[gmx-users] How to create a spherocylindrical wall
Hi I would like to perform a simulation ( without any periodic boundary condition) where I need to have a wall of spherocylindrical geometry. In other words the particles will be confined inside a spherocylinder. Is there any good suggestion on how to achieve that in gromacs? 1) One option I thought of achieving that is by having a spherocylindrical wall potential. Is there a way of putting the wall potential in the form of a table-potential ? (Not sure cylinder option in gromacs umbrella sampling not going to be helpful). 2) Or,should I put a bunch of hard sphere which constitute the spherocylindrical boundary so that the particles inside the spherocylinder will have a repulsive interaction each time they come towards the boundary ? Thanks Jagannath -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] g_hbond
Dear all I have used g_hbond with -hbn -hbm flag to get .ndx file and .xpm file. Then with xpm2ps I converted .xpm to .eps file. I get half the number of rows in .eps file as compared to .ndx file. when using Justins perl script I got summary of existence file and here 12 bonds are shown but in .eps file only 6 rows are plotted. I know that the bonds are plotted in reverse order but here only half number of bonds are plotted in .eps file. please help to resolve this issue. shahid -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] gromacs-5.1 with charmm36.ff
Thanks for the quick response - that fixed my problem Krzysztof On 9/10/15 5:36 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 9/10/15 6:17 PM, Krzysztof Kuczera wrote: Hi I have run into a strange problem when making an urea+tip3p water box When trying to set up an energy minimization with gromacs-5.1 I get a grompp error: Program gmx grompp, VERSION 5.1 Source code file: /home/kuczera/prog/gromacs-5.1/src/gromacs/gmxpreprocess/toppush.c, line: 908 Fatal error: Unknown bond_atomtype cn9 Here is the strangeness: - grompp and mdrun work OK with version 5.0.4 - I am using the same force field since winter - from charmm36-nov2014.ff.tar, which I add manually to the successive 5.x directories as I upgrade the GROMACS versions - my system only has UREA and TIP3P, which do not contain atom names or types = CN9 looking in the CHARMM36 merged.rtp file shows that CN9 atoms are in nucleic acids Please get the latest version of the force field from our website. There have been changes related to case sensitivity in the code, and I have updated the force field files accordingly. http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/charmm_ff.shtml#gromacs -Justin -- Krzysztof Kuczera Departments of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences The University of Kansas 1251 Wescoe Hall Drive, 5090 Malott Hall Lawrence, KS 66045 Tel: 785-864-5060 Fax: 785-864-5396 email: kkucz...@ku.edu http://oolung.chem.ku.edu/~kuczera/home.html -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Cyclic peptide by using specbond.dat
This does not seem related with specbond.dat, but rather a problem with the chains: each residue is a different chain and maybe that is causing troubles with the termini. Remove the chain ID or make them all chain A. João On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Nikhil Maroliwrote: > *Dear Gromacs users* > *i have been having a bit of issues generating accurate topology for cyclic > peptide* > > *i added extra terms in specbond.dat (Last Line)* > *as * > > 9 > > CYS SG 1 CYS SG 1 0.2 CYS2 CYS2 > > CYS SG 1 HEM FE 2 0.25 CYS2 HEME > > CYS SG 1 HEM CAB 1 0.18 CYS2 HEME > > CYS SG 1 HEM CAC 1 0.18 CYS2 HEME > > HIS NE2 1 HEM FE 1 0.2 HIS1 HEME > > MET SD 1 HEM FE 1 0.24 MET HEME > > CO C 1 HEMEFE 1 0.19CO HEME > CYM SG 1 CYM SG 1 0.2 CYS2CYS2 > > *LYS C 1 ALA N 1 0.135 LYS ALA* > > > and my pdb file is as > SEQRES 1 A4 ALA LEU GLN LYS > LINK N ALA A 1 C LYS A 4 > 1.34 > ATOM 1 N ALA A 1 -7.317 -0.819 1.765 1.00 0.00 > N > ATOM 2 H ALA A 1 -6.725 -1.565 2.103 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 3 CA ALA A 1 -6.768 0.542 1.865 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 4 HA ALA A 1 -7.224 1.212 1.142 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 5 C ALA A 1 -5.244 0.544 1.585 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 6 O ALA A 1 -4.449 0.351 2.495 1.00 0.00 > O > ATOM 7 CB ALA A 1 -7.092 1.097 3.262 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 8 HB1 ALA A 1 -6.673 0.442 4.029 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 9 HB1 ALA A 1 -8.168 1.171 3.407 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 10 HB1 ALA A 1 -6.651 2.089 3.375 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 11 N LEU B 2 -4.781 0.766 0.348 1.00 0.00 > N > ATOM 12 H LEU B 2 -3.776 0.718 0.265 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 13 CA LEU B 2 -5.549 0.859 -0.902 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 14 HA LEU B 2 -6.305 1.635 -0.790 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 15 C LEU B 2 -6.247 -0.477 -1.208 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 16 O LEU B 2 -5.673 -1.538 -0.993 1.00 0.00 > O > ATOM 17 CB LEU B 2 -4.589 1.279 -2.034 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 18 HB1 LEU B 2 -4.111 2.220 -1.754 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 19 HB1 LEU B 2 -3.807 0.520 -2.117 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 20 CG LEU B 2 -5.238 1.454 -3.426 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 21 HG LEU B 2 -5.676 0.505 -3.738 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 22 CD1 LEU B 2 -6.340 2.525 -3.427 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 23 HD11 LEU B 2 -6.723 2.656 -4.440 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 24 HD12 LEU B 2 -5.940 3.476 -3.074 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 25 HD13 LEU B 2 -7.169 2.224 -2.789 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 26 CD2 LEU B 2 -4.160 1.833 -4.450 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 27 HD21 LEU B 2 -4.605 1.920 -5.442 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 28 HD22 LEU B 2 -3.391 1.060 -4.482 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 29 HD23 LEU B 2 -3.700 2.785 -4.180 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 30 N GLN C 3 -7.497 -0.424 -1.671 1.00 0.00 > N > ATOM 31 H GLN C 3 -7.910 0.469 -1.882 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 32 CA GLN C 3 -8.323 -1.613 -1.897 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 33 HA GLN C 3 -8.020 -2.397 -1.198 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 34 C GLN C 3 -9.820 -1.324 -1.624 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 35 O GLN C 3 -10.666 -1.591 -2.471 1.00 0.00 > O > ATOM 36 CB GLN C 3 -8.045 -2.130 -3.325 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 37 HB1 GLN C 3 -8.470 -1.427 -4.044 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 38 HB2 GLN C 3 -6.967 -2.154 -3.497 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 39 CG GLN C 3 -8.587 -3.552 -3.580 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 40 HG1 GLN C 3 -7.751 -4.250 -3.637 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 41 HG1 GLN C 3 -9.225 -3.868 -2.754 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 42 CD GLN C 3 -9.400 -3.641 -4.869 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 43 OE1 GLN C 3 -8.993 -4.228 -5.857 1.00 0.00 > O > ATOM 44 NE2 GLN C 3 -10.567 -3.038 -4.913 1.00 0.00 > N > ATOM 45 HE21 GLN C 3 -11.082 -3.101 -5.769 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 46 HE22 GLN C 3 -10.883 -2.515 -4.103 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 47 N LYS D 4 -10.243 -0.726 -0.500 1.00 0.00 > N > ATOM 48 H LYS D 4 -11.247 -0.617 -0.471 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 49 CA LYS D 4 -9.503 -0.233 0.679 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 50 HA LYS D 4 -8.973 0.661 0.371 1.00 0.00 > H > ATOM 51 C LYS D 4 -8.483 -1.241 1.259 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM 52 O LYS D 4 -8.735 -2.437 1.259 1.00 0.00 > O > ATOM 53 CB LYS D 4 -10.517 0.166 1.774 1.00 0.00 > C > ATOM
