The caste train   *By: Gail Omvedt*
http://www.himalmag.com/The-caste-train_nw4420.html

*Waiting for an India when caste names will have lost their meaning.*

   Karen Haydock  Those who deny that caste is really much of a ‘problem’
should look at the case of Chitralekha. She is a Dalit (Pulaya caste) woman
in Payannur in Kerala, married to an Other Backward Caste man. In 2003, she
decided to take up the profession of autorickshaw driving (as her husband
does), since the nursing course she was in training for required night work,
which would have impeded on her ability to care for her children. Since
then, she has been constantly harassed by the ‘caste Hindus’ who dominate
the Communist Party of India (Marxist) autorickshaw union. Her autorickshaw
was torched; then a new one was also ruined by having salt poured into its
gas tank. Finally, she herself was beaten by a mob working with the police.
When we talked to the aggressive members of the union in the local CPM
office, they refused to even recognise Chitralekha’s marriage, calling her a
“woman who lives outside the tracks”. After all, she and husband,
Sheeshkant, had committed what the ‘sacred books’ call* varna-samkara*,
mixture of castes.

Outside the tracks? The tracks are those that bear the still-very-alive
caste system in India. The train that runs on those tracks is a gloomy one,
driven by the power of the Vedas, the *Manusmriti, *even the *Gita. *At its
head is the Brahmin engine, followed by other of the sacred ‘twice-born’.
Behind, without much power to influence its running, swung along by the wily
engine, are the Shudra carriages – divided from one another for, as B R
Ambedkar noted, “Caste is not a division of labour, it is a division of
labourers.” Different Shudra *jatis *are not supposed to intermarry or
‘inter-dine’, and even today violations of these codes evoke penalties in
many of India’s villages. The caboose is that of the Dalits, tagging along
at the end. Running at the side, perhaps, can be said to be the Adivasis,
the marginalised, with Brahmin hands reaching out to drag them along with
the train. And sitting in every carriage, often with curtains around them,
with inferior food and sleeping space and clothing, are the women of each
caste.

Today, there are those who not only want to get off the train, but to derail
it completely. Perhaps the victory appears distant; yet the inequality and
turmoil in modern-day India are unprecedented. Indians bring caste along
with them wherever they go in the world, and the debates and conflicts have
continued in England, the US, the Gulf and elsewhere. In the first two, the
tradition of civil rights has added support to the battle against the caste
train.

Just recently, in a victory for the ‘subalterns’, the British Parliament,
which considers racism a crime, voted to treat caste as part of race. It had
been a long struggle – with a group called the Hindu Council UK lobbying,
though a wordy report, that caste was really not a problem, that it had
originally been equalitarian, that calling Shudras “as the legs” (which the
Rig Veda does) had to be read in the context of legs being part of the body
and essential to it; and that, anyway, caste was dying. In short, the
Council rehashed all of the tired old arguments, which can also be found
today on countless ‘Hindu’ websites. But in the end, the arguments of
justice triumphed in England. Of course, caste and untouchability are
outlawed in India, too. The difference is that countries such as Britain
enforce their laws.

We want to derail the train, tear up the tracks. There are still Gandhians
today who argue that ‘caste’, with its supposed virtues of solidarity, can
be maintained without the hierarchy and oppression. This is impossible. What
would a caste-free India look like? Enough intermarriage, for one thing, so
that everyone would have to admit that they come from many ‘caste’
backgrounds. There would be openings everywhere according to talent, not the
supposed ‘merit’ type that belong to those with millennia of superior
backgrounds. There would be no identifiable ‘caste quarters’ in villages.
Perhaps names might remain – after all, the US and England have Smiths,
Carpenters, Potters – but in India, as there, no one would remember that
they mean anything. *

Gail Omvedt is Dr Ambedkar Chair for Social Change and Development at the
Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi.*

-- 
Ranjit

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to greenyo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to