Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

2015-07-09 Thread hannes.loeffler
This may be of help:
http://www.alchemistry.org/wiki/GROMACS_4.6_example:_n-phenylglycinonitrile_binding_to_T4_lysozyme

From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
[gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] on behalf of Natalie Nguyen 
[nguy...@wittenberg.edu]
Sent: 09 July 2015 14:19
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Asaf,

Thank you for the quick reply!

I was wondering if it was possible to use thermodynamic integration to 
represent growing harmonic restraints aside from using an analytical method.

I will cite this article most definitely!

Natalie Nguyen


From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of 
asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:45 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Natalie,

You have in

http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1502.07196v3.pdf

exact free energy of harmonic covalent bond and bond angle terms (or
restrains). See Eqs. (2) and (3).

There are also previous studies in the references there.

For the dihedral term I assume it can also be calculated exactly (I
might upload it).

There is also to think if there are other contributions.

If you are using it please cite.

Best regards,
Asaf


Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:

 Dear all,


 I am trying to measure the free energy change associated with
 adding/removing harmonic restraints imposed on a ligand that is
 attached to a protein. Is there any way to set this up?


 Thank you ahead of time!


 Natalie Nguyen
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
 or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

2015-07-09 Thread asaffarhi


The equations in the articles are relevant for the step Removal of  
Restraints in that link.


Please note that these equations have been verified in

http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01514

Best regards,
Asaf

Quoting hannes.loeff...@stfc.ac.uk:


This may be of help:
http://www.alchemistry.org/wiki/GROMACS_4.6_example:_n-phenylglycinonitrile_binding_to_T4_lysozyme

From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se  
[gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] on behalf of  
Natalie Nguyen [nguy...@wittenberg.edu]

Sent: 09 July 2015 14:19
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Asaf,

Thank you for the quick reply!

I was wondering if it was possible to use thermodynamic integration  
to represent growing harmonic restraints aside from using an  
analytical method.


I will cite this article most definitely!

Natalie Nguyen


From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se  
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of  
asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:45 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Natalie,

You have in

http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1502.07196v3.pdf

exact free energy of harmonic covalent bond and bond angle terms (or
restrains). See Eqs. (2) and (3).

There are also previous studies in the references there.

For the dihedral term I assume it can also be calculated exactly (I
might upload it).

There is also to think if there are other contributions.

If you are using it please cite.

Best regards,
Asaf


Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:


Dear all,


I am trying to measure the free energy change associated with
adding/removing harmonic restraints imposed on a ligand that is
attached to a protein. Is there any way to set this up?


Thank you ahead of time!


Natalie Nguyen
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before  
posting!


* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users  
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before  
posting!


* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users  
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before  
posting!


* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users  
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue topology database

2015-07-09 Thread Hamisu Aliyu Mohd
Thank You Mr. Peter I just checked your response and that really helps.
Gaussian allows you to save the file in different format(.pdb inclusive), I 
just choosed to save in .pdb format. I don’t know if I did the right thing. 
hahaha...
On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:17 PM, su sun.i...@gmail.com wrote:

 Peter, This question was for Ali.H.. 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 09-Jul-2015, at 5:20 pm, Peter Stern peter.st...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
 
 I never did that.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
 [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of su
 Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:26 PM
 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue 
 topology database
 
 How you converted the gaussian file into .pdb? Because once i did the same 
 and suffered from some missing co ordinates. 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 08-Jul-2015, at 11:16 pm, Peter Stern peter.st...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
 
 Look at the file: residuetypes.dat in the ../top/ directory of your 
 installation.
 It lists all the residue names and more.
 
 Peter Stern
 Weizmann Institute
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 8 ביולי 2015, at 17:45, Hamisu Aliyu Mohd hamisu.kaza...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:
 
 
 Dear gmx-users,
 
 I am really new in this field of endeavour and I am trying investigate the 
 solubility of peptides in organic solvents, I built a simple tripeptide 
 (gly-gly-gly) using Gaussian 5.0 and I convert the output file(.out) to 
 .pdb. I am now trying to use pdb2gmx tool to generate topology for my 
 peptide using GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656) I was 
 promoted with an error residue not found in residue topology database” I 
 checked  GROMACS website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors I 
 learned the residue must have the same name as in the force field, please 
 I don’t know the naming convention of this force field please HELP.
 
 Thanks 
 Ali H.
 Department of Chemistry
 University Dutse
 
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send 
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send 
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

2015-07-09 Thread asaffarhi

Dear Natalie,

You are welcome.
Could you please explain in more detail so maybe I can help?
Do you want to change the strength of the restraints and measure the  
free energy difference associated with this change?


Thanks. p.s there is also http://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.1620v7.pdf with  
the same equations.


Best regards,
Asaf

Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:


Dear Asaf,

Thank you for the quick reply!

I was wondering if it was possible to use thermodynamic integration  
to represent growing harmonic restraints aside from using an  
analytical method.


I will cite this article most definitely!

Natalie Nguyen


From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se  
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of  
asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:45 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Natalie,

You have in

http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1502.07196v3.pdf

exact free energy of harmonic covalent bond and bond angle terms (or
restrains). See Eqs. (2) and (3).

There are also previous studies in the references there.

For the dihedral term I assume it can also be calculated exactly (I
might upload it).

There is also to think if there are other contributions.

If you are using it please cite.

Best regards,
Asaf


Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:


Dear all,


I am trying to measure the free energy change associated with
adding/removing harmonic restraints imposed on a ligand that is
attached to a protein. Is there any way to set this up?


Thank you ahead of time!


Natalie Nguyen
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before  
posting!


* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users  
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before  
posting!


* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users  
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

2015-07-09 Thread Natalie Nguyen
Dear Asaf,

Thank you for the quick reply!

I was wondering if it was possible to use thermodynamic integration to 
represent growing harmonic restraints aside from using an analytical method. 

I will cite this article most definitely!

Natalie Nguyen


From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of 
asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:45 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Natalie,

You have in

http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1502.07196v3.pdf

exact free energy of harmonic covalent bond and bond angle terms (or
restrains). See Eqs. (2) and (3).

There are also previous studies in the references there.

For the dihedral term I assume it can also be calculated exactly (I
might upload it).

There is also to think if there are other contributions.

If you are using it please cite.

Best regards,
Asaf


Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:

 Dear all,


 I am trying to measure the free energy change associated with
 adding/removing harmonic restraints imposed on a ligand that is
 attached to a protein. Is there any way to set this up?


 Thank you ahead of time!


 Natalie Nguyen
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
 or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] How to justify when the trajectory reached equilibrium

2015-07-09 Thread Qing Lv
Thank you, Justin.
I am trying to simulate a protein-ligand complex to see the conformation 
transition during the simulation... We propose that the receptor pocket may be 
subject to a conformational change upon ligand-binding, so I want to verify it 
by MD...
I am really a newbie in molecular simulation and all I did to analysis were 
time evolution of RMSD, interaction energy, and visualization. I try to do some 
principal component analysis, but literature said that PCA must be performed 
after equilibrium...

Could you give me more info on block-averaging, or any other advice that will 
help?

Best,
Qing


At 2015-07-09 19:41:09, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:


On 7/8/15 9:48 PM, Qing Lv wrote:
 Hi,

 I did a 70-ns MD simulation. I wonder how to justify when the trajectory 
 reached equilibrium...
 Seen from RMSD-time curve of C-alpha, the curve reached about 1 nm at 12 ns 
 and kept stable after that. Could I justify that the system reached 
 equilibrium at 12 ns? Are there any methods/criteria to justify the 
 equilibrium other than RMSD evolution?


RMSD is pretty useless in telling you anything about convergence.  Great, your 
structure probably isn't changing a whole lot (but RMSD can also hide 
interesting things).  Assess convergence based on the quantities of interest - 
why did you do the simulation?  What behavior are you trying to observe, and 
what measurables do you use to assess it?  If those metrics are invariant with 
time (e.g. via block-averaging or something) then your simulation is likely 
converged.

-Justin

-- 
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Andrea Spinelli
Dear all,
I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:

convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

And now? 
What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with new 
state of protein folding simulation?
Please help me!

Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Andrea Spinelli
So, I’m ok! 
I can read the only one .gro file created at the first simulation as the final 
.gro file after all extensions. That’s right? 


On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:58 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:

 
 
 On 7/9/15 1:49 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:
 I’m sorry, I miss something with cut and paste command.
 On terminal I wrote:
 
 gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o md_0_2.tpr
 gmx mdrun -v -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt
 
 There is no gromacs coordinate file in VMD, I have to convert a md_0_2.tpr 
 into try or try file?
 
 
 The contents of md_0_1.tpr and md_0_2.tpr are identical except that the 
 latter contains a different number of steps.  When providing mdrun with a 
 .cpt file, it carries out the run from that point, so the starting point of 
 the run (time = 0) is always the same.
 
 The final coordinates are always written to a .gro file unless you specify a 
 different format (which your above command does not).  Whatever that file is 
 called depends on the first run (md_0_1), because the file names are stored 
 in the .cpt file; they will be appended to by default.  The final .gro file 
 has an appended name rather than being overwritten, IIRC.
 
 -Justin
 
 On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 
 
 On 7/9/15 1:25 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:
 Dear all,
 I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:
 
 convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
 mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt
 
 And now?
 
 Well, the above sequence of commands won't do anything because (1) it's 
 gmx convert-tpr not just convert-tpr and (2) if you create next.tpr 
 and try to run md_0_2.tpr then mdrun will exit.
 
 What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with new 
 state of protein folding simulation?
 
 Load it like any coordinate file.
 
 -Justin
 
 --
 ==
 
 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201
 
 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
 
 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send 
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 
 Andrea Spinelli
 
 Please do not print this email unless really need to.
 Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.
 
 
 -- 
 ==
 
 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201
 
 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
 
 ==
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

2015-07-09 Thread Natalie Nguyen
Dear Asaf,

Thank you again for putting in the time to respond to me so quickly.
What I have been trying to do was start from a system that is not restrained 
and grow the restraints onto the ligand, measuring the change in free energy of 
this. The harmonic restraints used are that of the umbrella pull code with a 
force constant of k= 1000 kJ/mol*nm^2. It is mentioned In the Gromacs manual 
for mdp options that the pull code can be controlled with restraint-lambdas, 
but there is not much detail other than this. I imagine that lambda =0 would 
represent a nonexistent potential with k= 0 and at lambda = 1 a full strength 
potential would be imposed. 
Please feel free to ask me to add more detail!

Warm regards,
Natalie


From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of 
asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:38 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Natalie,

You are welcome.
Could you please explain in more detail so maybe I can help?
Do you want to change the strength of the restraints and measure the
free energy difference associated with this change?

Thanks. p.s there is also http://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.1620v7.pdf with
the same equations.

Best regards,
Asaf

Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:

 Dear Asaf,

 Thank you for the quick reply!

 I was wondering if it was possible to use thermodynamic integration
 to represent growing harmonic restraints aside from using an
 analytical method.

 I will cite this article most definitely!

 Natalie Nguyen

 
 From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
 gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of
 asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il
 Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:45 AM
 To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

 Dear Natalie,

 You have in

 http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1502.07196v3.pdf

 exact free energy of harmonic covalent bond and bond angle terms (or
 restrains). See Eqs. (2) and (3).

 There are also previous studies in the references there.

 For the dihedral term I assume it can also be calculated exactly (I
 might upload it).

 There is also to think if there are other contributions.

 If you are using it please cite.

 Best regards,
 Asaf


 Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:

 Dear all,


 I am trying to measure the free energy change associated with
 adding/removing harmonic restraints imposed on a ligand that is
 attached to a protein. Is there any way to set this up?


 Thank you ahead of time!


 Natalie Nguyen
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
 or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
 or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
 or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Andrea Spinelli
I’m sorry, I miss something with cut and paste command.
On terminal I wrote:

gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o md_0_2.tpr
gmx mdrun -v -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

There is no gromacs coordinate file in VMD, I have to convert a md_0_2.tpr into 
try or try file?

On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:

 
 
 On 7/9/15 1:25 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:
 Dear all,
 I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:
 
 convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
 mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt
 
 And now?
 
 Well, the above sequence of commands won't do anything because (1) it's gmx 
 convert-tpr not just convert-tpr and (2) if you create next.tpr and try 
 to run md_0_2.tpr then mdrun will exit.
 
 What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with new 
 state of protein folding simulation?
 
 Load it like any coordinate file.
 
 -Justin
 
 -- 
 ==
 
 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201
 
 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
 
 ==
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] How to justify when the trajectory reached equilibrium

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 10:11 AM, Qing Lv wrote:

Thank you, Justin.
I am trying to simulate a protein-ligand complex to see the conformation 
transition during the simulation... We propose that the receptor pocket may be 
subject to a conformational change upon ligand-binding, so I want to verify it 
by MD...
I am really a newbie in molecular simulation and all I did to analysis were 
time evolution of RMSD, interaction energy, and visualization. I try to do some 
principal component analysis, but literature said that PCA must be performed 
after equilibrium...



If you are hypothesizing a conformational change, then you need a way to 
quantify that change - distances, angles, etc.



Could you give me more info on block-averaging, or any other advice that will 
help?



It means to evaluate quantities over successive blocks of time (e.g. using -b 
and -e that all GROMACS analysis tools support) and check to see whether or not 
the quantities of interest are varying over time or if they are stable, i.e. 
converged.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 1:25 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

Dear all,
I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:

convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

And now?


Well, the above sequence of commands won't do anything because (1) it's gmx 
convert-tpr not just convert-tpr and (2) if you create next.tpr and try to 
run md_0_2.tpr then mdrun will exit.



What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with new 
state of protein folding simulation?


Load it like any coordinate file.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 1:49 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

I’m sorry, I miss something with cut and paste command.
On terminal I wrote:

gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o md_0_2.tpr
gmx mdrun -v -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

There is no gromacs coordinate file in VMD, I have to convert a md_0_2.tpr into 
try or try file?



The contents of md_0_1.tpr and md_0_2.tpr are identical except that the latter 
contains a different number of steps.  When providing mdrun with a .cpt file, it 
carries out the run from that point, so the starting point of the run (time = 0) 
is always the same.


The final coordinates are always written to a .gro file unless you specify a 
different format (which your above command does not).  Whatever that file is 
called depends on the first run (md_0_1), because the file names are stored in 
the .cpt file; they will be appended to by default.  The final .gro file has an 
appended name rather than being overwritten, IIRC.


-Justin


On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 7/9/15 1:25 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

Dear all,
I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:

convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

And now?


Well, the above sequence of commands won't do anything because (1) it's gmx convert-tpr not just 
convert-tpr and (2) if you create next.tpr and try to run md_0_2.tpr then mdrun 
will exit.


What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with new 
state of protein folding simulation?


Load it like any coordinate file.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 2:10 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

So, I’m ok!
I can read the only one .gro file created at the first simulation as the final 
.gro file after all extensions. That’s right?



