[gmx-users] Peptide-membrane simulation force field parameters

2015-02-03 Thread tarak karmakar
Dear All,
I need a suggestion related to simulation of peptide-membrane system.
Are CGenFF parameters (from ParamChem) for peptide analogues good enough to
couple with Charmm36 parameters for the lipids in a membrane? (provided
very low charge and param penalties)

Thanks,
Tarak
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with 5.0.4 build

2015-02-03 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi,

That suggests that your source tree is dirty, somehow. Unpack a fresh
tarball and try again.

Mark

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Jim Tuccillo tucci...@sgi.com wrote:

 Hi Folks,

 I am seeing the following problem with a 5.0.4 build. I see that others
 have had this issue also but I haven't seen a solution. Any thoughts on how
 to address this? Thanks.

 The build is with the following:

 cmake ..  -DGMX_DOUBLE=ON -DGMX_SIMD=sse4.1 -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc
 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++ -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=fftw3
 -DGMX_PREFER_STATIC_LIBS=YES -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF
 -DFFTW_LIBRARY=$LOCATION/fftw-3.3.3/lib/libfftw3.a
 -DFFTW_INCLUDE_DIR=$LOCATION/fftw-3.3.3/include

 where $LOCATION Is specified.

 CMake Error at src/gromacs/gmxlib/CMakeLists.txt:46 (list):
   list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.


 CMake Error at src/gromacs/legacyheaders/CMakeLists.txt:41 (list):
   list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.


 CMake Error at src/gromacs/legacyheaders/CMakeLists.txt:42 (list):
   list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.



 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Virtual sites and diffusion coefficients.

2015-02-03 Thread sujithkakkat .
Hello Mark,

 I have tested both models in simulating a variety of properties. The
original parametrization results involved predicting the critical point of
CO2 and also density at various P and T. I did several NVT simulations to
predict density-vs-pressure data. In this case the model with virtual
interaction sites gave much better results.

 In addition to this, simulations performed were performed on pure CO2
at supercritical conditions and mean square displacement was calculated for
the CO2 molecule. When compared to the reported ab initio dynamics results
the one obtained  using virtual sites gave much better agreement.

 The density of CO2 dissolved in H2O at very dilute concentrations was
also studied using both models of CO2 and the results were in good
agreement with experimental data for the model with virtual sites. In this
case the one without virtual sites also did reasonably well.

  However, the disparity appears when considering the Measn Square
displacement of dilute CO2 solution in water. Here the model without
virtual sites is closer to the experimental data.

This has become very confusing now. The original parametrization of he
model did not involve predicting the transport properties. Also in the
published results using the EPM2 model  I don't find any mention of the
virtual interaction sites.

Regards,

Sujith.


On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi,

 With which set of parameters are you able to reproduce the original
 parametrization results?

 Mark

 On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:04 AM, sujithkakkat . sujithk...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Dear all,
 
   I tried simulating the CO2-water mixture with CO2 at a low
  concentration (0.003 mole fraction) at various temperatures at 1 atmos.
 
  I used the EPM2 parameters for the CO2 molecules which includes a
 flexible
  OCO angle. I did a separate simulation on the similar system with CO2
 model
  constructed using virtual sites (following Justin Lemkul's tutorial) ,
 with
  the interaction parameters same as the EPM2 model.
 
  In both cases the water model TIP4P was used.
 
  I ran 5ns simulation after equilibrium was attained for the T and P
 values.
 
When plotting the mean square displacement and fitting the graph to get
  the diffusion coefficients, what I find is that the diffusion coefficient
  obtained in the case of the CO2 model using virtual sites is much higher
  (approximately two times) of that obtained for the EPM2 model without the
  virtual sites.
 
Let me know if any one came across this before. I would like to hear
 from
  the more experienced users, what they think about this.
 
  I will provide further details on the topology and MD parameters if
  necessary.
 
  Regards,
 
  Sujith.
  --
  Gromacs Users mailing list
 
  * Please search the archive at
  http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
  posting!
 
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
  * For (un)subscribe requests visit
  https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
  send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Virtual sites and diffusion coefficients.

2015-02-03 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi,

With which set of parameters are you able to reproduce the original
parametrization results?

Mark

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:04 AM, sujithkakkat . sujithk...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear all,

  I tried simulating the CO2-water mixture with CO2 at a low
 concentration (0.003 mole fraction) at various temperatures at 1 atmos.

 I used the EPM2 parameters for the CO2 molecules which includes a flexible
 OCO angle. I did a separate simulation on the similar system with CO2 model
 constructed using virtual sites (following Justin Lemkul's tutorial) , with
 the interaction parameters same as the EPM2 model.

 In both cases the water model TIP4P was used.

 I ran 5ns simulation after equilibrium was attained for the T and P values.

   When plotting the mean square displacement and fitting the graph to get
 the diffusion coefficients, what I find is that the diffusion coefficient
 obtained in the case of the CO2 model using virtual sites is much higher
 (approximately two times) of that obtained for the EPM2 model without the
 virtual sites.

   Let me know if any one came across this before. I would like to hear from
 the more experienced users, what they think about this.

 I will provide further details on the topology and MD parameters if
 necessary.

 Regards,

 Sujith.
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Virtual sites and diffusion coefficients.

2015-02-03 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 2/3/15 3:56 AM, sujithkakkat . wrote:

Hello Mark,

  I have tested both models in simulating a variety of properties. The
original parametrization results involved predicting the critical point of
CO2 and also density at various P and T. I did several NVT simulations to
predict density-vs-pressure data. In this case the model with virtual
interaction sites gave much better results.

  In addition to this, simulations performed were performed on pure CO2
at supercritical conditions and mean square displacement was calculated for
the CO2 molecule. When compared to the reported ab initio dynamics results
the one obtained  using virtual sites gave much better agreement.

  The density of CO2 dissolved in H2O at very dilute concentrations was
also studied using both models of CO2 and the results were in good
agreement with experimental data for the model with virtual sites. In this
case the one without virtual sites also did reasonably well.

   However, the disparity appears when considering the Measn Square
displacement of dilute CO2 solution in water. Here the model without
virtual sites is closer to the experimental data.

 This has become very confusing now. The original parametrization of he
model did not involve predicting the transport properties. Also in the
published results using the EPM2 model  I don't find any mention of the
virtual interaction sites.



I'm rather amazed that my tutorial model works so well, but please note the 
strong caution I wrote in the topology.  There is no validation of this model at 
all, anywhere in the literature.  Any reviewer of your work is going to 
certainly want an explanation of the parameters, and some model from a tutorial 
that says it isn't guaranteed to be physically valid probably isn't going to 
satisfy them.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] Problem with 5.0.4 build

2015-02-03 Thread Jim Tuccillo
Hi Folks,

I am seeing the following problem with a 5.0.4 build. I see that others have 
had this issue also but I haven't seen a solution. Any thoughts on how to 
address this? Thanks.

The build is with the following:

cmake ..  -DGMX_DOUBLE=ON -DGMX_SIMD=sse4.1 -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc 
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++ -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=fftw3 -DGMX_PREFER_STATIC_LIBS=YES 
-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF -DFFTW_LIBRARY=$LOCATION/fftw-3.3.3/lib/libfftw3.a 
-DFFTW_INCLUDE_DIR=$LOCATION/fftw-3.3.3/include

where $LOCATION Is specified.

CMake Error at src/gromacs/gmxlib/CMakeLists.txt:46 (list):
  list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.


CMake Error at src/gromacs/legacyheaders/CMakeLists.txt:41 (list):
  list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.


CMake Error at src/gromacs/legacyheaders/CMakeLists.txt:42 (list):
  list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.