Re: [gmx-users] Cyclic peptide by using specbond.dat
Hi, Yes, that's exactly what parts of the output are saying. Mark On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:45 João M. Damaswrote: > This does not seem related with specbond.dat, but rather a problem with the > chains: each residue is a different chain and maybe that is causing > troubles with the termini. Remove the chain ID or make them all chain A. > > João > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Nikhil Maroli > wrote: > > > *Dear Gromacs users* > > *i have been having a bit of issues generating accurate topology for > cyclic > > peptide* > > > > *i added extra terms in specbond.dat (Last Line)* > > *as * > > > > 9 > > > > CYS SG 1 CYS SG 1 0.2 CYS2 CYS2 > > > > CYS SG 1 HEM FE 2 0.25 CYS2 HEME > > > > CYS SG 1 HEM CAB 1 0.18 CYS2 HEME > > > > CYS SG 1 HEM CAC 1 0.18 CYS2 HEME > > > > HIS NE2 1 HEM FE 1 0.2 HIS1 HEME > > > > MET SD 1 HEM FE 1 0.24 MET HEME > > > > CO C 1 HEMEFE 1 0.19CO HEME > > CYM SG 1 CYM SG 1 0.2 CYS2CYS2 > > > > *LYS C 1 ALA N 1 0.135 LYS ALA* > > > > > > and my pdb file is as > > SEQRES 1 A4 ALA LEU GLN LYS > > LINK N ALA A 1 C LYS A 4 > > 1.34 > > ATOM 1 N ALA A 1 -7.317 -0.819 1.765 1.00 0.00 > > N > > ATOM 2 H ALA A 1 -6.725 -1.565 2.103 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 3 CA ALA A 1 -6.768 0.542 1.865 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 4 HA ALA A 1 -7.224 1.212 1.142 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 5 C ALA A 1 -5.244 0.544 1.585 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 6 O ALA A 1 -4.449 0.351 2.495 1.00 0.00 > > O > > ATOM 7 CB ALA A 1 -7.092 1.097 3.262 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 8 HB1 ALA A 1 -6.673 0.442 4.029 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 9 HB1 ALA A 1 -8.168 1.171 3.407 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 10 HB1 ALA A 1 -6.651 2.089 3.375 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 11 N LEU B 2 -4.781 0.766 0.348 1.00 0.00 > > N > > ATOM 12 H LEU B 2 -3.776 0.718 0.265 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 13 CA LEU B 2 -5.549 0.859 -0.902 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 14 HA LEU B 2 -6.305 1.635 -0.790 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 15 C LEU B 2 -6.247 -0.477 -1.208 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 16 O LEU B 2 -5.673 -1.538 -0.993 1.00 0.00 > > O > > ATOM 17 CB LEU B 2 -4.589 1.279 -2.034 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 18 HB1 LEU B 2 -4.111 2.220 -1.754 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 19 HB1 LEU B 2 -3.807 0.520 -2.117 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 20 CG LEU B 2 -5.238 1.454 -3.426 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 21 HG LEU B 2 -5.676 0.505 -3.738 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 22 CD1 LEU B 2 -6.340 2.525 -3.427 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 23 HD11 LEU B 2 -6.723 2.656 -4.440 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 24 HD12 LEU B 2 -5.940 3.476 -3.074 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 25 HD13 LEU B 2 -7.169 2.224 -2.789 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 26 CD2 LEU B 2 -4.160 1.833 -4.450 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 27 HD21 LEU B 2 -4.605 1.920 -5.442 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 28 HD22 LEU B 2 -3.391 1.060 -4.482 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 29 HD23 LEU B 2 -3.700 2.785 -4.180 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 30 N GLN C 3 -7.497 -0.424 -1.671 1.00 0.00 > > N > > ATOM 31 H GLN C 3 -7.910 0.469 -1.882 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 32 CA GLN C 3 -8.323 -1.613 -1.897 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 33 HA GLN C 3 -8.020 -2.397 -1.198 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 34 C GLN C 3 -9.820 -1.324 -1.624 