Re: [GRASS-user] Re: r.watershed: pretty flat areas
On Wednesday 12 of May 2010 21:35:40 Markus Metz wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote: before after screenshots welcome :) before: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_regular.png after: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_beautified.png Looks really nice :-) ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Re: r.watershed: pretty flat areas
Markus Metz pisze: On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote: before after screenshots welcome :) before: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_regular.png after: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_beautified.png less straight flow, main flow is more centered in the lake. I can't say if this is more accurate, but it looks nicer. It's not perfect, see south-eastern part of the lake. ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user Hi As a way to proper drainage network topology it looks almost perfect. In DEM there is no information (if lake is represented by flat area on DEM) about flow structure in the lake so that approach looks good for me, if real flow is unknown! Good work Markus! J. ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Re: r.watershed: pretty flat areas
Nice! Many thanks Markus. Annalisa 2010/5/13 Jarosław Jasiewicz jar...@amu.edu.pl Markus Metz pisze: On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote: before after screenshots welcome :) before: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_regular.png after: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_beautified.png less straight flow, main flow is more centered in the lake. I can't say if this is more accurate, but it looks nicer. It's not perfect, see south-eastern part of the lake. ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user Hi As a way to proper drainage network topology it looks almost perfect. In DEM there is no information (if lake is represented by flat area on DEM) about flow structure in the lake so that approach looks good for me, if real flow is unknown! Good work Markus! J. ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Re: r.watershed: pretty flat areas
before after screenshots welcome :) ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Re: r.watershed: pretty flat areas
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote: before after screenshots welcome :) before: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_regular.png after: http://sites.google.com/site/markusmetzgiswork/accumulation_beautified.png less straight flow, main flow is more centered in the lake. I can't say if this is more accurate, but it looks nicer. It's not perfect, see south-eastern part of the lake. ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
