Re: [GRASS-user] r.info output after r.reclass
On 2014-08-24 5:44, Hamish wrote: Hermann wrote: I am using [1] as rules for r.reclass to shift a map's value range of -100..100 to 0..200. fyi, see also r.recode, r.rescale, and r.mapcalc. I am aware. I don't want to create new map with 200 000 x 200 000 px (all of Europe in 20m resolution). I just want to quickly reclassify before exporting into GeoTIFF with type=Byte. After reclassification, r.info shows the result as quoted in [2]. I am missing the line saying that -100 has been reclassified to 0. Why is this line missing? I don't know, you might look into the $MAPSET/cellhd/mapname file and look for clues. It may be a hold-over from before GRASS 5, when '0' was treated as NULL. the important thing is that 'r.info -r' and r.univar show the correct values. Thanks for the hints. Is there any intention to get rid of the left-overs from GRASS 5, perhaps in GRASS 8 ? Hermann ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] r.info output after r.reclass
Hermann wrote: > I am using [1] as rules for r.reclass to shift a map's value range of > -100..100 to 0..200. fyi, see also r.recode, r.rescale, and r.mapcalc. > After reclassification, r.info shows the result > as quoted in [2]. I am missing the line saying that -100 has been > reclassified to 0. > > Why is this line missing? I don't know, you might look into the $MAPSET/cellhd/mapname file and look for clues. It may be a hold-over from before GRASS 5, when '0' was treated as NULL. the important thing is that 'r.info -r' and r.univar show the correct values. Hamish ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
[GRASS-user] r.info output after r.reclass
Hi again, I am using [1] as rules for r.reclass to shift a map's value range of -100..100 to 0..200. After reclassification, r.info shows the result as quoted in [2]. I am missing the line saying that -100 has been reclassified to 0. Why is this line missing? Wondering, Hermann [1] -100 = 0 -99 = 1 ... 99 = 199 100 = 200 [2] Range of data:min = 0 max = 200 ... CategoryOriginal categories 1 -99 2 -98 3 -97 ... -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/r-info-output-after-r-reclass-tp5158003.html Sent from the Grass - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
