[gmx-users] g_covar warnings

2014-03-27 Thread João Henriques
Hello everyone,

The documentation reads:


All structures are fitted to the structure in the structure file. When this
is not a run input file periodicity will not be taken into account.


This is rather cryptic, what does it mean in practice? No tpr, no party?
What if I use a properly centered and whole .gro file?

When ran with a .gro as the structure input file, I get two warnings. One
is related to the masses, which are non-existent in the .gro, but I don't
need them anyway. The second warning is honestly confusing me even more.


WARNING: If there are molecules in the input trajectory file
 that are broken across periodic boundaries, they
 cannot be made whole (or treated as whole) without
 you providing a run input file.


The documentation points out to the structure input file and now it's the
trajectory? What's going on? Do I also need to make each frame whole in the
input .xtc? Can someone elaborate on this?

Thank you in advance,
Best regards,
João Henriques
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] g_covar warnings

2014-03-27 Thread João Henriques
Thanks Justin. That corroborates my no .tpr, no party suspicion. However,
would it be possible to achieve a correct analysis if I were to use a whole
.gro with a properly pre-processed .xtc (-ur -pbc)? Maybe I didn't explain
myself properly, but that's what I want to know.

/J


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 3/27/14, 1:27 PM, João Henriques wrote:

 Hello everyone,

 The documentation reads:

 
 All structures are fitted to the structure in the structure file. When
 this
 is not a run input file periodicity will not be taken into account.
 

 This is rather cryptic, what does it mean in practice? No tpr, no party?
 What if I use a properly centered and whole .gro file?

 When ran with a .gro as the structure input file, I get two warnings. One
 is related to the masses, which are non-existent in the .gro, but I don't
 need them anyway. The second warning is honestly confusing me even more.

 
 WARNING: If there are molecules in the input trajectory file
   that are broken across periodic boundaries, they
   cannot be made whole (or treated as whole) without
   you providing a run input file.
 

 The documentation points out to the structure input file and now it's the
 trajectory? What's going on? Do I also need to make each frame whole in
 the
 input .xtc? Can someone elaborate on this?


 The documentation consistently refers to the run input file.  A .tpr has
 record of how periodicity is treated.  Nothing else does.  If you don't
 tell g_covar (like most Gromacs tools) how periodicity is treated, you can
 get garbage as a result.  The trajectory may have broken molecules,
 because mdrun doesn't care how they look - it has a run input file and thus
 knowledge of periodicity.  When running analysis like g_covar, if the
 bonded connectivity of the molecule and the periodicity are unknown (again,
 if you're not using a .tpr), then absolute displacements of coordinates are
 used, thus your analysis might be totally hosed if the molecule splits -
 that would be a rather dramatic structure change detected by g_covar.  In
 fact, so dramatic that it's false.

 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
 Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] g_covar warnings

2014-03-27 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 3/27/14, 1:54 PM, João Henriques wrote:

Thanks Justin. That corroborates my no .tpr, no party suspicion. However,
would it be possible to achieve a correct analysis if I were to use a whole
.gro with a properly pre-processed .xtc (-ur -pbc)? Maybe I didn't explain
myself properly, but that's what I want to know.



Yes, if you have removed jumps and have intact structures throughout the 
trajectory, you're fine.  The warning is only there for users who haven't 
thought ahead.


-Justin


/J


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:




On 3/27/14, 1:27 PM, João Henriques wrote:


Hello everyone,

The documentation reads:


All structures are fitted to the structure in the structure file. When
this
is not a run input file periodicity will not be taken into account.


This is rather cryptic, what does it mean in practice? No tpr, no party?
What if I use a properly centered and whole .gro file?

When ran with a .gro as the structure input file, I get two warnings. One
is related to the masses, which are non-existent in the .gro, but I don't
need them anyway. The second warning is honestly confusing me even more.


WARNING: If there are molecules in the input trajectory file
   that are broken across periodic boundaries, they
   cannot be made whole (or treated as whole) without
   you providing a run input file.


The documentation points out to the structure input file and now it's the
trajectory? What's going on? Do I also need to make each frame whole in
the
input .xtc? Can someone elaborate on this?



The documentation consistently refers to the run input file.  A .tpr has
record of how periodicity is treated.  Nothing else does.  If you don't
tell g_covar (like most Gromacs tools) how periodicity is treated, you can
get garbage as a result.  The trajectory may have broken molecules,
because mdrun doesn't care how they look - it has a run input file and thus
knowledge of periodicity.  When running analysis like g_covar, if the
bonded connectivity of the molecule and the periodicity are unknown (again,
if you're not using a .tpr), then absolute displacements of coordinates are
used, thus your analysis might be totally hosed if the molecule splits -
that would be a rather dramatic structure change detected by g_covar.  In
fact, so dramatic that it's false.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] g_covar warnings

2014-03-27 Thread João Henriques
Great, that's what I needed to know. Still, I totally agree with you. There
are certain best practices, and using a .tpr is always the best choice.

Thanks,
João


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 3/27/14, 1:54 PM, João Henriques wrote:

 Thanks Justin. That corroborates my no .tpr, no party suspicion.
 However,
 would it be possible to achieve a correct analysis if I were to use a
 whole
 .gro with a properly pre-processed .xtc (-ur -pbc)? Maybe I didn't explain
 myself properly, but that's what I want to know.


 Yes, if you have removed jumps and have intact structures throughout the
 trajectory, you're fine.  The warning is only there for users who haven't
 thought ahead.

 -Justin


  /J


 On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 3/27/14, 1:27 PM, João Henriques wrote:

  Hello everyone,

 The documentation reads:

 
 All structures are fitted to the structure in the structure file. When
 this
 is not a run input file periodicity will not be taken into account.
 

 This is rather cryptic, what does it mean in practice? No tpr, no party?
 What if I use a properly centered and whole .gro file?

 When ran with a .gro as the structure input file, I get two warnings.
 One
 is related to the masses, which are non-existent in the .gro, but I
 don't
 need them anyway. The second warning is honestly confusing me even more.

 
 WARNING: If there are molecules in the input trajectory file
that are broken across periodic boundaries, they
cannot be made whole (or treated as whole) without
you providing a run input file.
 

 The documentation points out to the structure input file and now it's
 the
 trajectory? What's going on? Do I also need to make each frame whole in
 the
 input .xtc? Can someone elaborate on this?


  The documentation consistently refers to the run input file.  A .tpr
 has
 record of how periodicity is treated.  Nothing else does.  If you don't
 tell g_covar (like most Gromacs tools) how periodicity is treated, you
 can
 get garbage as a result.  The trajectory may have broken molecules,
 because mdrun doesn't care how they look - it has a run input file and
 thus
 knowledge of periodicity.  When running analysis like g_covar, if the
 bonded connectivity of the molecule and the periodicity are unknown
 (again,
 if you're not using a .tpr), then absolute displacements of coordinates
 are
 used, thus your analysis might be totally hosed if the molecule splits
 -
 that would be a rather dramatic structure change detected by g_covar.  In
 fact, so dramatic that it's false.

 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
 Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
 Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.