No, you should get a .gro file at the end of each run.  But that's missing out 
on most of the information; loading the trajectory is of course more informative 
than any single snapshot.


-Justin



On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:58 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 7/9/15 1:49 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

I’m sorry, I miss something with cut and paste command.
On terminal I wrote:

gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o md_0_2.tpr
gmx mdrun -v -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

There is no gromacs coordinate file in VMD, I have to convert a md_0_2.tpr into 
try or try file?



The contents of md_0_1.tpr and md_0_2.tpr are identical except that the latter 
contains a different number of steps.  When providing mdrun with a .cpt file, 
it carries out the run from that point, so the starting point of the run (time 
= 0) is always the same.

The final coordinates are always written to a .gro file unless you specify a 
different format (which your above command does not).  Whatever that file is 
called depends on the first run (md_0_1), because the file names are stored in 
the .cpt file; they will be appended to by default.  The final .gro file has an 
appended name rather than being overwritten, IIRC.

-Justin


On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 7/9/15 1:25 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

Dear all,
I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:

convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

And now?


Well, the above sequence of commands won't do anything because (1) it's gmx convert-tpr not just 
convert-tpr and (2) if you create next.tpr and try to run md_0_2.tpr then mdrun 
will exit.


What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with new 
state of protein folding simulation?


Load it like any coordinate file.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Andrea Spinelli
I don’t obtain a .gro file after each extension.
What is wrong?

On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:12 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:

 
 
 On 7/9/15 2:10 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:
 So, I’m ok!
 I can read the only one .gro file created at the first simulation as the 
 final .gro file after all extensions. That’s right?
 
 
 No, you should get a .gro file at the end of each run.  But that's missing 
 out on most of the information; loading the trajectory is of course more 
 informative than any single snapshot.
 
 -Justin
 
 
 On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:58 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 
 
 On 7/9/15 1:49 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:
 I’m sorry, I miss something with cut and paste command.
 On terminal I wrote:
 
 gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o md_0_2.tpr
 gmx mdrun -v -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt
 
 There is no gromacs coordinate file in VMD, I have to convert a md_0_2.tpr 
 into try or try file?
 
 
 The contents of md_0_1.tpr and md_0_2.tpr are identical except that the 
 latter contains a different number of steps.  When providing mdrun with a 
 .cpt file, it carries out the run from that point, so the starting point of 
 the run (time = 0) is always the same.
 
 The final coordinates are always written to a .gro file unless you specify 
 a different format (which your above command does not).  Whatever that file 
 is called depends on the first run (md_0_1), because the file names are 
 stored in the .cpt file; they will be appended to by default.  The final 
 .gro file has an appended name rather than being overwritten, IIRC.
 
 -Justin
 
 On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
 
 
 
 On 7/9/15 1:25 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:
 Dear all,
 I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:
 
 convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
 mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt
 
 And now?
 
 Well, the above sequence of commands won't do anything because (1) it's 
 gmx convert-tpr not just convert-tpr and (2) if you create next.tpr 
 and try to run md_0_2.tpr then mdrun will exit.
 
 What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with 
 new state of protein folding simulation?
 
 Load it like any coordinate file.
 
 -Justin
 
 --
 ==
 
 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201
 
 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
 
 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before 
 posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or 
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 
 Andrea Spinelli
 
 Please do not print this email unless really need to.
 Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.
 
 
 --
 ==
 
 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201
 
 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
 
 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send 
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 
 Andrea Spinelli
 
 Please do not print this email unless really need to.
 Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.
 
 
 -- 
 ==
 
 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201
 
 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
 
 ==
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Andrea 

[gmx-users] g_hbond

2015-07-09 Thread Nilesh Dhumal
Hello,

I am calculating g_hbond for water system.  I have a question about
specifying two group for calculating hydrogen bond.

Do I specify atoms in triplet(O-H---O)?
Can I specify O-H as one group (Donor-Hydrogen) and O in other group
(Acceptor)?
Default  -r cutoff is 0.35nm. Is the distance between hydrogen---acceptor
or distance between donor---acceptor?

Thanks,

Nilesh

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond

2015-07-09 Thread Nilesh Dhumal
Thanks.

I will use two groups.

Nilesh

 On 7/9/15 9:13 PM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:


 On 7/9/15 9:02 PM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
 Hello,

 I am calculating g_hbond for water system.  I have a question about
 specifying two group for calculating hydrogen bond.

 Do I specify atoms in triplet(O-H---O)?
 Can I specify O-H as one group (Donor-Hydrogen) and O in other group
 (Acceptor)?

 If the system is pure water, you do not need any special index groups.

 I have DMSO in the system. I just mentioned water to make it simple.
 I am interested in O--H---O(DMSO) interactions?

 How should I specify this?

 With one triplet O--H---O(DMSO) or two groups one O--H and second
 O(DMSO)

 The latter - just use DMSO and water groups.  O can be a donor or
 acceptor, and
 g_hbond intelligently figures out whether or not a given atom is a donor
 or
 acceptor (or both).

 -Justin


 Default  -r cutoff is 0.35nm. Is the distance between
 hydrogen---acceptor
 or distance between donor---acceptor?

 Read the first sentence of the help description.

 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] Question regarding box size

2015-07-09 Thread James Lord
Hi all,
I have a system with 300k atoms, but computationally it is expensive for me
doing simulation with such a big system, Is it possible to reduce the box
size? If yes how? (the .gro file is uploaded). I know from Justin tutorial
genconf
-nboxvector 1 1 1
Does the numbers after -nbox have to  integer?

The size of box required to contain protein with 1.5nm of water on each
side. Sorry I could not figure it out what to do and how to tackle this
simple task. re bulding the simulation from scratch is an option but
thought might find quicker and smarter way here. I want to have optimum
size in each direction so that the protein does not see its periodic image.
Appreciate any specific thoughts on my system and the box size I have got
now.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0YMTXH1gmQsdFVKWkdPLURCUVk/view?usp=sharing

Cheers
James
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond

2015-07-09 Thread Nilesh Dhumal


 On 7/9/15 9:02 PM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
 Hello,

 I am calculating g_hbond for water system.  I have a question about
 specifying two group for calculating hydrogen bond.

 Do I specify atoms in triplet(O-H---O)?
 Can I specify O-H as one group (Donor-Hydrogen) and O in other group
 (Acceptor)?

 If the system is pure water, you do not need any special index groups.

I have DMSO in the system. I just mentioned water to make it simple.
I am interested in O--H---O(DMSO) interactions?

How should I specify this?

With one triplet O--H---O(DMSO) or two groups one O--H and second O(DMSO)

 Default  -r cutoff is 0.35nm. Is the distance between
 hydrogen---acceptor
 or distance between donor---acceptor?

 Read the first sentence of the help description.

 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] on trjconv command

2015-07-09 Thread Qing Lv
Hi Brett,

I think the following command will work:
trjconv -f source.xtc -skip 5 -o target.xtc

Qing



At 2015-07-10 10:10:39, Brett brettliu...@163.com wrote:
Dear All,


Will you please show me the command based on the following cited content from 
the website on how to convert a xtc file with 1 frame per 2 ps to a xtc file 
with 1 frame per 10 ps? I hope the command contains “-dt” and “-timestep”, and 
what the values should be for  “-dt” and “-timestep”.


Best regards


Brett


With -dt it is possible to reduce the number of frames in the output. This 
option relies on the accuracy of the times in your input trajectory, so if 
these are inaccurate use the -timestep option to modify the time (this can be 
done simultaneously).
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 9:13 PM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:



On 7/9/15 9:02 PM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:

Hello,

I am calculating g_hbond for water system.  I have a question about
specifying two group for calculating hydrogen bond.

