Re: [gmx-users] gmx check precision

2018-03-30 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 3/30/18 7:29 AM, jt555 wrote:

Hello there,

I am currently using GROMACS version 5.1.2 and had a question in relation to 
the gmx check command. The following appears on the screen after invocation of 
gmx check -f protein.pdb:

GROMACS:  gmx check, VERSION 5.1.2
Executable:   /usr/bin/gmx
Data prefix:  /usr
Command line:
   gmx check -f protein.pdb

Checking file protein.pdb
Reading frame   0 time0.000
# Atoms  9190
Precision 0.0001 (nm)
'GROtesk MACabre and Sinister t=  40.0', 9190 atoms
Reading frame6000 time 24.000

Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step  625040
Time  625040
Lambda   0
Coords625040
Velocities   0
Forces   0
Box  0

The precision = 0.001 nm, all my attempts at locating the answer for my 
questions proved futile.
Question) Invocation of similar command for XTC file (i.e., gmx check -f 
protein.xtc) also results in precision of 0.001 nm. However, in the manual it 
clearly states that .xtc exhibits greater precision in comparison to .pdb. If


Where does it say that?


that is the case, then why am I observing the same value for precision in both? 
Or is it the case that because the


The default precision for an .xtc file is exactly what you're seeing, 
unless you're changing it in the .mdp file to save more decimal places.



system under investigation only contains 9,190 atoms, therefore the difference 
in precision between .xtc and .pdb is almost negligible and only realised when 
a much larger system is under investigation? FInally, could you kindly


The precision of output files is not related to the size of the systems.


summarise the significance of precision obtained from gmx check command for a 
beginner?


It's just reporting how many decimal places are saved.

-Justin


I thank you in advance for your kind assistance.

Yours faithfully,

J.

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.


--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry

303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061

jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.thelemkullab.com

==

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


[gmx-users] gmx check precision

2018-03-30 Thread jt555
Hello there,

I am currently using GROMACS version 5.1.2 and had a question in relation to 
the gmx check command. The following appears on the screen after invocation of 
gmx check -f protein.pdb:

GROMACS:  gmx check, VERSION 5.1.2
Executable:   /usr/bin/gmx
Data prefix:  /usr
Command line:
  gmx check -f protein.pdb

Checking file protein.pdb
Reading frame   0 time0.000
# Atoms  9190
Precision 0.0001 (nm)
'GROtesk MACabre and Sinister t=  40.0', 9190 atoms
Reading frame6000 time 24.000

Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step  625040
Time  625040
Lambda   0
Coords625040
Velocities   0
Forces   0
Box  0

The precision = 0.001 nm, all my attempts at locating the answer for my 
questions proved futile.
Question) Invocation of similar command for XTC file (i.e., gmx check -f 
protein.xtc) also results in precision of 0.001 nm. However, in the manual it 
clearly states that .xtc exhibits greater precision in comparison to .pdb. If 
that is the case, then why am I observing the same value for precision in both? 
Or is it the case that because the system under investigation only contains 
9,190 atoms, therefore the difference in precision between .xtc and .pdb is 
almost negligible and only realised when a much larger system is under 
investigation? FInally, could you kindly summarise the significance of 
precision obtained from gmx check command for a beginner?

I thank you in advance for your kind assistance.

Yours faithfully,

J.

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.