Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-04-02 Thread Erik Marklund
Dear Irem,

You may want to run the trajectory through trjconv and translate it, or use 
e.g. -pbc whole, so that the protein is intact at frame 1. Then you can run 
trjconv -pbc nojump on the resulting trajectory. This usually requires a bit of 
trial and error.

Kind regards,
Erik

> On 31 Mar 2016, at 18:36, Irem Altan  wrote:
> 
> I think the problem is that I can’t seem to start from an unfragmented 
> structure. I start from the .pdb file, where the protein is a whole, and end 
> up with a .tpr file that is fragmented. The interesting thing is, this did 
> not happen with version 4.6.5 (I now use 5.1.2). Do I have to do something 
> extra while preparing the simulation system? 
> 
> Here is what I’m currently doing:
> 
> gmx pdb2gmx -f .pdb -o box.gro -p topol.top (then I choose 
> amber99sb and tip4pew)
> gmx solvate -cp box.gro -cs tip4p -p topol.top -o box_h2o.gro
> gmx grompp -f ions.mdp -c box_h2o.gro -o ions.tpr -p topol.top
> gmx genion -s ions.tpr -p topol.top -o ions.gro -neutral -conc 0.05  (I 
> choose to replace the solvation waters, SOL)
> gmx -f minim.mdp -p topol.top -c ions.gro -o em.tpr
> gmx mdrun -v -deffnm em
> gmx grompp -f nvt.mdp -p topol.top -c em.gro -o nvt_water_frozen.tpr
> 
> Then I run the simulation with mdrun. The .mdp files are almost identical to 
> Justin’s files from the Lysozyme tutorial. In the above steps, is there 
> something that seems like it could cause the fragmentation issue? 
> 
> Best,
> Irem
> 
>> On Mar 31, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:
>> 
>> No! You can't do that, because fitting will cause the PBC and the
>> coordinates to mismatch. So 'nojump' after that will for sure screw up the
>> coordinates. Check the trjconv workflow on the Gromacs site.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Tsjerk
>> On Mar 31, 2016 14:23, "Francesco Carbone"  wrote:
>> 
>>> You could try to fit first (-fit rot+trans) and fix pbc (-pbc nojump)
>>> later.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Fra
>>> 
>>> On 31 March 2016 at 05:45, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Irem,
 
 Check the structure in nvt_water_frozen.tpr:
 
 gmx editconf -f nvt_water_frozen.tpr -o ref.pdb
 
 Cheers,
 
 Tsjerk
 On Mar 31, 2016 00:04, "Irem Altan"  wrote:
 
> Hi,
> 
> I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb
>>> file
> as an input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of
>>> the
> simulation, I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the
 protein
> as follows:
> 
> gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc
> nojump -o prot.pdb
> 
> Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the
>>> coordinates
> wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What
> could be wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)
> 
> Best,
> Irem
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> 
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 
>>> --
>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>> 
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>>> posting!
>>> 
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>> 
>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>> 
>> * Please search the archive at 
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>> 
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> 
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
>> mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> 
> -- 
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
> mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.

Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-03-31 Thread Irem Altan
I think the problem is that I can’t seem to start from an unfragmented 
structure. I start from the .pdb file, where the protein is a whole, and end up 
with a .tpr file that is fragmented. The interesting thing is, this did not 
happen with version 4.6.5 (I now use 5.1.2). Do I have to do something extra 
while preparing the simulation system? 

Here is what I’m currently doing:

gmx pdb2gmx -f .pdb -o box.gro -p topol.top (then I choose 
amber99sb and tip4pew)
gmx solvate -cp box.gro -cs tip4p -p topol.top -o box_h2o.gro
gmx grompp -f ions.mdp -c box_h2o.gro -o ions.tpr -p topol.top
gmx genion -s ions.tpr -p topol.top -o ions.gro -neutral -conc 0.05  (I choose 
to replace the solvation waters, SOL)
gmx -f minim.mdp -p topol.top -c ions.gro -o em.tpr
gmx mdrun -v -deffnm em
gmx grompp -f nvt.mdp -p topol.top -c em.gro -o nvt_water_frozen.tpr

Then I run the simulation with mdrun. The .mdp files are almost identical to 
Justin’s files from the Lysozyme tutorial. In the above steps, is there 
something that seems like it could cause the fragmentation issue? 

Best,
Irem

> On Mar 31, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:
> 
> No! You can't do that, because fitting will cause the PBC and the
> coordinates to mismatch. So 'nojump' after that will for sure screw up the
> coordinates. Check the trjconv workflow on the Gromacs site.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tsjerk
> On Mar 31, 2016 14:23, "Francesco Carbone"  wrote:
> 
>> You could try to fit first (-fit rot+trans) and fix pbc (-pbc nojump)
>> later.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Fra
>> 
>> On 31 March 2016 at 05:45, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Irem,
>>> 
>>> Check the structure in nvt_water_frozen.tpr:
>>> 
>>> gmx editconf -f nvt_water_frozen.tpr -o ref.pdb
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Tsjerk
>>> On Mar 31, 2016 00:04, "Irem Altan"  wrote:
>>> 
 Hi,
 
 I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb
>> file
 as an input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of
>> the
 simulation, I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the
>>> protein
 as follows:
 
 gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc
 nojump -o prot.pdb
 
 Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the
>> coordinates
 wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What
 could be wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)
 
 Best,
 Irem
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list
 
 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!
 
