[gmx-users] g_energy reporting 0.0000 interaction energy between energy groups in GPU run?

2014-09-09 Thread Leandro Bortot
Dear users,

 I did some simulations of organic molecules in solution to study how
they interact, but I'm facing some problems and your help would be greatly
appreciated.
 Consider the following case: I simulated two copies of molecule AcO
starting from a structure in which they are non-covalently interacting. I'm
using the AMBER99 forcefield with GAFF. I've confirmed by visual inspection
that the molecules are interacting with each other, i.e. they didn't
separate during the simulation. Additionally, I've specified the energy
groups aco_1, aco_2, SOL, Ion in the original MD tpr. The problem
is that g_energy reports all aco_1-aco_2 energy terms as exactly
0.00. The energy terms are OK.

 This was only an example. I actually simulated 2, 3 and 4 copies of
interacting molecules in different ways and this happens in all cases.

 These results were obtained using GPUs. I used the same .tpr to rerun
the .xtc on CPUs only and now the aco_1-aco_2 energy terms are OK. In
both cases I used GROMACS 4.6.6.

 I've searched the list but found nothing. Is this a problem/bug? Am I
doing something wrong with the GPUs?


Thank you in advance,
Leandro
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] g_energy reporting 0.0000 interaction energy between energy groups in GPU run?

2014-09-09 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 9/9/14 9:09 PM, Leandro Bortot wrote:

Dear users,

  I did some simulations of organic molecules in solution to study how
they interact, but I'm facing some problems and your help would be greatly
appreciated.
  Consider the following case: I simulated two copies of molecule AcO
starting from a structure in which they are non-covalently interacting. I'm
using the AMBER99 forcefield with GAFF. I've confirmed by visual inspection
that the molecules are interacting with each other, i.e. they didn't
separate during the simulation. Additionally, I've specified the energy
groups aco_1, aco_2, SOL, Ion in the original MD tpr. The problem
is that g_energy reports all aco_1-aco_2 energy terms as exactly
0.00. The energy terms are OK.

  This was only an example. I actually simulated 2, 3 and 4 copies of
interacting molecules in different ways and this happens in all cases.

  These results were obtained using GPUs. I used the same .tpr to rerun
the .xtc on CPUs only and now the aco_1-aco_2 energy terms are OK. In
both cases I used GROMACS 4.6.6.

  I've searched the list but found nothing. Is this a problem/bug? Am I
doing something wrong with the GPUs?



Multiple energygrps are not supported on GPU.  This should be disabled in 5.0.1, 
and if not, hopefully the next release, as it is a known issue.


-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] g_energy reporting 0.0000 interaction energy between energy groups in GPU run?

2014-09-09 Thread Leandro Bortot
Thank you for your quick answer, Justin.

I'll make new .edr files using only CPUs.

Best regards,
Leandro

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:



 On 9/9/14 9:09 PM, Leandro Bortot wrote:

 Dear users,

   I did some simulations of organic molecules in solution to study how
 they interact, but I'm facing some problems and your help would be greatly
 appreciated.
   Consider the following case: I simulated two copies of molecule
 AcO
 starting from a structure in which they are non-covalently interacting.
 I'm
 using the AMBER99 forcefield with GAFF. I've confirmed by visual
 inspection
 that the molecules are interacting with each other, i.e. they didn't
 separate during the simulation. Additionally, I've specified the energy
 groups aco_1, aco_2, SOL, Ion in the original MD tpr. The problem
 is that g_energy reports all aco_1-aco_2 energy terms as exactly
 0.00. The energy terms are OK.

   This was only an example. I actually simulated 2, 3 and 4 copies of
 interacting molecules in different ways and this happens in all cases.

   These results were obtained using GPUs. I used the same .tpr to
 rerun
 the .xtc on CPUs only and now the aco_1-aco_2 energy terms are OK. In
 both cases I used GROMACS 4.6.6.

   I've searched the list but found nothing. Is this a problem/bug? Am
 I
 doing something wrong with the GPUs?


 Multiple energygrps are not supported on GPU.  This should be disabled in
 5.0.1, and if not, hopefully the next release, as it is a known issue.

 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
 Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
 send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.