Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation

2016-12-04 Thread Mijiddorj Batsaikhan
Dear Justin,

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Mijiddorj


>
> --
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:04:16 -0500
> From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
> To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation
> Message-ID: <b811b475-566c-34f8-c16a-8aa43f7a9...@vt.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
>
>
> On 12/2/16 10:29 PM, Mijiddorj Batsaikhan wrote:
> > Dear Justin,
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > I attached my mdp file. Peptide locates on membrane surface. I want to
> know
> > about interaction between membrane and peptide, membrane permeability of
> > peptide, amino acids contribution for the penetration, specially
> energetic
> > values between the membrane and the peptide.
> > Please suggest me with helpful options?
> > How can I chose COM groups?
> >
>
> This topic was recently discussed at great length on the list, and I
> believe the
> conclusion was that there was no really solid answer.  In biphasic
> systems, in
> which the two phases have different diffusion properties, typically the two
> phases are the two groups.  For a protein bound to a membrane, the protein
> is
> part of both environments.  I don't think it should be its own separate
> group,
> but there is no systematic study of simulation properties in this regard
> that I
> know of.
>
> -Justin
>
> > I also copied my mdp file.
> >
> > 
> > integrator  = md
> > dt  = 0.002
> > nsteps  = 2500
> > nstlog  = 5000
> > nstxout = 5000
> > nstvout = 5000
> > nstfout = 5000
> > nstcalcenergy   = 100
> > nstenergy   = 100
> > nstxout-compressed  = 100
> > nstxtcout   = 100
> > compressed-x-grps   = System
> > energygrps  = PROT MEMB SOL
> > ;
> > cutoff-scheme   = Verlet
> > nstlist = 10
> > rlist   = 1.2
> > coulombtype = pme
> > rcoulomb= 1.2
> > vdwtype = Cut-off
> > vdw-modifier= Force-switch
> > rvdw_switch = 1.0
> > rvdw= 1.2
> > ;
> > tcoupl  = Nose-Hoover
> > tc_grps = PROT   MEMB   SOL_ION
> > tau_t   = 1.01.01.0
> > ref_t   = 313 313 313
> > ;
> > pcoupl  = Parrinello-Rahman
> > pcoupltype  = semiisotropic
> > tau_p   = 5.0
> > compressibility = 4.5e-5  4.5e-5
> > ref_p   = 1.0 1.0
> > ;
> > constraints = h-bonds
> > constraint_algorithm= LINCS
> > continuation= yes
> > ;
> > nstcomm = 100
> > comm_mode   = linear
> > comm_grps           = PROT   MEMB   SOL_ION ; which one is better to
> > the simulation?
> > ;comm_grps   = PROT_MEMB   SOL_ION ; which one is better to
> the
> > simulation?
> > ;
> > refcoord_scaling= com
> > 
> > --
> >
> >>
> >> Message: 5
> >> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:50:52 -0500
> >> From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
> >> To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> >> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation
> >> Message-ID: <cc3fc878-feef-4424-dacd-3824d67a6...@vt.edu>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/1/16 9:17 PM, Mijiddorj Batsaikhan wrote:
> >>> Dear gmx_users,
> >>>
> >>> I started simulation that a peptide on membrane. My peptide locates on
> >> the
> >>> membrane surface. I have two questions relating to the simulation.
> >>> (1)
> >>> When I start the simulation, I chose COM groups separately. Is this
> >> choice
> >>> okay? or May I need to chose COM group inseparately?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Your description is ambiguous; please post the actual .mdp contents.
> >>
> >>> (2)
> >>> During the simulation peptide is moving the edge of membrane. How can I
> >>> shift the peptide to the central section of the membrane? Can I use
> >>> -nojump, -center options of trjconv 

Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation

2016-12-04 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 12/2/16 10:29 PM, Mijiddorj Batsaikhan wrote:

Dear Justin,

Thank you very much.
I attached my mdp file. Peptide locates on membrane surface. I want to know
about interaction between membrane and peptide, membrane permeability of
peptide, amino acids contribution for the penetration, specially energetic
values between the membrane and the peptide.
Please suggest me with helpful options?
How can I chose COM groups?



