude
 gmd:northBoundLatitude
 gco:Decimal156998.1718615/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:northBoundLatitude
 /gmd:EX_GeographicBoundingBox
 /gmd:geographicElement
 /gmd:EX_Extent
 /gmd:extent

 Looks like projected coordinates to me...


I would say this is a bug.



-- 
Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Margherita Di Leo
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Margherita Di Leo direg...@gmail.com
wrote:



 On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Moritz Lennert 
 mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:

 On 22/06/15 15:40, Margherita Di Leo wrote:

 Hi,

 On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Moritz Lennert
 mlenn...@club.worldonline.be mailto:mlenn...@club.worldonline.be
 wrote:

 Hi Matej,

 Thank you for the updates.

 I have one question concerning the metadata templates: do I
 understand correctly that by default, neither the basic, nor the
 inspire template contain a reference to the projection system ?

 IIUC, INSPIRE currently does not impose this, but I don't really
 understand how such basic information can be missing from the
 metadata. What help is the bounding box info, if we don't know in
 which CRS it is ?


 I agree that it sounds strange, however the bounding box is given in
 geographic (unprojected) coordinates, and the ISO 19115:2003, where the
 GeographicBoundingBox comes from, reads (B.3.2.1): geographic position
 of the dataset NOTE This is only an approximate reference so specifying
 the coordinate reference system is unnecessary 


 Using g.gui.metadata on the hospitals map in nc_spm_08, I get:

   gmd:extent
 gmd:EX_Extent
 gmd:geographicElement
 gmd:EX_GeographicBoundingBox
 gmd:westBoundLongitude

 gco:Decimal308097.937400562/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:westBoundLongitude
 gmd:eastBoundLongitude

 gco:Decimal20235.5644005626/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:eastBoundLongitude
 gmd:southBoundLatitude
 gco:Decimal914347.8748615/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:southBoundLatitude
 gmd:northBoundLatitude
 gco:Decimal156998.1718615/gco:Decimal
 /gmd:northBoundLatitude
 /gmd:EX_GeographicBoundingBox
 /gmd:geographicElement
 /gmd:EX_Extent
 /gmd:extent

 Looks like projected coordinates to me...


 I would say this is a bug.


(known)
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2014/MetadataForGRASS#TODOIDEAS


-- 
Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] projection system in metadata [was: Re: GSoC 2015 Improved metada for GRASS GIS week 4]

2015-06-22 Thread Moritz Lennert

On 22/06/15 15:40, Margherita Di Leo wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be mailto:mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:

Hi Matej,

Thank you for the updates.

I have one question concerning the metadata templates: do I
understand correctly that by default, neither the basic, nor the
inspire template contain a reference to the projection system ?

IIUC, INSPIRE currently does not impose this, but I don't really
understand how such basic information can be missing from the
metadata. What help is the bounding box info, if we don't know in
which CRS it is ?


I agree that it sounds strange, however the bounding box is given in
geographic (unprojected) coordinates, and the ISO 19115:2003, where the
GeographicBoundingBox comes from, reads (B.3.2.1): geographic position
of the dataset NOTE This is only an approximate reference so specifying
the coordinate reference system is unnecessary 


Using g.gui.metadata on the hospitals map in nc_spm_08, I get:

  gmd:extent
gmd:EX_Extent
gmd:geographicElement
gmd:EX_GeographicBoundingBox
gmd:westBoundLongitude
gco:Decimal308097.937400562/gco:Decimal
/gmd:westBoundLongitude
gmd:eastBoundLongitude
gco:Decimal20235.5644005626/gco:Decimal
/gmd:eastBoundLongitude
gmd:southBoundLatitude
gco:Decimal914347.8748615/gco:Decimal
/gmd:southBoundLatitude
gmd:northBoundLatitude
gco:Decimal156998.1718615/gco:Decimal
/gmd:northBoundLatitude
/gmd:EX_GeographicBoundingBox
/gmd:geographicElement
/gmd:EX_Extent
/gmd:extent

Looks like projected coordinates to me...

Moritz
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev