With reference to my earlier message, I have also tried the g_trjorder
command giving reference group as Backbone.
When I give the command,
g_trjorder -f 100ns_nc_72um2.xtc -s md.tpr -nshell nshell_urea.xvg -r 0.45
-da 0
I am getting reasonable no.of urea molecules like 6,8,9,etc. Same goes for
water moelcules.
But when I add -com option, all of the numebrs decrease to 0 or 1.
So is it wrong to add -com option? Considering we're already specifying -da
as 0?
Yours sincerely,
Apramita Chand
From: Apramita Chand <apramita.ch...@gmail.com>
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Doubts regarding g_select
Message-ID:
<ca+gtzozrewmzjhkh4tmpwha12wqr5ob0y_bu_w8fh16oqd3...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Dear All,
I am confused between different commands and their outputs for g_select. I
want to choose a cutoff of 0.45nm and want to calculate the no. of urea
molecules within 0.45 as well as beyond 0.45nm of the peptide backbone.
I have a total of 18 urea molecules in my system
One of the commands:
g_select -select ' resname UREA and within 0.45 of group Backbone' -f
100nc_entire.xtc -s md.tpr -os size_within0.45_urea_backbone.xvg -oi
index_within0.45_urea_backbone.dat -oc cfrac_urea_within0.45_backbone.xvg
-seltype mol_com
gives 6,5,4,3...etc urea molecules in the size.xvg file which seems to be
correct
But if I give the same command by changing it to
g_select -select 'rdist=res_com distance from com of group Backbone;
resname UREA and rdist<=0.45'
I get 0 or 1 urea molecule for every time frame.
Again, I want to generate no.of urea molecules beyond 0.45,
Giving,
g_select -select 'rdist=res_com distance from com of group Backbone;
resname UREA and rdist<=0.45'
I get all 18 urea molecules in the above 0.45 regime
That is confusing!
I think the first command that specified within 0.45 nm is correct for my
system and I would like a similar command that can specify beyond 0.45nm.
This problem persists even when I increase urea molecules to 40 or 80.
THere's just 1 molecule below 0.45nm and all of the others above 0.45nm.
But the hydrogen bond numbers show increasing no. of hydrogen bonds between
peptide-urea (increases upto 6-9) . What could be going wrong?
Any suggestions regarding this problem?
Yours sincerely,
Apramita
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
