Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Martin Landa: ... PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake. Markus Neteler: I would strongly advise against that (see '90s archive for some damages and OSGeo list archive too and others): http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html It is too risky. I have been asked several times in the past to remove posting from a list archive which is not only a PITA but also a can or worms (think censorship; which message to delete, which not etc.). Nikos Alexandris I just read about this past debate. So, it is always better to use the Reply to Mailing-List button (KMail here)? Markus Neteler: I don't know such button... (no KMail knowledge). Nikos Alexandris: Pohhh... I am really sorry if I caused any problem since I've always been using the Reply-to-All for the list and the Reply-to for personal messages. Markus Neteler wrote: But Reply-to-All for the list and the Reply-to for personal messages is perfect! Just go on. Nothing changed. I suggested to not change anything :) Nothing important, just for the records. Reading (again) this thread: I extracted from the respective debate (I mean the links posted by MarkusN [1][2]) that the Reply to Mailing-List button (at least in KMail) adds some special header or something like that which is the correct way to _reply_ in the list. In addition, in the past I had asked Markus to remove some posts of mine (due to a silly mistake) which was a really time-consuming and difficult process (judging by Markus replies back then -- but I am so grateful he helped me out -- thanks again Markus). So, I felt for a moment bad thinking that I could have brought even more problems in the list. Nevermind, it is good to know that there are no problems using the Reply-to-All button. Nikos --- [1] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html [2] http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Nikos Alexandris nikos.alexand...@felis.uni-freiburg.de wrote: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote: ... PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake. On Thursday 22 of April 2010 15:36:37 Markus Neteler wrote: Hi Martin, I would strongly advise against that (see '90s archive for some damages and OSGeo list archive too and others): http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html It is too risky. I have been asked several times in the past to remove posting from a list archive which is not only a PITA but also a can or worms (think censorship; which message to delete, which not etc.). My strong 0.02 cents :) Markus Markus, I just read about this past debate. So, it is always better to use the Reply to Mailing-List button (KMail here)? I don't know such button... (no KMail knowledge). Pohhh... I am really sorry if I caused any problem since I've always been using the Reply-to-All for the list and the Reply-to for personal messages. But Reply-to-All for the list and the Reply-to for personal messages is perfect! Just go on. Nothing changed. I suggested to not change anything :) Markus ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Hi, 2010/5/5 Nikos Alexandris nikos.alexand...@felis.uni-freiburg.de: [...] I just read about this past debate. So, it is always better to use the Reply to Mailing-List button (KMail here)? Pohhh... I am really sorry if I caused any problem since I've always been using the Reply-to-All for the list and the Reply-to for personal messages. AFAIU, Reply-to-All is OK. Martin -- Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote: ... PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake. On Thursday 22 of April 2010 15:36:37 Markus Neteler wrote: Hi Martin, I would strongly advise against that (see '90s archive for some damages and OSGeo list archive too and others): http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html It is too risky. I have been asked several times in the past to remove posting from a list archive which is not only a PITA but also a can or worms (think censorship; which message to delete, which not etc.). My strong 0.02 cents :) Markus Markus, I just read about this past debate. So, it is always better to use the Reply to Mailing-List button (KMail here)? Pohhh... I am really sorry if I caused any problem since I've always been using the Reply-to-All for the list and the Reply-to for personal messages. Nikos ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
[GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Hi I'm developing a small GRASS Python script but I will need to call an external executive. I already know where to put it (at $PATH) but i don't know how to call it from Python GRASS Script. How can I do this? (as an example it's helloWorld :) ) Thanks Best regards Kim ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Hi, 2010/4/22 Kim Besson kimbesson1...@gmail.com: I'm developing a small GRASS Python script but I will need to call an external executive. I already know where to put it (at $PATH) but i don't know how to call it from Python GRASS Script. How can I do this? (as an example it's helloWorld :) ) grass.call() e.g. grass.call(['whoami', '--version']) Martin -- Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Hi, 2010/4/22 Kim Besson kimbesson1...@gmail.com: From http://download.osgeo.org/grass/grass6_progman/core_8py_source.html I see that besides the main argument there is **kwargs. What is this? all defined arguments from Popen http://download.osgeo.org/grass/grass6_progman/classpython_1_1core_1_1Popen.html Martin -- Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
[GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Hi,
{please keep discussion on ML}
2010/4/22 Kim Besson kimbesson1...@gmail.com:
Bur for instance you separated two argument inside [ ]. This means that for
instance If I need to call a external function and inser input and output I
would have to do this:
grass.call(['whoami', 'input_file', 'output_file']) or
grass.call(['whoami input output_file'])
it's first argument 'args'.
Martin
PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML
(send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake.
--
Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Here now at the ML for everyone :)
But which one of the two options is correct? The first one or the second
one? Or both are ok? (at least the second one is correct I suppose)
2010/4/22 Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com
Hi,
{please keep discussion on ML}
2010/4/22 Kim Besson kimbesson1...@gmail.com:
Bur for instance you separated two argument inside [ ]. This means that
for
instance If I need to call a external function and inser input and output
I
would have to do this:
grass.call(['whoami', 'input_file', 'output_file']) or
grass.call(['whoami input output_file'])
it's first argument 'args'.
Martin
PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML
(send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake.
--
Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Hi, 2010/4/22 Kim Besson kimbesson1...@gmail.com: would have to do this: grass.call(['whoami', 'input_file', 'output_file']) or grass.call(['whoami input output_file']) if the syntax is 'cmd input output' then grass.call(['cmd', 'input', 'output']) see http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen Martin -- Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
Hi, 2010/4/22 Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com: would have to do this: grass.call(['whoami', 'input_file', 'output_file']) or grass.call(['whoami input output_file']) if the syntax is 'cmd input output' then grass.call(['cmd', 'input', 'output']) see http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen or check existing GRASS scripts, e.g. http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/scripts/v.in.e00/v.in.e00.py#L135 Martin -- Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Call an external function from GRASS-Pythons Scripts
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote: ... PS: Probably it would be reasonable to change configuration of ML (send replay to the list instead to 'from') to avoid this mistake. Hi Martin, I would strongly advise against that (see '90s archive for some damages and OSGeo list archive too and others): http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html It is too risky. I have been asked several times in the past to remove posting from a list archive which is not only a PITA but also a can or worms (think censorship; which message to delete, which not etc.). My strong 0.02 cents :) Markus ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