 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
 
 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 
>>> --
>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>> 
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>>> posting!
>>> 
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>> 
>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>>> 
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>> 
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>> 
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> 
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>> 
> -- 
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
> mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-03-31 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
No! You can't do that, because fitting will cause the PBC and the
coordinates to mismatch. So 'nojump' after that will for sure screw up the
coordinates. Check the trjconv workflow on the Gromacs site.

Cheers,

Tsjerk
On Mar 31, 2016 14:23, "Francesco Carbone"  wrote:

> You could try to fit first (-fit rot+trans) and fix pbc (-pbc nojump)
> later.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fra
>
> On 31 March 2016 at 05:45, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:
>
> > Hi Irem,
> >
> > Check the structure in nvt_water_frozen.tpr:
> >
> > gmx editconf -f nvt_water_frozen.tpr -o ref.pdb
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tsjerk
> > On Mar 31, 2016 00:04, "Irem Altan"  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb
> file
> > > as an input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of
> the
> > > simulation, I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the
> > protein
> > > as follows:
> > >
> > > gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc
> > > nojump -o prot.pdb
> > >
> > > Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the
> coordinates
> > > wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What
> > > could be wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Irem
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> > >
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-03-31 Thread Irem Altan
Hi,

Thanks. If I do that, the reference structure would be what’s in the .tpr file, 
right?

Best,
Irem

> On Mar 31, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Francesco Carbone  wrote:
> 
> You could try to fit first (-fit rot+trans) and fix pbc (-pbc nojump) later.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Fra
> 
> On 31 March 2016 at 05:45, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Irem,
>> 
>> Check the structure in nvt_water_frozen.tpr:
>> 
>> gmx editconf -f nvt_water_frozen.tpr -o ref.pdb
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Tsjerk
>> On Mar 31, 2016 00:04, "Irem Altan"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb file
>>> as an input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of the
>>> simulation, I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the
>> protein
>>> as follows:
>>> 
>>> gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc
>>> nojump -o prot.pdb
>>> 
>>> Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the coordinates
>>> wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What
>>> could be wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Irem
>>> --
>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>> 
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>>> posting!
>>> 
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>> 
>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>>> 
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>> 
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>> 
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> 
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>> 
> -- 
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
> mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-03-31 Thread Irem Altan
Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion. Unsurprisingly, the structure in 
nvt_water_frozen.tpr is also fragmented. Is there a way to use the input .pdb 
file as reference, somehow?

Best,
Irem

> On Mar 31, 2016, at 12:45 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:
> 
> Hi Irem,
> 
> Check the structure in nvt_water_frozen.tpr:
> 
> gmx editconf -f nvt_water_frozen.tpr -o ref.pdb
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tsjerk
> On Mar 31, 2016 00:04, "Irem Altan"  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb file
>> as an input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of the
>> simulation, I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the protein
>> as follows:
>> 
>> gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc
>> nojump -o prot.pdb
>> 
>> Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the coordinates
>> wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What
>> could be wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)
>> 
>> Best,
>> Irem
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>> 
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>> 
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> 
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>> 
> -- 
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> 
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> 
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
> mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-03-31 Thread Francesco Carbone
You could try to fit first (-fit rot+trans) and fix pbc (-pbc nojump) later.

Cheers,

Fra

On 31 March 2016 at 05:45, Tsjerk Wassenaar  wrote:

> Hi Irem,
>
> Check the structure in nvt_water_frozen.tpr:
>
> gmx editconf -f nvt_water_frozen.tpr -o ref.pdb
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tsjerk
> On Mar 31, 2016 00:04, "Irem Altan"  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb file
> > as an input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of the
> > simulation, I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the
> protein
> > as follows:
> >
> > gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc
> > nojump -o prot.pdb
> >
> > Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the coordinates
> > wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What
> > could be wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)
> >
> > Best,
> > Irem
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-03-30 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Irem,

Check the structure in nvt_water_frozen.tpr:

gmx editconf -f nvt_water_frozen.tpr -o ref.pdb

Cheers,

Tsjerk
On Mar 31, 2016 00:04, "Irem Altan"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb file
> as an input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of the
> simulation, I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the protein
> as follows:
>
> gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc
> nojump -o prot.pdb
>
> Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the coordinates
> wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What
> could be wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)
>
> Best,
> Irem
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] -pbc nojump failure

2016-03-30 Thread Irem Altan
Hi,

I am simulating a protein in its unit cell. I use the original .pdb file as an 
input, so the initial molecule is not fragmented. At the end of the simulation, 
I generate a .pdb file containing the trajectory of the protein as follows:

gmx trjconv -f nvt_water_frozen.trr -s nvt_water_frozen.tpr -dt 20 -pbc nojump 
-o prot.pdb

Despite the fact that I use -pbc nojump, I still get all the coordinates 
wrapped into the unit cell, and therefore the protein fragmented. What could be 
wrong? (I use GROMACS 5.1.2)

Best,
Irem
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.