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 35 O GLN C 3 -10.666 -1.591 -2.471 1.00 0.00 > > O > > ATOM 36 CB GLN C 3 -8.045 -2.130 -3.325 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 37 HB1 GLN C 3 -8.470 -1.427 -4.044 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 38 HB2 GLN C 3 -6.967 -2.154 -3.497 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 39 CG GLN C 3 -8.587 -3.552 -3.580 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 40 HG1 GLN C 3 -7.751 -4.250 -3.637 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 41 HG1 GLN C 3 -9.225 -3.868 -2.754 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 42 CD GLN C 3 -9.400 -3.641 -4.869 1.00 0.00 > > C > > ATOM 43 OE1 GLN C 3 -8.993 -4.228 -5.857 1.00 0.00 > > O > > ATOM 44 NE2 GLN C 3 -10.567 -3.038 -4.913 1.00 0.00 > > N > > ATOM 45 HE21 GLN C 3 -11.082 -3.101 -5.769 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 46 HE22 GLN C 3 -10.883 -2.515 -4.103 1.00 0.00 > > H > > ATOM 47 N LYS D 4 -10.243 -0.726 -0.500 1.00 0.00 > > N > > ATOM 48 H LYS D 4 -11.247 -0.617
[gmx-users] Protein-ligand interaction calculation
Hello, I have simulated (REMD simulation) a protein complexed with a ligand and wanted to know if there is any option for calculating the non bonded energies between the protein and the ligand (throughout the entire simulation). Thanks you in advance, Michael. -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 137, Issue 61
Thanks Mark and Joao I'm able to make peptide bond for the Cyclic peptide using specbond.dat but there is a additional Oxygen and Hydrogen atom on the Carbon and Nitrogen atom.when i run pdb2gmx selected Amber forcefield it didnt ask for the terminals and created topology with amid bond for the cyclic ring.but when i select the CHARMM forcefield it asking for the terminals and selected NONE but it shows the error even after done as you said before ( Remove the chain ID or make them all chain A. ) *There is a dangling bond at at least one of the terminal ends. Fix yourcoordinate file, add a new terminal database entry (.tdb), or select the proper existing terminal entry.**For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS* Thanks -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Protein-ligand interaction calculation
On 9/11/15 9:46 AM, michael zhenin wrote: Hello, I have simulated (REMD simulation) a protein complexed with a ligand and wanted to know if there is any option for calculating the non bonded energies between the protein and the ligand (throughout the entire simulation). Use energygrps in the .mdp file, regenerate new .tpr, and use mdrun -rerun on the existing trajectories. -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] g_hbond
On 9/11/15 2:43 AM, Shahid Nayeem wrote: Dear all I have used g_hbond with -hbn -hbm flag to get .ndx file and .xpm file. Then with xpm2ps I converted .xpm to .eps file. I get half the number of rows in .eps file as compared to .ndx file. when using Justins perl script I got summary of existence file and here 12 bonds are shown but in .eps file only 6 rows are plotted. I know that the bonds are plotted in reverse order but here only half number of bonds are plotted in .eps file. please help to resolve this issue. You're probably looking at the wrong entry in the index file. Hard to imagine these could be mismatched. -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] How to create a spherocylindrical wall
