Re: R: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS
On 03/03/08 10:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moritz, what release of TCL? I don't know. I have never tried with anything else but 8.4. Moritz Marco *Da:* Moritz Lennert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Inviato:* dom 02/03/2008 20.47 *A:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* 'Benjamin Ducke'; 'GRASS Developer Mailing List' *Oggetto:* Re: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS On 01/03/08 22:14, Marco Pasetti wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > >> Why use ActiveTcl? The regular, GPL'd Tcl compiles without any problems and > can be distributed freely. > > Good question! When I planned the work I dind't considered this option, > because on the wiki it was (it is) suggested to use ActiveTcl; > Probably I should reconsider to build Tcl/Tk from source using MinGW, and > then rebuild GRASS... > > Moritz, what do you think about? Go ahead for GPL'd tcl/tk. Moritz ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
R: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS
Moritz, what release of TCL? Marco Da: Moritz Lennert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: dom 02/03/2008 20.47 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Benjamin Ducke'; 'GRASS Developer Mailing List' Oggetto: Re: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS On 01/03/08 22:14, Marco Pasetti wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > >> Why use ActiveTcl? The regular, GPL'd Tcl compiles without any problems and > can be distributed freely. > > Good question! When I planned the work I dind't considered this option, > because on the wiki it was (it is) suggested to use ActiveTcl; > Probably I should reconsider to build Tcl/Tk from source using MinGW, and > then rebuild GRASS... > > Moritz, what do you think about? Go ahead for GPL'd tcl/tk. Moritz ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
R: R: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS
OK PS: Expat is for XML Marco -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Benjamin Ducke Inviato: sabato 1 marzo 2008 21.40 Cc: 'GRASS Developer Mailing List' Oggetto: Re: R: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS Marco Pasetti wrote: > Hi, > >> maybe it would be better, or at least to make note like "this package >> is > required for GRASS compilation", etc. > > Ok. I'll do that later, before to release the final version. > > What about GEOS, GSL and Expat? Actually, GRASS uses none of them, but > GDAL uses GEOS, I'm not sure if it uses GSL (even if I think not) and > it would Only QGIS uses GSL for the georeferencer plugin. > use Expat ...if I could be able to enable that support in GDAL :-) For what? > > So, summarizing, for the GRASS guide only, should I remove GSL, Expat > and GEOS or leave only GEOS? Only GEOS seems to make sense to me. Benjamin > > Marco > > -Messaggio originale- > Da: Martin Landa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: sabato 1 marzo 2008 14.44 > A: Marco Pasetti > Cc: GRASS Developer Mailing List > Oggetto: Re: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS > > Hi, > > 2008/3/1, Marco Pasetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Related to this (the guide): what do you think about keeping GRASS + >> Quantum GIS building guide together? Actually some things (like >> expat, geos and gsl) are not needed by GRASS, but they are for QGIS. >> Should I prepare two different documents, one for GRASS only and one >> for both GRASS and QGIS > > maybe it would be better, or at least to make note like "this package > is required for GRASS compilation", etc. > > Martin > > -- > Martin Landa * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa > * > > ___ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > > -- Benjamin Ducke, M.A. Archäoinformatik (Archaeoinformation Science) Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte (Inst. of Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology) Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Johanna-Mestorf-Straße 2-6 D 24098 Kiel Germany Tel.: ++49 (0)431 880-3378 / -3379 Fax : ++49 (0)431 880-7300 www.uni-kiel.de/ufg ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: R: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS
Marco Pasetti wrote: Hi, maybe it would be better, or at least to make note like "this package is required for GRASS compilation", etc. Ok. I'll do that later, before to release the final version. What about GEOS, GSL and Expat? Actually, GRASS uses none of them, but GDAL uses GEOS, I'm not sure if it uses GSL (even if I think not) and it would Only QGIS uses GSL for the georeferencer plugin. use Expat ...if I could be able to enable that support in GDAL :-) For what? So, summarizing, for the GRASS guide only, should I remove GSL, Expat and GEOS or leave only GEOS? Only GEOS seems to make sense to me. Benjamin Marco -Messaggio originale- Da: Martin Landa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: sabato 1 marzo 2008 14.44 A: Marco Pasetti Cc: GRASS Developer Mailing List Oggetto: Re: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS Hi, 2008/3/1, Marco Pasetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Related to this (the guide): what do you think about keeping GRASS + Quantum GIS building guide together? Actually some things (like expat, geos and gsl) are not needed by GRASS, but they are for QGIS. Should I prepare two different documents, one for GRASS only and one for both GRASS and QGIS maybe it would be better, or at least to make note like "this package is required for GRASS compilation", etc. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev -- Benjamin Ducke, M.A. Archäoinformatik (Archaeoinformation Science) Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte (Inst. of Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology) Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Johanna-Mestorf-Straße 2-6 D 24098 Kiel Germany Tel.: ++49 (0)431 880-3378 / -3379 Fax : ++49 (0)431 880-7300 www.uni-kiel.de/ufg ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
R: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS
Hi, >maybe it would be better, or at least to make note like "this package is required for GRASS compilation", etc. Ok. I'll do that later, before to release the final version. What about GEOS, GSL and Expat? Actually, GRASS uses none of them, but GDAL uses GEOS, I'm not sure if it uses GSL (even if I think not) and it would use Expat ...if I could be able to enable that support in GDAL :-) So, summarizing, for the GRASS guide only, should I remove GSL, Expat and GEOS or leave only GEOS? Marco -Messaggio originale- Da: Martin Landa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: sabato 1 marzo 2008 14.44 A: Marco Pasetti Cc: GRASS Developer Mailing List Oggetto: Re: R: [GRASS-dev] New Binary Package Project for winGRASS Hi, 2008/3/1, Marco Pasetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Related to this (the guide): what do you think about keeping GRASS + > Quantum GIS building guide together? Actually some things (like > expat, geos and gsl) are not needed by GRASS, but they are for QGIS. > Should I prepare two different documents, one for GRASS only and one > for both GRASS and QGIS maybe it would be better, or at least to make note like "this package is required for GRASS compilation", etc. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
