Re: [gmx-users] Results of villin headpiece with AMD 8 core

2019-01-12 Thread paul buscemi
Mirco,on the modification - nicely done.On the system speed,  running Maestro-Desmond  one core ) the 1080ti is pegged and at usually 90% power.  them folks at Schrodinger know what they are doing. So the base speed is apparently sufficient, its some other factor  e.g. the work load distribution that is not optimized.I’ll work with your files tomorrow and let you know how it turns out— thanks Have a a great weekendPaulOn Jan 12, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Wahab Mirco  wrote:Hi Paul,thanks for your reply.On 11.01.2019 23:20, paul buscemi wrote:Getting the ion and SOL concentration correct in the top is trickier ( for me ) than it should have been,   If you happen to  reuse  both  solvate and genion during  the build  keeping track of the top is like using a digital rubics cube..!  The charge  the villin was +1 because after I downloaded it from the pdb I removed all other water and ions - it just made pdb2gmx easier to work with.I simply hand-edited the .gro by making up two ions and put themsomewhere near the corners and added a short energy minimization.Then, I added one line in the .top for the ions.The 1080 scaled nicely with the 1080 ti,  these are really nice pieces of hardware. and you are correct, given the choice of increased processors vs  faster processors - choose the latter. I have the AMD OC to 4.0 GH and it runs the same model almost as fast as as 32 core AMD at 3.7 GHz.Your system is possibly too slow to saturate the 1080Ti at this smallsystem size. In a much larger system, the lead of the 1080 Ti over the1080 may possibly reach the theoretical expectation.I've run 300k DPPC models ( ~300 DPPC molecules ) and they run at ~15 ns/day in NPT.  And yes,  if you can send the pdb, top, and itps I’t would be interesting to compare the two AMDs.I did upload the stuff here + a readme-file. This system is much toolarge for a single box + GPU (for productive runs), but maybe in 5 yearsor so we can watch capillary waves through connected IMD/VMD in real-time ;)=> http://suwos.gibtsfei.net/d.dppc.4096.zipRegardsMirco-- Gromacs Users mailing list* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists* For (un)subscribe requests visithttps://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] Results of villin headpiece with AMD 8 core

2019-01-12 Thread paul buscemi
Mirco,

on the modification - nicely done.
On the system speed,  running Maestro-Desmond  one core ) the 1080ti is pegged 
and at usually 90% power.  them folks at Schrodinger know what they are doing. 
So the base speed is apparently sufficient, its some other factor  e.g. the 
work load distribution that is not optimized.

I’ll work with your files tomorrow and let you know how it turns out— thanks 

Have a a great weekend

Paul

> On Jan 12, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Wahab Mirco  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> thanks for your reply.
> 
> On 11.01.2019 23:20, paul buscemi wrote:
>> Getting the ion and SOL concentration correct in the top is trickier ( for 
>> me ) than it should have been,   If you happen to  reuse  both  solvate and 
>> genion during  the build  keeping track of the top is like using a digital 
>> rubics cube..!  The charge  the villin was +1 because after I downloaded it 
>> from the pdb I removed all other water and ions - it just made pdb2gmx 
>> easier to work with.
>> 
> 
> I simply hand-edited the .gro by making up two ions and put them
> somewhere near the corners and added a short energy minimization.
> Then, I added one line in the .top for the ions.
> 
>> The 1080 scaled nicely with the 1080 ti,  these are really nice pieces of 
>> hardware. and you are correct, given the choice of increased processors vs  
>> faster processors - choose the latter. I have the AMD OC to 4.0 GH and it 
>> runs the same model almost as fast as as 32 core AMD at 3.7 GHz.
> 
> Your system is possibly too slow to saturate the 1080Ti at this small
> system size. In a much larger system, the lead of the 1080 Ti over the
> 1080 may possibly reach the theoretical expectation.
> 
>> I've run 300k DPPC models ( ~300 DPPC molecules ) and they run at ~15 ns/day 
>> in NPT.  And yes,  if you can send the pdb, top, and itps I’t would be 
>> interesting to compare the two AMDs.
>> 
> 
> I did upload the stuff here + a readme-file. This system is much too
> large for a single box + GPU (for productive runs), but maybe in 5 years
> or so we can watch capillary waves through connected IMD/VMD in real-
> time ;)
> 
> => http://suwos.gibtsfei.net/d.dppc.4096.zip
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mirco
> 
> -- 
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
> mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] REMD Plots

2019-01-12 Thread Shan Jayasinghe
Hi Joel,

Thank you very much.