-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] REMD: mdrun_mpi crash with segmentation fault (but mpi is working)

2015-02-03 Thread Felipe Villanelo
Hi,

I trying to learn REMD following the tutorial on gromacs page
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Tutorials/GROMACS_USA_Workshop_and_Conference_2013/An_introduction_to_replica_exchange_simulations%3A_Mark_Abraham,_Session_1B
on
a 4-cores computer.
However when I try to use the command:
mpirun -np 4 mdrun_mpi -v -multidir equil[0123] (as the tutorial says)
the program crashed with the following error:
mpirun noticed that process rank 2 with PID 13013 on node debian exited on
signal 11 (Segmentation fault).

The mpi is running fine with the 4 cores if I run a simple gromacs
simulation (NPT equil) in the same machine.
So I think it is not a problem of mpi configuration (as I read in another
thread)

These with gromacs version is 5.0.2

If I try to run the same with an older version of gromacs (4.5.5) the error
is different (previously adjusting the options on the mdp file to match
changes in syntaxis betweeen versions):

[debian:23526] *** An error occurred in MPI_comm_size
[debian:23526] *** on communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
[debian:23526] *** MPI_ERR_COMM: invalid communicator
[debian:23526] *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (your MPI job will now abort)

But this version also work fine with mpi using the 4 cores on a simple
simulation

Thanks
Bye

Felipe Villanelo Lizana
Bioquímico
Laboratorio de Biología Estructural y Molecular
Universidad de Chile
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with Lysozyme in Water Tutorial

2015-02-03 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 2/3/15 2:16 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

Ok.  I understand the replys.

  I only have a couple of further questions.

A link to grompp is in /usr/local/gromacs/bin.

Why isn't ions.mdp in the run directory and then, where is it?



You download it from the tutorial site.

http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/lysozyme/04_ions.html

An example .mdp file (the one we will use) can be downloaded here. The word 
here is a clickable link to download the file.


-Justin


Thanks in advance.


On 02/02/2015 12:29 PM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:

It just means you either missed grompp -f ions.mdp ...

OR

the ions.mdp file is not there in the directory where you are performing
your simulations.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Stephen P. Molnar s.mol...@sbcglobal.net
wrote:


I have installed v-5.0.4 in Debian Wheezy without any warning or erroe
messages.

I have tried running the Lysozyme in Water Tutorial ( the one written for
v-5) and have generated an error message in Step 4.

The message is:

File input/output error:
ions.mdp
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

I checked the reference and did not find one [defaults] directive in the
.itp file, let alone two

Pleas advise.

Thanks in advance.

--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. Life is a fuzzy set
Foundation for Chemistry Stochastic and Multivariate
www.FoundationForChemistry.com
(614)312-7528(c)
Skype:  smolnar1

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.





--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with Lysozyme in Water Tutorial

2015-02-03 Thread Stephen P. Molnar

Ok.  I understand the replys.

 I only have a couple of further questions.

A link to grompp is in /usr/local/gromacs/bin.

Why isn't ions.mdp in the run directory and then, where is it?

Thanks in advance.


On 02/02/2015 12:29 PM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:

It just means you either missed grompp -f ions.mdp ...

OR

the ions.mdp file is not there in the directory where you are performing
your simulations.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Stephen P. Molnar s.mol...@sbcglobal.net
wrote:


I have installed v-5.0.4 in Debian Wheezy without any warning or erroe
messages.

I have tried running the Lysozyme in Water Tutorial ( the one written for
v-5) and have generated an error message in Step 4.

The message is:

File input/output error:
ions.mdp
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

I checked the reference and did not find one [defaults] directive in the
.itp file, let alone two

Pleas advise.

Thanks in advance.

--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. Life is a fuzzy set
Foundation for Chemistry Stochastic and Multivariate
www.FoundationForChemistry.com
(614)312-7528(c)
Skype:  smolnar1

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.Life is a fuzzy set
Foundation for ChemistryStochastic and Multivariate
www.FoundationForChemistry.com
(614)312-7528(c)
Skype:  smolnar1

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] Using pairs type 2

2015-02-03 Thread Liel Sapir
Hey all,

I have been reading many post about this issue, but still do not have a
clear answer.