This topic was recently discussed at great length on the list, and I believe the 
conclusion was that there was no really solid answer.  In biphasic systems, in 
which the two phases have different diffusion properties, typically the two 
phases are the two groups.  For a protein bound to a membrane, the protein is 
part of both environments.  I don't think it should be its own separate group, 
but there is no systematic study of simulation properties in this regard that I 
know of.


-Justin


I also copied my mdp file.


integrator  = md
dt  = 0.002
nsteps  = 2500
nstlog  = 5000
nstxout = 5000
nstvout = 5000
nstfout = 5000
nstcalcenergy   = 100
nstenergy   = 100
nstxout-compressed  = 100
nstxtcout   = 100
compressed-x-grps   = System
energygrps  = PROT MEMB SOL
;
cutoff-scheme   = Verlet
nstlist = 10
rlist   = 1.2
coulombtype = pme
rcoulomb= 1.2
vdwtype = Cut-off
vdw-modifier= Force-switch
rvdw_switch = 1.0
rvdw= 1.2
;
tcoupl  = Nose-Hoover
tc_grps = PROT   MEMB   SOL_ION
tau_t   = 1.01.01.0
ref_t   = 313 313 313
;
pcoupl  = Parrinello-Rahman
pcoupltype  = semiisotropic
tau_p   = 5.0
compressibility = 4.5e-5  4.5e-5
ref_p   = 1.0 1.0
;
constraints = h-bonds
constraint_algorithm= LINCS
continuation= yes
;
nstcomm = 100
comm_mode   = linear
comm_grps   = PROT   MEMB   SOL_ION ; which one is better to
the simulation?
;comm_grps   = PROT_MEMB   SOL_ION ; which one is better to the
simulation?
;
refcoord_scaling= com

--



Message: 5
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:50:52 -0500
From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation
Message-ID: <cc3fc878-feef-4424-dacd-3824d67a6...@vt.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed



On 12/1/16 9:17 PM, Mijiddorj Batsaikhan wrote:

Dear gmx_users,

I started simulation that a peptide on membrane. My peptide locates on

the

membrane surface. I have two questions relating to the simulation.
(1)
When I start the simulation, I chose COM groups separately. Is this

choice

okay? or May I need to chose COM group inseparately?



Your description is ambiguous; please post the actual .mdp contents.


(2)
During the simulation peptide is moving the edge of membrane. How can I
shift the peptide to the central section of the membrane? Can I use
-nojump, -center options of trjconv tool?



Yes - try it and see.  Also relevant is -fit transxy.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==






--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation

2016-12-02 Thread Mijiddorj Batsaikhan
Dear Justin,

Thank you very much.
I attached my mdp file. Peptide locates on membrane surface. I want to know
about interaction between membrane and peptide, membrane permeability of
peptide, amino acids contribution for the penetration, specially energetic
values between the membrane and the peptide.
Please suggest me with helpful options?
How can I chose COM groups?

I also copied my mdp file.


integrator  = md
dt  = 0.002
nsteps  = 2500
nstlog  = 5000
nstxout = 5000
nstvout = 5000
nstfout = 5000
nstcalcenergy   = 100
nstenergy   = 100
nstxout-compressed  = 100
nstxtcout   = 100
compressed-x-grps   = System
energygrps  = PROT MEMB SOL
;
cutoff-scheme   = Verlet
nstlist = 10
rlist   = 1.2
coulombtype = pme
rcoulomb= 1.2
vdwtype = Cut-off
vdw-modifier= Force-switch
rvdw_switch = 1.0
rvdw= 1.2
;
tcoupl  = Nose-Hoover
tc_grps = PROT   MEMB   SOL_ION
tau_t   = 1.01.01.0
ref_t   = 313 313 313
;
pcoupl  = Parrinello-Rahman
pcoupltype  = semiisotropic
tau_p   = 5.0
compressibility = 4.5e-5  4.5e-5
ref_p   = 1.0 1.0
;
constraints = h-bonds
constraint_algorithm= LINCS
continuation= yes
;
nstcomm = 100
comm_mode   = linear
comm_grps   = PROT   MEMB   SOL_ION ; which one is better to
the simulation?
;comm_grps   = PROT_MEMB   SOL_ION ; which one is better to the
simulation?
;
refcoord_scaling= com