On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 3:27 PM Joel Awuah  wrote:

> Hi Shan,
> I am not quite sure if you want to generate an REMD simulation mobility in
> temperature space for the 30 replicas. If that be the case, then you can
> use the data in the replica_temperature.xvg file to plot replica index vs
> REMD steps. The 1st column in the file corresponds to the REMD steps and
> 2nd to 31st correspond to the mobility of replicas 0 to 29.
>
> Hope this  helps?
>
> cheers
> Joel
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 13:23, Shan Jayasinghe  >
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Gromacs users,
> >
> > How do we plot a graph for temperature vs swap step number using a REMD
> > simulation with 30 systems. I already generated the replica_temp.xvg and
> > replica_index.xvg files using demux.pl script.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Shan Jayasinghe
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> >
>
>
> --
> Joel Baffour Awuah
> PhD Candidate
> *Institute for Frontier Materials*
>
> *Deakin University*
> *Waurn Ponds, 3126 VIC*
> *Australia +61450070635*
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shan Jayasinghe
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] Results of villin headpiece with AMD 8 core

2019-01-12 Thread Wahab Mirco
Hi Paul,

thanks for your reply.

On 11.01.2019 23:20, paul buscemi wrote:
> Getting the ion and SOL concentration correct in the top is trickier ( for me 
> ) than it should have been,   If you happen to  reuse  both  solvate and 
> genion during  the build  keeping track of the top is like using a digital 
> rubics cube..!  The charge  the villin was +1 because after I downloaded it 
> from the pdb I removed all other water and ions - it just made pdb2gmx easier 
> to work with.
> 

I simply hand-edited the .gro by making up two ions and put them
somewhere near the corners and added a short energy minimization.
Then, I added one line in the .top for the ions.

> The 1080 scaled nicely with the 1080 ti,  these are really nice pieces of 
> hardware. and you are correct, given the choice of increased processors vs  
> faster processors - choose the latter. I have the AMD OC to 4.0 GH and it 
> runs the same model almost as fast as as 32 core AMD at 3.7 GHz.

Your system is possibly too slow to saturate the 1080Ti at this small
system size. In a much larger system, the lead of the 1080 Ti over the
1080 may possibly reach the theoretical expectation.

> I've run 300k DPPC models ( ~300 DPPC molecules ) and they run at ~15 ns/day 
> in NPT.  And yes,  if you can send the pdb, top, and itps I’t would be 
> interesting to compare the two AMDs.
> 

I did upload the stuff here + a readme-file. This system is much too
large for a single box + GPU (for productive runs), but maybe in 5 years
or so we can watch capillary waves through connected IMD/VMD in real-
time ;)

=> http://suwos.gibtsfei.net/d.dppc.4096.zip

Regards

Mirco

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] Changing mdp options for a restart

2019-01-12 Thread dgfd dgdfg
http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/current/user-guide/managing-simulations.html#changing-mdp-options-for-a-restart
  

I tried to simulate instantaneous perturbation in topology and did everything 
as in instruction (below).

Changing mdp options for a restart
If you wish to make changes to your simulations settings other than length, 
then you should do so in the  mdp file or topology, and then call
gmx grompp -f possibly-changed.mdp -p possibly-changed.top -c state.cpt -o 
new.tpr
gmx mdrun -s new.tpr -cpi state.cpt
to instruct  gmx grompp to copy the full-precision coordinates in the 
checkpoint file into the new  tpr file. You should consider your choices for  
tinit ,  init-step ,  nsteps and  simulation-part . You should generally not 
regenerate velocities with  gen-vel , and generally select  continuation so 
that constraints are not re-applied before the first integration step. My steps 
are:

gmx grompp -f -p -c 4-daspi-S0.gro -o S0    ; old topology compilation
gmx mdrun -v -deffnm S0 ; old run
gmx grompp -f grompp-S1.mdp -p topol-S1.top -c S0.cpt -o S1   ; here begins 
actual part

But I got error message from "gmx grompp, version 2019"

Error in user input:
Invalid command-line options
  In command-line option -c
    File name 'S0.cpt' cannot be used for this option.
    Only the following extensions are possible:
  .gro, .g96, .pdb, .brk, .ent, .esp, .tpr

What is the reason of mistake, or something wrong in manual?
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

[gmx-users] Single precision enough for MD of peptide?

2019-01-12 Thread Neena Susan Eappen
Hi GMX users,


I just installed GROMACS 2018.4 on my windows PC without GPU support. My PC is 
capable of only single precision with a 64-bit memory, would this affect the 
trajectory of my peptide?


Many thanks,

Neena
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.