Do I specify atoms in triplet(O-H---O)?
Can I specify O-H as one group (Donor-Hydrogen) and O in other group
(Acceptor)?


If the system is pure water, you do not need any special index groups.


I have DMSO in the system. I just mentioned water to make it simple.
I am interested in O--H---O(DMSO) interactions?

How should I specify this?

With one triplet O--H---O(DMSO) or two groups one O--H and second O(DMSO)


The latter - just use DMSO and water groups.  O can be a donor or acceptor, and 
g_hbond intelligently figures out whether or not a given atom is a donor or 
acceptor (or both).


-Justin




Default  -r cutoff is 0.35nm. Is the distance between
hydrogen---acceptor
or distance between donor---acceptor?


Read the first sentence of the help description.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send
a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.






--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] trouble diagnosing a simulation that's blowing up (shake not converging -- segmentation fault)

2015-07-09 Thread Nathan K Houtz
Thanks for your explanations, Dr. Lemkul.

I had already corrected a couple of the things you suggested. Gromacs won't 
actually let me run with Nose-Hoover and Parrinello-Rahman together (or at 
least, it gives a warning not to do that and stops). I'd like to run in NVT 
anyway, so I had set Pcoupl to 'no'. I had also increased the cutoffs and my 
nstlist is 20.

I have now also changed the tcoupl to v-rescale, but unfortunately that alone 
didn't help. So I'm not sure exactly what I can inspect to find the source of 
my error. I know that temperature, pressure, and total energy are all warning 
signs of bad things if they misbehave, but they were all fairly constant 
throughout the simulation. (This is for the flexible-model simulation:) The 
starting energy for 1700 water molecules at 120K was -1.08744e+05, and it 
finished at -1.06047e+05 with no significant variations on any step. Pressure 
and temperature were also fine. I attempted to look at the results visually in 
vmd but I might have done something wrong because the .trr file has some error 
in it and vmd crashes. But the starting geometry after minimization looks fine: 
none of the molecules were moved out of their position in the crystal. 

For the constrained molecules, the energy stays about the same (about -1e+5) 
for the first 8 timesteps and then quickly blows up to +2e15 at step 12 before 
it obviously fails. I get shake warnings from step 0 though. In vmd, the first 
8 steps look reasonable (checking the .pdb files that gromacs outputs when 
there are warnings) and all the molecules seem to hold their places in the 
crystal, but then at step 9 suddenly some of the molecules become misshapen 
with very long or very short bonds. Of course it goes downhill from there, but 
I can't figure out what's causing the problems since it's clearly happening 
from the very beginning (according to the shake warnings). 

What other things could I look at to troubleshoot my problem?

Thanks for your help,
Nathan

- Original Message -
From: Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 7:39:47 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] trouble diagnosing a simulation that's blowing up 
(shake not converging -- segmentation fault)



On 7/8/15 8:06 PM, Nathan K Houtz wrote:
 Hello,

 I deleted the email and can't respond to my last reply directly - sorry! I
 got this response from Mark Abraham:

 Hi, Try doing some EM and initial equilibration with no constraints at all,
 perhaps? Mark

 I tried commenting out the shake commands, and got a short (5000 step)
 simulation to run just fine without blowing up. Before, I would get shake
 warnings from the first few steps and a segmentation fault around step 13 or
 14. I would like to be able to simulate with rigid molecules, though. Why
 would the simulation work with flexible molecules but not rigid ones?


Flexible water allows weird geometry, which is probably coming up and causing 
your constraint algorithm to fail.  I'd inspect the outcome carefully.  Just 
because it runs doesn't mean it's right.

 Also, in the example .mdp file for tip4p water, there is the (outdated)
 option, 'unconstrained-start', which is now 'continuation'. I got errors when
 trying to make the input .tpr file when I attempted to set that option to
 'yes'. The warning said it was because I want Gromacs to generate velocities
 to start the simulation, which is incompatible with that command. Is there
 another way I can try to start the simulation unconstrained? Or would you
 suggest another idea to fix my shake warnings?


What this setting says is have the constraints already been solved 
(continuation = yes) or should mdrun constrain the starting configuration 
itself 
(continuation = no).

The .mdp file has a number of weird settings.  I would never use Nose-Hoover 
and 
Parrinello-Rahman when generating velocities; that's likely to be very 
unstable. 
  See if a more forgiving thermostat and/or barostat resolves the issue, e.g. 
tcoupl = v-rescale and pcoupl = Berendsen.

Also note that the cutoffs are very short (probably because they want to use a 
small box, but note that it *does* affect the physics) and nstlist = 1 is 
totally unnecessary.  It doesn't hurt your physics, but it's a major waste of 
performance.

-Justin

-- 
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit

Re: [gmx-users] How to justify when the trajectory reached equilibrium

2015-07-09 Thread Qing Lv
 It means to evaluate quantities over successive blocks of time (e.g. using -b 
 and -e that all GROMACS analysis tools support) and check to see whether or 
 not the quantities of interest are varying over time or if they are stable, 
 i.e. converged.


Thank you, Justin.
What size of blocks I need to divide in such an analysis? e.g., for a 100-ns 
trajectory, is it appropriate to divide it into 5-ns or 10-ns blocks to see if 
it has converged?

Qing




At 2015-07-10 01:39:42, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:


On 7/9/15 10:11 AM, Qing Lv wrote:
 Thank you, Justin.
 I am trying to simulate a protein-ligand complex to see the conformation 
 transition during the simulation... We propose that the receptor pocket may 
 be subject to a conformational change upon ligand-binding, so I want to 
 verify it by MD...
 I am really a newbie in molecular simulation and all I did to analysis were 
 time evolution of RMSD, interaction energy, and visualization. I try to do 
 some principal component analysis, but literature said that PCA must be 
 performed after equilibrium...


If you are hypothesizing a conformational change, then you need a way to 
quantify that change - distances, angles, etc.

 Could you give me more info on block-averaging, or any other advice that 
 will help?


It means to evaluate quantities over successive blocks of time (e.g. using -b 
and -e that all GROMACS analysis tools support) and check to see whether or 
not 
the quantities of interest are varying over time or if they are stable, i.e. 
converged.

-Justin

-- 
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] how to make 8M solutions??

2015-07-09 Thread SAPNA BORAH
Thanks.

Regards,
Sapna.

Sapna Mayuri Borah
c/o Dr. A. N. Jha
Research student
Tezpur University,
India

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi,

 Since you know how to add n molecules, and you want a solution with a given
 molality, work out how many molecules that is, and then add that many
 molecules. Decide whether you care about the volume excluded by the protein
 when considering what that molality means.

 Mark

 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:51 AM SAPNA BORAH sapnauser...@gmail.com wrote:

  Dear all,
 
  I am trying to add gdmcl to a protein, however I am unable to make molal
  solutions.
  I can add gdmcl by -nmol command but to make molal solutions is giving
 me a
  hard time. This is a basic query but it has been bugging me for quite a
  long time.
 
  Please put some light on doing this...
 
  I have been using the following commands to make the gdmcl box:
 
  editconf -f mod.pdb -bt cubic -d 0.1 -box 5 5 5 -o box.gro
  genbox -cp box.gro -ci file_1.pdb -p topol.top -o guan.pdb -nmol 100
 
  editconf -f guan.pdb -bt cubic -d 1.2 -o box_2.gro
  genbox -cp box_2.gro -cs spc216.gro -p topol.top -o solvated.gro
 
  The simulations I have been running well with the included 100 GdmCl,
  however, the problem with making the molal solutions still remains.
 
 
  Regards,
  Sapna
 
  Sapna Mayuri Borah
  Research student
  Tezpur University,
  India
  --
  Gromacs Users mailing list
 
  * Please search the archive at
  http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
  posting!
 
  * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
  * For (un)subscribe requests visit
  https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
  send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] on trjconv command

2015-07-09 Thread Brett
Dear All,


Will you please show me the command based on the following cited content from 
the website on how to convert a xtc file with 1 frame per 2 ps to a xtc file 
with 1 frame per 10 ps? I hope the command contains “-dt” and “-timestep”, and 
what the values should be for  “-dt” and “-timestep”.


Best regards


Brett


With -dt it is possible to reduce the number of frames in the output. This 
option relies on the accuracy of the times in your input trajectory, so if 
these are inaccurate use the -timestep option to modify the time (this can be 
done simultaneously).
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 9:02 PM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:

Hello,

I am calculating g_hbond for water system.  I have a question about
specifying two group for calculating hydrogen bond.

Do I specify atoms in triplet(O-H---O)?
Can I specify O-H as one group (Donor-Hydrogen) and O in other group
(Acceptor)?


If the system is pure water, you do not need any special index groups.


Default  -r cutoff is 0.35nm. Is the distance between hydrogen---acceptor
or distance between donor---acceptor?


Read the first sentence of the help description.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] (no subject)

2015-07-09 Thread PAULAMI CHATTERJEE
Dear All,
I have a 30 ns trajectory which I would like to extend up to 100 ns. For that I 
gave the following commands
gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 7 -o final_monomer.tpr
gmx mdrun -s final_monomer.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append
After completion of the extension two new trajectory files were generated- 
'traj.trr' and 'traj_comp.xtc' . When I tried to check the length of the 
trajectory with
gmxcheck -f traj_comp.xtc
the output is
Checking file traj_comp.xtc
Reading frame 0 time 3.000 
# Atoms 16867
Precision 0.001 (nm)
Last frame 35000 time 10.000

This trajectory file contains coordinate values from 30ns to 100ns. I tried to 
calculate the rmsd with this file (both the trr and xtc file) but the graph 
abruptly starts from 30ns (instead of 0) and continues upto 100ns.For the 
calculation I need the total trajectory from time 0 to time 100ns.I think I am 
missing something.
Can anyone please suggest anything here? Which one is the total trajectory file 
then?
Thanks in advancePaulami

 
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

[gmx-users] Problem with the MDS extended trajectory in Gromacs 5.04

2015-07-09 Thread PAULAMI CHATTERJEE
Dear All,
I have a 30 ns trajectory which I would like to extend up to 100 ns. For that I 
gave the following commands
gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 7 -o final_monomer.tpr
gmx mdrun -s final_monomer.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append
After completion of the extension two new trajectory files were generated- 
'traj.trr' and 'traj_comp.xtc' . When I tried to check the length of the 
trajectory with
gmxcheck -f traj_comp.xtc
the output is
Checking file traj_comp.xtc
Reading frame 0 time 3.000 
# Atoms 16867
Precision 0.001 (nm)
Last frame 35000 time 10.000

This trajectory file contains coordinate values from 30ns to 100ns. I tried to 
calculate the rmsd with this file (both the trr and xtc file) but the graph 
abruptly starts from 30ns (instead of 0) and continues upto 100ns.For the 
calculation I need the total trajectory from time 0 to time 100ns.I think I am 
missing something.
Can anyone please suggest anything here? Which one is the total trajectory file 
then?
Thanks in advancePaulami 
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue topology database

2015-07-09 Thread su
Peter, This question was for Ali.H.. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On 09-Jul-2015, at 5:20 pm, Peter Stern peter.st...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
 
 I never did that.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
 [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of su
 Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:26 PM
 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue topology 
 database
 
 How you converted the gaussian file into .pdb? Because once i did the same 
 and suffered from some missing co ordinates. 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 08-Jul-2015, at 11:16 pm, Peter Stern peter.st...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
 
 Look at the file: residuetypes.dat in the ../top/ directory of your 
 installation.
 It lists all the residue names and more.
 
 Peter Stern
 Weizmann Institute
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 8 ביולי 2015, at 17:45, Hamisu Aliyu Mohd hamisu.kaza...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:
 
 
 Dear gmx-users,
 
 I am really new in this field of endeavour and I am trying investigate the 
 solubility of peptides in organic solvents, I built a simple tripeptide 
 (gly-gly-gly) using Gaussian 5.0 and I convert the output file(.out) to 
 .pdb. I am now trying to use pdb2gmx tool to generate topology for my 
 peptide using GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656) I was 
 promoted with an error residue not found in residue topology database” I 
 checked  GROMACS website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors I 
 learned the residue must have the same name as in the force field, please I 
 don’t know the naming convention of this force field please HELP.
 
 Thanks 
 Ali H.
 Department of Chemistry
 University Dutse
 
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send 
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] Multiple output trajectories with different sampling frequencies

2015-07-09 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi,

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:01 PM Machtens, Jan-Philipp 
j.macht...@fz-juelich.de wrote:

 Dear all,
 I have a problem where I am interested in fast processes in one part
 of the system and a slow process in another, distinct part of the system.
 Due to disk space limitation,
 I would like mdrun to write (either compressed or full precision) output
 trajectories for different parts of the system at different output/sampling
 frequencies.

 GROMACS does not take into account distinct parameters for
 compressed-x-grps, right ?


Right, these take a single field (the first one).


 I mean the second nstxout-compressed and compressed-x-precision parameters
 are not taken into account:
 ; Output frequency and precision for .xtc file
 nstxout-compressed   = 1 100
 compressed-x-precision   = 1000 1000
 compressed-x-grps= Protein System__!Protein

 As a workaround I could write the whole system at low sampling rate to an
 uncompressed trajectory, and
 one part of the system could be written at high frequency to a compressed
 trajectory.
 But what if I want a trr file also for the high-frequency sampling group
 ?

 Do you know solutions better than writing the whole system to a full
 precision trajectory at high sampling frequency,
 followed by post-processing and possibly deleting the initial raw
 trajectory?


There is no support in GROMACS for simplifying that workflow.

In principle, the TNG support in GROMACS 5 makes available a file format
that can handle writing such customized output (different groups at
different precision and/or frequency) to a single file, but neither the
.mdp input format nor mdrun has been extended to support actually writing
such files.

Mark


 Many thanks!

 Cheers,
 
 Dr. Jan-Philipp Machtens
 Institute of Complex Systems - Zelluläre Biophysik (ICS-4)
 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
 



 

 
 Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
 52425 Juelich
 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
 Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
 Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender),
 Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
 Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt

 

 

 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue topology database

2015-07-09 Thread Peter Stern
I never did that.


-Original Message-
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
[mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of su
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:26 PM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue topology 
database

How you converted the gaussian file into .pdb? Because once i did the same and 
suffered from some missing co ordinates. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On 08-Jul-2015, at 11:16 pm, Peter Stern peter.st...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
 
 Look at the file: residuetypes.dat in the ../top/ directory of your 
 installation.
 It lists all the residue names and more.
 
 Peter Stern
 Weizmann Institute
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 8 ביולי 2015, at 17:45, Hamisu Aliyu Mohd hamisu.kaza...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:
 
 
 Dear gmx-users,
 
 I am really new in this field of endeavour and I am trying investigate the 
 solubility of peptides in organic solvents, I built a simple tripeptide 
 (gly-gly-gly) using Gaussian 5.0 and I convert the output file(.out) to 
 .pdb. I am now trying to use pdb2gmx tool to generate topology for my 
 peptide using GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656) I was 
 promoted with an error residue not found in residue topology database” I 
 checked  GROMACS website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors I 
 learned the residue must have the same name as in the force field, please I 
 don’t know the naming convention of this force field please HELP.
 