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 11:57 +0530, Jagannath Mondal wrote: > Hi > I would like to perform a simulation ( without any periodic > boundary > condition) where I need to have a wall of spherocylindrical geometry. > In > other words the particles will be confined inside a spherocylinder. > > Is there any good suggestion on how to achieve that in gromacs? > > 1) One option I thought of achieving that is by having a > spherocylindrical > wall potential. Is there a way of putting the wall potential in the > form > of a table-potential ? (Not sure cylinder option in gromacs umbrella > sampling not going to be helpful). This might be do-able and would not require a table potential. Check out flat-bottom restraints in section 4.3.2 in the reference (PDF) manual. > > 2) Or,should I put a bunch of hard sphere which constitute the > spherocylindrical boundary so that the particles inside the > spherocylinder > will have a repulsive interaction each time they come towards the > boundary ? I'm not sure how you would implement this in a simple way with GROMACS. -- James “Wes” Barnett, Ph.D. Candidate Louisiana Board of Regents Fellow Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Tulane University 341-B Lindy Boggs Center for Energy and Biotechnology 6823 St. Charles Ave New Orleans, Louisiana 70118-5674 jbarn...@tulane.ed -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Creating a box of water with density 1000 g/l
On 9/11/15 11:46 AM, Ebert Maximilian wrote: Thanks for the reply. I think I can simulate it now. The only thing I don’t understand and this is in reference to my other post: OPLS/AA parameters for 2-propanol How can the self-diffusion coefficient be a good measure for testing my parameters if for TIP3P water the self-diffusion coefficient ist 6 x 10^-9 m2 s-1 but the experimental value is around 2.3 x 10^-9 m2 s-1. So if even for a highly used water model the coefficient doesn’t fit how can I make any assumption about the quality of my parameters for 2-propanol? Just because one molecule has flawed parameters doesn't mean you shouldn't consider this as viable target data for other molecules. Diffusion constant is but one of many properties you need to look at if you want a valid model of propanol (or any molecule) - neat liquid structure, density, diffusion, DHvap, dipole moment, etc. -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] miscelle formation using ligands only
I am using gromacs for the first time . I have installed gromacs 5.0.4 version and i want to check a miscelle is formed or not using 5 different ligands in different ratios. I have gone through all basic tutorials on how to use gromacs ( lysosyme,protein-ligand). But i am stuck with the problem of having ligands only for simulation due to no force field and topology file. I have tried to use packmol to pack a cubic box with all my different ligands in different ratios and generated a pdb file but without making a topology file i am stuck. So if some one can suggest some possible ways of doing it and i don't have much computational background of manipulating various file extensions of gromacs. -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
[gmx-users] Cyclic peptide by using specbond.dat
*Dear Gromacs users* *i have been having a bit of issues generating accurate topology for cyclic peptide* *i added extra terms in specbond.dat (Last Line)* *as * 9 CYS SG 1 CYS SG 1 0.2 CYS2 CYS2 CYS SG 1 HEM FE 2 0.25 CYS2 HEME CYS SG 1 HEM CAB 1 0.18 CYS2 HEME CYS SG 1 HEM CAC 1 0.18 CYS2 HEME HIS NE2 1 HEM FE 1 0.2 HIS1 HEME MET SD 1 HEM FE 1 0.24 MET HEME CO C 1 HEMEFE 1 0.19CO HEME CYM SG 1 CYM SG 1 0.2 CYS2CYS2 *LYS C 1 ALA N 1 0.135 LYS ALA* and my pdb file is as SEQRES 1 A4 ALA LEU GLN LYS LINK N ALA A 1 C LYS A 4 1.34 ATOM 1 N ALA A 1 -7.317 -0.819 1.765 1.00 0.00 N ATOM 2 H ALA A 1 -6.725 -1.565 2.103 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 3 CA ALA A 1 -6.768 0.542 1.865 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 4 HA ALA A 1 -7.224 1.212 1.142 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 5 C ALA A 1 -5.244 0.544 1.585 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 6 O ALA A 1 -4.449 0.351 2.495 1.00 0.00 O ATOM 7 CB ALA A 1 -7.092 1.097 3.262 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 8 HB1 ALA A 1 -6.673 0.442 4.029 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 9 HB1 ALA A 1 -8.168 1.171 3.407 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 10 HB1 ALA A 1 -6.651 2.089 3.375 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 11 N LEU B 2 -4.781 0.766 0.348 1.00 0.00 N ATOM 12 H LEU B 2 -3.776 