Re: [gmx-users] rlist for implicit water

2014-06-03 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 6/3/14, 4:15 AM, Urszula Uciechowska wrote:

Dear Gromacs users,

I would like to run simulations with implicit water. My protein system is
quite big it contains 784AA. I prepared eM.mdp file (see below) however I
am not sure if its ok especially the rlist what should I use there in case
of such big system.

define  = -DFLEXIBLE
constraints = none
integrator  = steep ; steepest descents energy
minimization
dt  = 0.001 ; ps
nsteps  = 3000  ; maximum number of steps to
integrate
implicit_solvent= GBSA
gb_algorithm= Still
nstgbradii  = 1
gb_epsilon_solvent  = 80
gb_saltconc = 0
sa_algorithm= Ace-approximation
sa_surface_tension  = -1
pbc = no
rgbradii= 0
ns_type = simple; method of updating neighbor list
nstlist = 0
rlist   = 0 ; this means all-vs-all (no cut-off)
coulombtype = cut-off
rcoulomb= 0 ; [nm] distance for Coulomb cut-off
vdwtype = cut-off   ; twin-range cut-off with rlist
where rvdw = rlist
rvdw= 0 ; [nm] distance for LJ cut-off
nstenergy   = 100
emtol   = 5.0
emstep  = 0.01
comm-grps   = Protein
optimize_fft= yes

Thank you in advance for any comments and suggestions.



If you're using infinite cutoffs, the only acceptable value for rlist is 0.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] rlist for implicit water

2014-06-03 Thread Urszula Uciechowska
Dear Justin,

How could I change the cut-offs  to make the MD more faster in my case?

/Urszula


 On 6/3/14, 4:15 AM, Urszula Uciechowska wrote:
 Dear Gromacs users,

 I would like to run simulations with implicit water. My protein system
 is
 quite big it contains 784AA. I prepared eM.mdp file (see below) however
 I
 am not sure if its ok especially the rlist what should I use there in
 case
 of such big system.

 define  = -DFLEXIBLE
 constraints = none
 integrator  = steep ; steepest descents energy
 minimization
 dt  = 0.001 ; ps
 nsteps  = 3000  ; maximum number of steps to
 integrate
 implicit_solvent= GBSA
 gb_algorithm= Still
 nstgbradii  = 1
 gb_epsilon_solvent  = 80
 gb_saltconc = 0
 sa_algorithm= Ace-approximation
 sa_surface_tension  = -1
 pbc = no
 rgbradii= 0
 ns_type = simple; method of updating neighbor
 list
 nstlist = 0
 rlist   = 0 ; this means all-vs-all (no
 cut-off)
 coulombtype = cut-off
 rcoulomb= 0 ; [nm] distance for Coulomb
 cut-off
 vdwtype = cut-off   ; twin-range cut-off with rlist
 where rvdw = rlist
 rvdw= 0 ; [nm] distance for LJ cut-off
 nstenergy   = 100
 emtol   = 5.0
 emstep  = 0.01
 comm-grps   = Protein
 optimize_fft= yes

 Thank you in advance for any comments and suggestions.


 If you're using infinite cutoffs, the only acceptable value for rlist is
 0.

 -Justin

 --
 ==

 Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
 Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
 School of Pharmacy
 Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
 University of Maryland, Baltimore
 20 Penn St.
 Baltimore, MD 21201

 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

 ==
 --
 Gromacs Users mailing list

 * Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
 posting!

 * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

 * For (un)subscribe requests visit
 https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send
 a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.





-
Ta wiadomość została wysłana z serwera Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
http://www.ug.edu.pl/

-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


Re: [gmx-users] rlist for implicit water

2014-06-03 Thread Justin Lemkul



On 6/3/14, 12:21 PM, Urszula Uciechowska wrote:

Dear Justin,

How could I change the cut-offs  to make the MD more faster in my case?



Well, there are plenty of things one can do to improve performance, but the 
better question is whether or not one can maintain something physically sensible 
at the same time :)  For implicit solvent, at least in my own experience, the 
only way I get stable trajectories is with the infinite cutoff approach.  Some 
advocate a long cutoff scheme with all cutoffs set to something like 2.0 or 
4.0 nm, but that's never worked for me, either.


You also should never judge performance from EM alone.

-Justin


/Urszula



On 6/3/14, 4:15 AM, Urszula Uciechowska wrote:

Dear Gromacs users,

I would like to run simulations with implicit water. My protein system
is
quite big it contains 784AA. I prepared eM.mdp file (see below) however
I
am not sure if its ok especially the rlist what should I use there in
case
of such big system.

define  = -DFLEXIBLE
constraints = none
integrator  = steep ; steepest descents energy
minimization
dt  = 0.001 ; ps
nsteps  = 3000  ; maximum number of steps to
integrate
implicit_solvent= GBSA
gb_algorithm= Still
nstgbradii  = 1
gb_epsilon_solvent  = 80
gb_saltconc = 0
sa_algorithm= Ace-approximation
sa_surface_tension  = -1
pbc = no
rgbradii= 0
ns_type = simple; method of updating neighbor
list
nstlist = 0
rlist   = 0 ; this means all-vs-all (no
cut-off)
coulombtype = cut-off
rcoulomb= 0 ; [nm] distance for Coulomb
cut-off
vdwtype = cut-off   ; twin-range cut-off with rlist
where rvdw = rlist
rvdw= 0 ; [nm] distance for LJ cut-off
nstenergy   = 100
emtol   = 5.0
emstep  = 0.01
comm-grps   = Protein
optimize_fft= yes

Thank you in advance for any comments and suggestions.



If you're using infinite cutoffs, the only acceptable value for rlist is
0.

-Justin

--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send
a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.






-
Ta wiadomość została wysłana z serwera Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
http://www.ug.edu.pl/



--
==

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.