Hi,
In short, this works for every combination. But with the big disadvantage
of being very slow and not using our precious little gpu´s.
Thanks for your fast reply Mark.
> Hi,
>
> What happens in your failing cases (or even all of them) when adding -nb
> cpu, to force the run off the GPU?
>
> Mark
>
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:02 Yannic Alber <yannic.al...@tu-dortmund.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> we struggle to get a TI on our computer running. The specifications are
>> listed below. As you can see, its a two socket, two graphics cards
>> machine. Therefore, the plan is to run two simulations in parallel. But
>> we
>> can't get a single one to run.
>>
>> Running on 1 node with total 20 cores, 20 logical cores, 2 compatible
>> GPUs
>> Hardware detected:
>> CPU info:
>> Vendor: GenuineIntel
>> Brand: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz
>> SIMD instructions most likely to fit this hardware: AVX2_256
>> SIMD instructions selected at GROMACS compile time: AVX2_256
>> GPU info:
>> Number of GPUs detected: 2
>> #0: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, compute cap.: 6.1, ECC: no, stat:
>> compatible
>> #1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, compute cap.: 6.1, ECC: no, stat:
>> compatible
>>
>> The simulation system in question is a protein-ligand-complex in
>> TIP3P-water and amber ff99SB as force field.
>>
>> Now lets get into the messy details. We tried different mdrun
>> commandline
>> argument rotations, for example:
>>
>> gmx mdrun -s md.tpr -pin on -ntomp 2 -ntmpi 5 -gpu_id 0 -deffnm md
>> (does not work)
>> gmx mdrun -s md.tpr -pin on -ntomp 5 -ntmpi 2 -gpu_id 00 -deffnm md
>> (does not work)
>> gmx mdrun -s md.tpr -pin on -ntomp 10 -ntmpi 1 -gpu_id 0 -deffnm md
>> (does not work)
>> gmx mdrun -s md.tpr -deffnm md
>> (does work, uses the complete compute node including the both gpu´s)
>>
>> The error which gromacs gives us, is rather irritating (explanation
>> follows further down). Here a little excerpt:
>>
>> Step 191, time 0.382 (ps) LINCS WARNING
>> relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
>> rms 0.02, max 0.10 (between atoms 3421 and 3424)
>> bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
>> atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
>>3702 3703 31.00.1090 0.1090 0.1090
>> Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
>>
>> These errors vary, but refer all to a misplacement or unusual rotations.
>> Gromacs states, that this is because of our "unstable" system. However,
>> this explanation can be excluded, because the starting configuration of
>> the
>> simulations in question already ran 20 ns in gromacs on a CPU-Cluster.
>>
>> We also tested different commands for cmake. A example is shown here:
>>
>> cmake .. -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++ -DGMX_GPU=on
>> -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=fftw3 -DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON
>> -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD=ON
>>
>> Compilerwise we tried gcc (v.4.8.5) and intel (v.15.0.1).
>>
>> I would really appreciate your help and thank you very much in advance.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Yannic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>>
>
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
