Re: [gmx-users] G-mmpbsa

2017-12-01 Thread Nikhil Maroli
Provide the information in summary files. What about non-bonded interaction
energy from gromacs?
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] G-mmpbsa

2017-11-30 Thread farial tavakoli
 blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px 
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white 
!important; }  Dear gmx users
I used g_mmpbsa to calculate the binding energy of my complex. But the results 
was positive .Is there anyone can help me how come the calculated total binding 
energy was positive? I searched google, and found it might be because of the 
polar dielectric constant. I increased pdie from 2 as default value to 4. But 
got the same results. ( total energy was pisitive) . I know g_mmpbsa doesnt 
relate to here but  I would really be appreciated it if someone can help me
Thanks in advanceFarial


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
 
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.