 Thanks 
 Ali H.
 Department of Chemistry
 University Dutse
 
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 -- 
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at 
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
 mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

2015-07-09 Thread asaffarhi

Dear Natalie,

You have in

http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1502.07196v3.pdf

exact free energy of harmonic covalent bond and bond angle terms (or  
restrains). See Eqs. (2) and (3).


There are also previous studies in the references there.

For the dihedral term I assume it can also be calculated exactly (I  
might upload it).


There is also to think if there are other contributions.

If you are using it please cite.

Best regards,
Asaf


Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:


Dear all,


I am trying to measure the free energy change associated with  
adding/removing harmonic restraints imposed on a ligand that is  
attached to a protein. Is there any way to set this up?



Thank you ahead of time!


Natalie Nguyen
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before  
posting!


* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users  
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Grompp checkpoint bug?

2015-07-09 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi,

I thought this was supposed to work (I wrote that doc sentence, but have
forgotten what's in the code). Can you please open an issue at
redmine.gromacs.org and attach suitable files so I can see how grompp is
working for you?

Thanks,

Mark

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:06 AM Dries Van Rompaey dries.vanromp...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 I’m experiencing some discrepancies when I pass the checkpoint file to
 grompp using the -t checkpoint flag:

 grompp -f md.mdp -o md.tpr -p topol.top -c md_res_1.gro -t md_res_1.cpt

 This command results in a tpr file without any variables for barostat and
 thermostat:
 box (3x3):
box[0]={ 6.70916e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
box[1]={ 0.0e+00,  6.70916e+00,  0.0e+00}
box[2]={ 3.35458e+00,  3.35458e+00,  4.74410e+00}
 box_rel (3x3):
box_rel[0]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
box_rel[1]={ 0.0e+00,  1.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
box_rel[2]={ 5.0e-01,  5.0e-01,  7.07108e-01}
 boxv (3x3):
boxv[0]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
boxv[1]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
boxv[2]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
 pres_prev (3x3):
pres_prev[0]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
pres_prev[1]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
pres_prev[2]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
 svir_prev (3x3):
svir_prev[0]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
svir_prev[1]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
svir_prev[2]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
 fvir_prev (3x3):
fvir_prev[0]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
fvir_prev[1]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
fvir_prev[2]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
 nosehoover_xi: not available

 These values are, however, present in the cpt file:
 box (3x3):
box[0]={ 6.69977e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
box[1]={ 0.0e+00,  6.69977e+00,  0.0e+00}
box[2]={ 3.34989e+00,  3.34989e+00,  4.73746e+00}
 box-rel (3x3):
box-rel[0]={ 0.0e+00,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
box-rel[1]={ 0.0e+00,  1.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
box-rel[2]={ 5.0e-01,  5.0e-01,  7.07108e-01}
 box-v (3x3):
box-v[0]={ 3.46479e-02,  0.0e+00,  0.0e+00}
box-v[1]={ 0.0e+00,  3.46479e-02,  0.0e+00}
box-v[2]={ 1.73240e-02,  1.73240e-02,  2.44998e-02}
 pres_prev (3x3):
pres_prev[0]={ 5.48752e+02,  2.40244e+02, -2.50854e+02}
pres_prev[1]={ 2.39676e+02, -8.38463e+01, -4.59079e+02}
pres_prev[2]={-2.52490e+02, -4.60009e+02,  7.15652e-01}
 nosehoover-xi:   -0.2659910.015571

 Running the tpr file and additionally providing the checkpoint through the
 ‘mdrun -cpi’ command produces a different output than running mdrun using
 the same tpr (even though the checkpoint has already been passed into
 grompp).
 This seems to be contrary to the intended behaviour, as the manual states:
 'If you wish to change the ensemble or things like output frequency, then
 supplying the checkpoint file to gmx grompp with -t along with a new .mdp
 http://manual.gromacs.org/online/mdp.html file with -f is the
 recommended
 procedure.’
 If what I’m seeing is, in fact, the intended behaviour, it might be useful
 to explicitly mention the need to supplement grompp with the energy files
 as well in order to keep the barostat variables.


 Kind regards

 Dries
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] Energy minimization

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/8/15 8:03 PM, Malihe Hasanzadeh wrote:

Hi,
I want to do MD simulation of protein-DNA-ligand using Gromacs 5.0.4.,when I
do energy minimization, my system is converged but has positive potential
energy. also this step only takes 3 second! for next step (pr), gives error:
your system is not equilibrated well and blowing up! I chcked my em.pdb
file and
I saw the Sol box is separated from protein and DNA!


This is probably just a PBC effect; use trjconv.


Could you please help me, what should I do?what part of my set is wrong?



Your EM outcome suggests an unresolvable clash in the system, so it's pointless 
to try dynamics unless you get a force below the specified tolerance (or at 
least of some other reasonable magnitude).  mdrun tells you where the maximum 
force is, so that's where you should start looking.  Beyond that, you'll have to 
give us a complete description of what you've done to prepare the system, 
parametrize the ligand, etc.  General troubleshooting that you should always follow:


http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up#Diagnosing_an_Unstable_System


my em.mdp:
define = -DFLEXIBLE


I'm assuming you're trying to use rigid water during the subsequent dynamics 
(you should), so you'll want to re-minimize without flexible water. 
Occasionally, the waters distort and SETTLE cannot fix the geometry.  This is 
not likely the source of your problem, just an FYI.


-Justin


integrator = cg ; steep
nsteps = 4000
nstlist = 1
constraints = none
emtol = 100.0
nstcgsteep = 10 ; do a steep every 10 steps of cg
emstep = 0.01 ; used with steep
nstcomm = 1
nstcalcenergy = 1.2
ewald_rtol = 1e-05
coulombtype = PME
cutoff-scheme = Group
ns_type = grid
rlist = 1.4
rcoulomb =1.4
rvdw = 1.4
Tcoupl = no
Pcoupl = no
gen_vel = no
nstxout = 0 ; write coords every # step
optimize_fft = yes

Sincerely,
Malihe



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with the MDS extended trajectory in GROMACS 5.0.4

2015-07-09 Thread soumadwip ghosh
Hi,
Say your initial mdrun command for 30 ns were as follow

grompp_mpi -c npt.gro -p topol.top -n index.ndx -t npt.cpt -o md_0_1.tpr
and
mdrun_mpi -deffnm md_0_1

Then you should get the files such as md_0_1.xtc, md_0_1.log,
md_0_1.edr, md_0_1.cpt, md_0_1.trr and so on

Then you obtain a new tpr file say new_100ns.tpr using tpbconv or gmx
convert with appropriate flags.
.
Now, if you want to extend your simulation by a certain amount of time
and want all your previous files appended the exact command should be
something like


mdrun_mpi -s new_100ns.tpr -v -deffnm md_0_1 -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append


I did it once and coordinates were saved from 0ns all the way to 100ns
and the same md_0_1.xtc, md_0_1.edr etc files were apeended without
any difficulty. I am not quite sure but there's no harm in trying.