--

>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:50:52 -0500
> From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
> To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation
> Message-ID: <cc3fc878-feef-4424-dacd-3824d67a6...@vt.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
>
>
> On 12/1/16 9:17 PM, Mijiddorj Batsaikhan wrote:
> > Dear gmx_users,
> >
> > I started simulation that a peptide on membrane. My peptide locates on
> the
> > membrane surface. I have two questions relating to the simulation.
> > (1)
> > When I start the simulation, I chose COM groups separately. Is this
> choice
> > okay? or May I need to chose COM group inseparately?
> >
>
> Your description is ambiguous; please post the actual .mdp contents.
>
> > (2)
> > During the simulation peptide is moving the edge of membrane. How can I
> > shift the peptide to the central section of the membrane? Can I use
> > -nojump, -center options of trjconv tool?
> >
>
> Yes - try it and see.  Also relevant is -fit transxy.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
> http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==
>
>
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation

2016-12-02 Thread Mijiddorj Batsaikhan
Dear Justin,

Thank you very much.
I attached my mdp file. Peptide locates on membrane surface. I want to know
about interaction between membrane and peptide, membrane permeability of
peptide, amino acids contribution for the penetration, specially energetic
values between the membrane and the peptide.
Please suggest me with helpful options?
How can I chose COM groups?


--

>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:50:52 -0500
> From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
> To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation
> Message-ID: <cc3fc878-feef-4424-dacd-3824d67a6...@vt.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
>
>
> On 12/1/16 9:17 PM, Mijiddorj Batsaikhan wrote:
> > Dear gmx_users,
> >
> > I started simulation that a peptide on membrane. My peptide locates on
> the
> > membrane surface. I have two questions relating to the simulation.
> > (1)
> > When I start the simulation, I chose COM groups separately. Is this
> choice
> > okay? or May I need to chose COM group inseparately?
> >
>
> Your description is ambiguous; please post the actual .mdp contents.
>
> > (2)
> > During the simulation peptide is moving the edge of membrane. How can I
> > shift the peptide to the central section of the membrane? Can I use
> > -nojump, -center options of trjconv tool?
> >
>
> Yes - try it and see.  Also relevant is -fit transxy.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
> http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==
>
>
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Re: [gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation

2016-12-02 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 12/1/16 9:17 PM, Mijiddorj Batsaikhan wrote:

Dear gmx_users,

I started simulation that a peptide on membrane. My peptide locates on the
membrane surface. I have two questions relating to the simulation.
(1)
When I start the simulation, I chose COM groups separately. Is this choice
okay? or May I need to chose COM group inseparately?



Your description is ambiguous; please post the actual .mdp contents.


(2)
During the simulation peptide is moving the edge of membrane. How can I
shift the peptide to the central section of the membrane? Can I use
-nojump, -center options of trjconv tool?



Yes - try it and see.  Also relevant is -fit transxy.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] COM group of Membrane and Protein simulation

2016-12-01 Thread Mijiddorj Batsaikhan
Dear gmx_users,

I started simulation that a peptide on membrane. My peptide locates on the
membrane surface. I have two questions relating to the simulation.
(1)
When I start the simulation, I chose COM groups separately. Is this choice
okay? or May I need to chose COM group inseparately?

(2)
During the simulation peptide is moving the edge of membrane. How can I
shift the peptide to the central section of the membrane? Can I use
-nojump, -center options of trjconv tool?


Best regards,

Mijiddorj
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.