0.718 0.265 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 13 CA LEU B 2 -5.549 0.859 -0.902 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 14 HA LEU B 2 -6.305 1.635 -0.790 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 15 C LEU B 2 -6.247 -0.477 -1.208 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 16 O LEU B 2 -5.673 -1.538 -0.993 1.00 0.00 O ATOM 17 CB LEU B 2 -4.589 1.279 -2.034 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 18 HB1 LEU B 2 -4.111 2.220 -1.754 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 19 HB1 LEU B 2 -3.807 0.520 -2.117 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 20 CG LEU B 2 -5.238 1.454 -3.426 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 21 HG LEU B 2 -5.676 0.505 -3.738 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 22 CD1 LEU B 2 -6.340 2.525 -3.427 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 23 HD11 LEU B 2 -6.723 2.656 -4.440 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 24 HD12 LEU B 2 -5.940 3.476 -3.074 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 25 HD13 LEU B 2 -7.169 2.224 -2.789 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 26 CD2 LEU B 2 -4.160 1.833 -4.450 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 27 HD21 LEU B 2 -4.605 1.920 -5.442 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 28 HD22 LEU B 2 -3.391 1.060 -4.482 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 29 HD23 LEU B 2 -3.700 2.785 -4.180 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 30 N GLN C 3 -7.497 -0.424 -1.671 1.00 0.00 N ATOM 31 H GLN C 3 -7.910 0.469 -1.882 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 32 CA GLN C 3 -8.323 -1.613 -1.897 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 33 HA GLN C 3 -8.020 -2.397 -1.198 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 34 C GLN C 3 -9.820 -1.324 -1.624 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 35 O GLN C 3 -10.666 -1.591 -2.471 1.00 0.00 O ATOM 36 CB GLN C 3 -8.045 -2.130 -3.325 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 37 HB1 GLN C 3 -8.470 -1.427 -4.044 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 38 HB2 GLN C 3 -6.967 -2.154 -3.497 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 39 CG GLN C 3 -8.587 -3.552 -3.580 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 40 HG1 GLN C 3 -7.751 -4.250 -3.637 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 41 HG1 GLN C 3 -9.225 -3.868 -2.754 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 42 CD GLN C 3 -9.400 -3.641 -4.869 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 43 OE1 GLN C 3 -8.993 -4.228 -5.857 1.00 0.00 O ATOM 44 NE2 GLN C 3 -10.567 -3.038 -4.913 1.00 0.00 N ATOM 45 HE21 GLN C 3 -11.082 -3.101 -5.769 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 46 HE22 GLN C 3 -10.883 -2.515 -4.103 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 47 N LYS D 4 -10.243 -0.726 -0.500 1.00 0.00 N ATOM 48 H LYS D 4 -11.247 -0.617 -0.471 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 49 CA LYS D 4 -9.503 -0.233 0.679 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 50 HA LYS D 4 -8.973 0.661 0.371 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 51 C LYS D 4 -8.483 -1.241 1.259 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 52 O LYS D 4 -8.735 -2.437 1.259 1.00 0.00 O ATOM 53 CB LYS D 4 -10.517 0.166 1.774 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 54 HB1 LYS D 4 -11.377 -0.504 1.744 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 55 HB2 LYS D 4 -10.054 0.023 2.751 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 56 CG LYS D 4 -10.987 1.632 1.713 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 57 HG1 LYS D 4 -11.669 1.806 2.546 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 58 HG2 LYS D 4 -10.120 2.277 1.858 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 59 CD LYS D 4 -11.688 2.059 0.416 1.00 0.00 C ATOM 60 HD1 LYS D 4 -11.973 3.108 0.503 1.00 0.00 H ATOM 61 HD2 LYS D 4 -10.998 1.963 -0.422 1.00 0.00 H