Cheers,
Soumadwip
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Problem with the MDS extended trajectory in Gromacs 5.04

2015-07-09 Thread PAULAMI CHATTERJEE
I have used the following commands for the initial mdrun
gmx grompp -f md.mdp -c npt.gro -t npt.cpt -p topol.top -o md_0_1.tprgmx mdrun 
-deffnm md_0_1 
Can you please suggest now what went wrong?
Paulami

 
 


 On Thursday, 9 July 2015 5:12 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
   

 

On 7/9/15 4:15 AM, PAULAMI CHATTERJEE wrote:
 Dear All,
 I have a 30 ns trajectory which I would like to extend up to 100 ns. For that 
 I gave the following commands
 gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 7 -o final_monomer.tpr
 gmx mdrun -s final_monomer.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append
 After completion of the extension two new trajectory files were generated- 
 'traj.trr' and 'traj_comp.xtc' . When I tried to check the length of the 
 trajectory with
 gmxcheck -f traj_comp.xtc
 the output is
 Checking file traj_comp.xtc
 Reading frame 0 time 3.000
 # Atoms 16867
 Precision 0.001 (nm)
 Last frame 35000 time 10.000

 This trajectory file contains coordinate values from 30ns to 100ns. I tried 
 to calculate the rmsd with this file (both the trr and xtc file) but the 
 graph abruptly starts from 30ns (instead of 0) and continues upto 100ns.For 
 the calculation I need the total trajectory from time 0 to time 100ns.I think 
 I am missing something.

Indeed, you're missing your first trajectory.

You specified -append but if you're changing file names then that won't happen 
and you need to use trjcat afterwards.  But since you haven't told us what the 
initial mdrun command was, there's no way to say what's going on for sure.

-Justin

-- 
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==


  
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with the MDS extended trajectory in GROMACS 5.0.4

2015-07-09 Thread PAULAMI CHATTERJEE
Soumadwip
Thank you very much for your response. So you are suggesting that  
'gmx mdrun -s final_monomer.tpr -v -deffnm md_0_1 -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append'
instead of
'gmx mdrun -s final_monomer.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append' (which I have used for 
the extended simulation)


can solve my problem. I will surely try this one.

Thanks and RegardsPaulami 
 


 On Thursday, 9 July 2015 6:54 PM, soumadwip ghosh 
soumadwipgh...@gmail.com wrote:
   

 Hi,
    Say your initial mdrun command for 30 ns were as follow

grompp_mpi -c npt.gro -p topol.top -n index.ndx -t npt.cpt -o md_0_1.tpr
and
mdrun_mpi -deffnm md_0_1

Then you should get the files such as md_0_1.xtc, md_0_1.log,
md_0_1.edr, md_0_1.cpt, md_0_1.trr and so on

Then you obtain a new tpr file say new_100ns.tpr using tpbconv or gmx
convert with appropriate flags.
.
Now, if you want to extend your simulation by a certain amount of time
and want all your previous files appended the exact command should be
something like


mdrun_mpi -s new_100ns.tpr -v -deffnm md_0_1 -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append


I did it once and coordinates were saved from 0ns all the way to 100ns
and the same md_0_1.xtc, md_0_1.edr etc files were apeended without
any difficulty. I am not quite sure but there's no harm in trying.

Cheers,
Soumadwip
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


  
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with the MDS extended trajectory in Gromacs 5.04

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 3:09 PM, PAULAMI CHATTERJEE wrote:

I have used the following commands for the initial mdrun

gmx grompp -f md.mdp -c npt.gro -t npt.cpt -p topol.top -o md_0_1.tpr
gmx mdrun -deffnm md_0_1

Can you please suggest now what went wrong?



So you have a trajectory named md_0_1.xtc - that should contain the first part 
of the run.  Then somehow you say you've got traj_comp.xtc (though none of the 
commands you've shown would produce a file with that name), so if that's the case:


gmx trjcat -f md_0_1.xtc traj_comp.xtc -o full.xtc

That will have the whole thing.

-Justin


Paulami






On Thursday, 9 July 2015 5:12 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 7/9/15 4:15 AM, PAULAMI CHATTERJEE wrote:
  Dear All,
  I have a 30 ns trajectory which I would like to extend up to 100 ns. For that
I gave the following commands
  gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 7 -o final_monomer.tpr
  gmx mdrun -s final_monomer.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt -append
  After completion of the extension two new trajectory files were generated-
'traj.trr' and 'traj_comp.xtc' . When I tried to check the length of the
trajectory with
  gmxcheck -f traj_comp.xtc
  the output is
  Checking file traj_comp.xtc
  Reading frame 0 time 3.000
  # Atoms 16867
  Precision 0.001 (nm)
  Last frame 35000 time 10.000
 
  This trajectory file contains coordinate values from 30ns to 100ns. I tried
to calculate the rmsd with this file (both the trr and xtc file) but the graph
abruptly starts from 30ns (instead of 0) and continues upto 100ns.For the
calculation I need the total trajectory from time 0 to time 100ns.I think I am
missing something.


Indeed, you're missing your first trajectory.

You specified -append but if you're changing file names then that won't happen
and you need to use trjcat afterwards.  But since you haven't told us what the
initial mdrun command was, there's no way to say what's going on for sure.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu mailto:jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu |
(410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul


==




--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] maintaining stability when uncoupling ion pairs

2015-07-09 Thread andrew biedermann
Hello,

I want to calculate the free energy difference associated with decoupling a
NaCl pair from aqueous solution, but am running into a strange error. I
believe the issue is in how I define the molecule type in the topology
file, since the simulation is stable when removing individual ions, or
during regular production runs with the same mdp settings. I get the
following error soon after submitting the job (5000 steps in):

A list of missing interactions:
LJC Pairs NB of  1 missing  1
  exclusions of  16669 missing  1

Molecule type 'tNC'
the first 10 missing interactions, except for exclusions:
LJC Pairs NB atoms12   global 3 4

---
Program mdrun, VERSION 5.0.4
Source code file:
/nv/blue/amb4ht/downloads/gromacs-5.0.4/src/gromacs/mdlib/domdec_top.c,
line: 394

Fatal error:
2 of the 19448 bonded interactions could not be calculated because some
atoms involved moved further apart than the multi-body cut-off distance
(1.74968 nm) or the two-body cut-off distance (1.74968 nm), see option
-rdd, for pairs and tabulated bonds also see option -ddcheck
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---

I have modified my topology file with the following lines:

[ moleculetype ]
; molnamenrexcl
tNC  1

[ atoms ]
; id   at type res nr   residu name  at name  cg nr  charge
1  Na  1NA   NA1  1.0
2  Cl   1CL   CL2 -1.0

[ bonds ]

[ angles ]

And my mdp file is:

; Run control
integrator   = sd   ; Langevin dynamics
tinit= 0
dt   = 0.002
nsteps   = 500   ; 10 ns
; Output control
nstxout  = 2500
nstvout  = 2500
nstfout  = 0
nstlog   = 2500
nstenergy= 2500
nstxout-compressed   = 0
 Bond parameters
constraint_algorithm= lincs; holonomic constraints
;constraints= h-bonds  ; all bonds (even heavy atom-H
bonds) constrained
;MRS: use h-bonds
lincs_iter  = 2; accuracy of LINCS
lincs_order = 12   ; also related to accuracy
lincs_warnangle = 30
continuation = yes
; Neighborsearching and short-range nonbonded interactions
; Neighborsearching
cutoff-scheme   = Group; Group works with free energy
rlist = 1.2  ;  cut-off distance for the short-range neighbor list
ns_type = grid  ; search neighboring grid cells
nstlist = 10
; Electrostatics
coulombtype  = PME
rcoulomb = 1.2
; van der Waals
vdw-type = Cutoff
vdw-modifier = Potential-switch
rvdw-switch  = 0.90
rvdw = 0.95
; Apply long range dispersion corrections for Energy and Pressure
DispCorr  = EnerPres
; Spacing for the PME/PPPM FFT grid
fourierspacing   = 0.10
; EWALD/PME/PPPM parameters
pme_order= 6
ewald_rtol   = 1e-06
epsilon_surface  = 0
; Temperature coupling
tc-grps = System
tau_t   = 2.0   ; time constant, in ps
ref_t   = 298   ; reference temperature in K
; Pressure coupling is on for NPT
Pcoupl   = Parrinello-Rahman
tau_p= 2.0
compressibility  = 4.5e-05
ref_p= 1.0
;### Free energy control stuff ##
free_energy  = yes
init_lambda_state= 0
delta_lambda = 0
calc_lambda_neighbors= 1; only immediate neighboring windows
; Vectors of lambda specified here
; Each combination is an index that is retrieved from init_lambda_state for
each simulation
; init_lambda_state012345678
910   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20
vdw_lambdas  = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
coul_lambdas = 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80
0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
; We are not transforming any bonded or restrained interactions
bonded_lambdas   = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
restraint_lambdas= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
; Masses are not changing (particle identities are the same at lambda = 0
and lambda = 1)
mass_lambdas = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
; Not doing simulated temperting here

Re: [gmx-users] after extending simulation

2015-07-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 7/9/15 2:16 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

I don’t obtain a .gro file after each extension.
What is wrong?



No idea, only you can see your files and their time stamps.

Pro tip: use -deffnm to always get different file names.  I never append using 
mdrun and this is foolproof (e.g. extending as you are, but with slightly 
different names):


gmx mdrun -deffnm md_1_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.tpr

The nomenclature makes it trivial to loop in a bash script to let the run go as 
long as you like without manual intervention.


-Justin


On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:12 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 7/9/15 2:10 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

So, I’m ok!
I can read the only one .gro file created at the first simulation as the final 
.gro file after all extensions. That’s right?



No, you should get a .gro file at the end of each run.  But that's missing out 
on most of the information; loading the trajectory is of course more 
informative than any single snapshot.

-Justin



On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:58 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 7/9/15 1:49 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

I’m sorry, I miss something with cut and paste command.
On terminal I wrote:

gmx convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o md_0_2.tpr
gmx mdrun -v -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

There is no gromacs coordinate file in VMD, I have to convert a md_0_2.tpr into 
try or try file?



The contents of md_0_1.tpr and md_0_2.tpr are identical except that the latter 
contains a different number of steps.  When providing mdrun with a .cpt file, 
it carries out the run from that point, so the starting point of the run (time 
= 0) is always the same.

The final coordinates are always written to a .gro file unless you specify a 
different format (which your above command does not).  Whatever that file is 
called depends on the first run (md_0_1), because the file names are stored in 
the .cpt file; they will be appended to by default.  The final .gro file has an 
appended name rather than being overwritten, IIRC.

-Justin


On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:38 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 7/9/15 1:25 PM, Andrea Spinelli wrote:

Dear all,
I extend a simulation (GROMACS 5.0.5) with these command lines:

convert-tpr -s md_0_1.tpr -extend 1000 -o next.tpr
mdrun -s md_0_2.tpr -cpi md_0_1.cpt

And now?


Well, the above sequence of commands won't do anything because (1) it's gmx convert-tpr not just 
convert-tpr and (2) if you create next.tpr and try to run md_0_2.tpr then mdrun 
will exit.


What I have to do to view the new .gro file (i use VMD to see it) with new 
state of protein folding simulation?


Load it like any coordinate file.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Andrea Spinelli

Please do not print this email unless really need to.
Save paper, save trees, save space, save money - life matters.



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the 

[gmx-users] echo 15 y 1 1 ...... failed for gmx pdb2gmx with -merge

2015-07-09 Thread Zhang, Cheng
Dear GROMACS researchers,

I was trying to assign the protonation status in one go by the following:


echo 15 y 1 1 1 .. | gmx pdb2gmx -f HC_A227E.pdb -o 
HC_A227E_processed.gro -water spce -inter -ignh -merge interactive


In the commandline above, the .. means the protonation status for 
different chargeable residues.


Because I have an inter-chain disulfide bond in my two-chain protein, I have to 
use -merge to keep this inter-chain disulfide bond. The second interactive 
prompt is to ask if I want to merge these two chains. So my answer is y. 
However, it seems that the echo command could not be recognised if y is 
used and I got the following error message:



Merge chain ending with residue CYS214 (chain id 'L', atom 3258 SG) and chain 
starting with

residue GLU215 (chain id 'H', atom 3263 N) into a single moleculetype (keeping 
termini)? [n/y]

---

Program gmx, VERSION 5.0.4

Source code file: 
/home/lanselibai/Cheng/gromacs-5.0.4/src/gromacs/gmxpreprocess/pdb2gmx.c, line: 
1571

Fatal error:

Error reading from stdin

For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS

website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors

---



So can I ask how to use echo to merge chains so that I can assign protonation 
status in one go?


Thank you very much.


Yours sincerely

Cheng
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

2015-07-09 Thread asaffarhi

Dear Natalie,

What I can say is that e.g Thermodynamic Integration should give the  
free energy difference of this transformation. If you are interested  
in the free energy of binding the link provided to you by Hannes  
Loeffler may be useful. Also, for such a k value in case you will need  
analytic equations it will be better to use the exact equations (the  
equations in this link are approximate). I'll supply an exact equation  
if you'll need for the free energy of a dihedral harmonic term.


I hope to have more time next week and give more details (the weekend  
starts here).


Best regards,
Asaf

I hope to have more time next week and to try

Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:


Dear Asaf,

Thank you again for putting in the time to respond to me so quickly.
What I have been trying to do was start from a system that is not  
restrained and grow the restraints onto the ligand, measuring the  
change in free energy of this. The harmonic restraints used are that  
of the umbrella pull code with a force constant of k= 1000  
kJ/mol*nm^2. It is mentioned In the Gromacs manual for mdp options  
that the pull code can be controlled with restraint-lambdas, but  
there is not much detail other than this. I imagine that lambda =0  
would represent a nonexistent potential with k= 0 and at lambda = 1  
a full strength potential would be imposed.

Please feel free to ask me to add more detail!

Warm regards,
Natalie


From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se  
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of  
asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:38 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Natalie,

You are welcome.
Could you please explain in more detail so maybe I can help?
Do you want to change the strength of the restraints and measure the
free energy difference associated with this change?

Thanks. p.s there is also http://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.1620v7.pdf with
the same equations.

Best regards,
Asaf

Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:


Dear Asaf,

Thank you for the quick reply!

I was wondering if it was possible to use thermodynamic integration
to represent growing harmonic restraints aside from using an
analytical method.

I will cite this article most definitely!

Natalie Nguyen


From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of
asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il asaffa...@post.tau.ac.il
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:45 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Free energy change with harmonic restraints

Dear Natalie,

You have in

http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1502.07196v3.pdf

exact free energy of harmonic covalent bond and bond angle terms (or
restrains). See Eqs. (2) and (3).

There are also previous studies in the references there.

For the dihedral term I assume it can also be calculated exactly (I
might upload it).

There is also to think if there are other contributions.

If you are using it please cite.

Best regards,
Asaf


Quoting Natalie Nguyen nguy...@wittenberg.edu:


Dear all,


I am trying to measure the free energy change associated with
adding/removing harmonic restraints imposed on a ligand that is
attached to a protein. Is there any way to set this up?


Thank you ahead of time!


Natalie Nguyen
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.




--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at  
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before  
posting!


* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users  
or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

--
Gromacs Users mailing list