I am using the AMBER force-field where 1-4 interactions are scaled (fudgeLJ
= 0.5 and fudgeQQ = 0.8333).
In addition I use parameters of molecules that require the 1-4 interaction
to NOT be scaled.

What I did to solve this issue is the follwoing: In the molecules *itp file
I listed all 1-4 interactions explicitly. I used the pairs type 2, as in
here:

[ pairs ]
1 14 2 1 0.161 0.175 0.339967 0.457730

As you can see, I use fudgeQQ=1, with the Real charges, and the needed LJ
parameters.

I think this works properly, and that it is equivalent (for the molecule of
interest) to use type 1 with no explicit parameters (that will be
accordingly generated from ffnonbonded.itp), along with a forcefield.itp
that sets the fudge factors to 1.0.

What worries me is that the manual says type 2 is used for free energy
simulations and TI.
Can I still use it as mentioned above? Am I missing something?

Thanks much,

Liel
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with Lysozyme in Water Tutorial

2015-02-03 Thread Stephen P. Molnar

On 02/03/2015 02:30 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:



On 2/3/15 2:16 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:

Ok.  I understand the replys.

  I only have a couple of further questions.

A link to grompp is in /usr/local/gromacs/bin.

Why isn't ions.mdp in the run directory and then, where is it?



You download it from the tutorial site.

http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/lysozyme/04_ions.html 



An example .mdp file (the one we will use) can be downloaded here. 
The word here is a clickable link to download the file.


-Justin


Thanks in advance.


On 02/02/2015 12:29 PM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:

It just means you either missed grompp -f ions.mdp ...

OR

the ions.mdp file is not there in the directory where you are 
performing

your simulations.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Stephen P. Molnar 
s.mol...@sbcglobal.net

wrote:


I have installed v-5.0.4 in Debian Wheezy without any warning or erroe
messages.

I have tried running the Lysozyme in Water Tutorial ( the one 
written for

v-5) and have generated an error message in Step 4.

The message is:

File input/output error:
ions.mdp
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the 
GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

I checked the reference and did not find one [defaults] directive 
in the

.itp file, let alone two

Pleas advise.

Thanks in advance.

--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. Life is a fuzzy set
Foundation for Chemistry Stochastic and Multivariate
www.FoundationForChemistry.com
(614)312-7528(c)
Skype:  smolnar1

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.





Many thanks flr the reply.  It was my fault for not reading carefully 
enough.,


--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. Life is a fuzzy set
Foundation for Chemistry Stochastic and Multivariate
www.FoundationForChemistry.com
(614)312-7528(c)
Skype:  smolnar1

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] Creating box,

2015-02-03 Thread Bishnu Acharya
Dear Gromacs User,

I am new in Gromacs. I want to create rectangular box like dimensions 5.0
 5.0  15.0 and want to put nonane-water-nonane on it. I mean there layers
first nonane and water and again nonane layers.
Would you please give some idea how to do it.

Thank you
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Creating box,

2015-02-03 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 2/3/15 8:32 PM, Bishnu Acharya wrote:

Dear Gromacs User,

I am new in Gromacs. I want to create rectangular box like dimensions 5.0
  5.0  15.0 and want to put nonane-water-nonane on it. I mean there layers
first nonane and water and again nonane layers.


There aren't two nonane layers, because the nonane is continuous via PBC.  So 
really you just have a simple biphasic system.  Conveniently, there's a tutorial 
that illustrates how to do that:


http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/biphasic/index.html

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Creating box,

2015-02-03 Thread Bishnu Acharya
Thank you very much for your suggestion.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 2/3/15 8:32 PM, Bishnu Acharya wrote:

 Dear Gromacs User,

 I am new in Gromacs. I want to create rectangular box like dimensions 5.0
   5.0  15.0 and want to put nonane-water-nonane on it. I mean there layers
 first nonane and water and again nonane layers.


 There aren't two nonane layers, because the nonane is continuous via PBC.
 So really you just have a simple biphasic system.  Conveniently, there's a
 tutorial that illustrates how to do that:

 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/
 gmx-tutorials/biphasic/index.html

 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
 Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.