[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1841700] Re: instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

2020-03-23 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package neutron - 2:10.0.7-0ubuntu1~cloud3
---

 neutron (2:10.0.7-0ubuntu1~cloud3) xenial-ocata; urgency=medium
 .
   * Revert backport of ingress bandwidth limits fix (LP: #1841700). The
 following patches are dropped.
 - d/p/0001-Change-duplicate-OVS-bridge-datapath-ids.patch
 - d/p/0002-Add-QoS-bandwidth-limit-for-instance-ingress-traffic.patch
 - d/p/0003-Add-support-for-ingress-bandwidth-limit-rules-in-ovs.patch
 - d/p/0004-Ingress-bandwidth-limit-rule-in-Linuxbridge-agent.patch
 - d/p/0005-Extend-QoS-L2-drivers-interface-to-handle-ingress-ru.patch
 - d/p/0006-add-missing-migration.patch


** Changed in: cloud-archive/ocata
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841700

Title:
  instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
  Invalid
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ocata series:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron source package in Xenial:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Environment]

  Xenial-Ocata deployment

  [Description]

  The instance ingress bandwidth limit implementation was targeted for
  Ocata [0], but the full implementation ingress/egress was done during
  the pike [1] cycle.

  However, isn't reported or explicit that ingress direction isn't
  supported in ocata, which causes the following exception when
  --ingress is specified.

  It would be desirable for this feature to be available on Ocata for being 
able to
  set ingress/egress bandwidth limits on the ports.

  [Testing]

  Without these patches, trying to set a ingress bandwidth-limit rule
  the following exception will be raised.

  $ openstack network qos rule create --type bandwidth-limit --max-kbps 300 
--max-burst-kbits 300 --ingress bw-limiter
  Failed to create Network QoS rule: BadRequestException: 400: Client Error for 
url: https://openstack:9696/v2.0/qos/policies//bandwidth_limit_rules, 
Unrecognized attribute(s) 'direction'

  A single policy set (without the --ingress parameter) as supported in
  Ocata will just create a limiter on the egress side.

  
  1) Check the policy list

  $ openstack network qos policy list
  
+--+++-+--+
  | ID | Name | Shared | Default | Project |
  
+--+++-+--+
  | 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938 | bw-limiter | False | None | 
c45b1c0a681d4d9788f911e29166056d |
  
+--+++-+--+

  2) Check that the qoes rule is set to 300 kbps.

  $ openstack network qos rule list 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938

  | 01eb228d-5803-4095-9e8e-f13d4312b2ef | 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-
  47895379c938 | bandwidth_limit | 300 | 300 | | | |

  
  3) Set the Qos policy on any port.

  $ openstack port set 9a74b3c8-9ed8-4670-ad1f-932febfcf059 --qos-policy
  2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938

  $ openstack port show 9a74b3c8-9ed8-4670-ad1f-932febfcf059 | grep qos
  | qos_policy_id | 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938 |

  
  4) Check that the egress traffic rules have been applied

  # iperf3 -c 192.168.21.9 -t 10
  Connecting to host 192.168.21.9, port 5201
  [ 4] local 192.168.21.3 port 34528 connected to 192.168.21.9 port 5201
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd
  [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 121 KBytes 988 Kbits/sec 23 2.44 KBytes
  [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 40.2 KBytes 330 Kbits/sec 14 3.66 KBytes
  [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 36.6 KBytes 299 Kbits/sec 15 2.44 KBytes
  [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 39.0 KBytes 320 Kbits/sec 18 3.66 KBytes
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 435 KBytes 356 Kbits/sec 159 sender
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 384 KBytes 314 Kbits/sec receiver

  iperf Done.

  5) Check that no ingress traffic limit has been applied.

  # iperf3 -c 192.168.21.9 -R -t 10
  Connecting to host 192.168.21.9, port 5201
  Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.21.9 is sending
  [ 4] local 192.168.21.3 port 34524 connected to 192.168.21.9 port 5201
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
  [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 38.1 MBytes 319 Mbits/sec
  [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 74.6 MBytes 626 Mbits/sec
  [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 73.2 MBytes 614 Mbits/sec
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 918 Mbits/sec 1045 sender
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 916 Mbits/sec receiver

  
  --->

  6) With the patches applied from the PPA or proposed, run the
  migration steps on the neutron-api node, repeat the previous 

[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1841700] Re: instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

2020-02-20 Thread Corey Bryant
@jorge, thanks. I've uploaded neutron 2:10.0.7-0ubuntu1~cloud3 which
will revert them.

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ocata
   Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841700

Title:
  instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
  Invalid
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ocata series:
  Won't Fix
Status in neutron:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron source package in Xenial:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Environment]

  Xenial-Ocata deployment

  [Description]

  The instance ingress bandwidth limit implementation was targeted for
  Ocata [0], but the full implementation ingress/egress was done during
  the pike [1] cycle.

  However, isn't reported or explicit that ingress direction isn't
  supported in ocata, which causes the following exception when
  --ingress is specified.

  It would be desirable for this feature to be available on Ocata for being 
able to
  set ingress/egress bandwidth limits on the ports.

  [Testing]

  Without these patches, trying to set a ingress bandwidth-limit rule
  the following exception will be raised.

  $ openstack network qos rule create --type bandwidth-limit --max-kbps 300 
--max-burst-kbits 300 --ingress bw-limiter
  Failed to create Network QoS rule: BadRequestException: 400: Client Error for 
url: https://openstack:9696/v2.0/qos/policies//bandwidth_limit_rules, 
Unrecognized attribute(s) 'direction'

  A single policy set (without the --ingress parameter) as supported in
  Ocata will just create a limiter on the egress side.

  
  1) Check the policy list

  $ openstack network qos policy list
  
+--+++-+--+
  | ID | Name | Shared | Default | Project |
  
+--+++-+--+
  | 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938 | bw-limiter | False | None | 
c45b1c0a681d4d9788f911e29166056d |
  
+--+++-+--+

  2) Check that the qoes rule is set to 300 kbps.

  $ openstack network qos rule list 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938

  | 01eb228d-5803-4095-9e8e-f13d4312b2ef | 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-
  47895379c938 | bandwidth_limit | 300 | 300 | | | |

  
  3) Set the Qos policy on any port.

  $ openstack port set 9a74b3c8-9ed8-4670-ad1f-932febfcf059 --qos-policy
  2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938

  $ openstack port show 9a74b3c8-9ed8-4670-ad1f-932febfcf059 | grep qos
  | qos_policy_id | 2c9c85e2-4b65-4146-b7bf-47895379c938 |

  
  4) Check that the egress traffic rules have been applied

  # iperf3 -c 192.168.21.9 -t 10
  Connecting to host 192.168.21.9, port 5201
  [ 4] local 192.168.21.3 port 34528 connected to 192.168.21.9 port 5201
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd
  [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 121 KBytes 988 Kbits/sec 23 2.44 KBytes
  [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 40.2 KBytes 330 Kbits/sec 14 3.66 KBytes
  [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 36.6 KBytes 299 Kbits/sec 15 2.44 KBytes
  [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 39.0 KBytes 320 Kbits/sec 18 3.66 KBytes
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 435 KBytes 356 Kbits/sec 159 sender
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 384 KBytes 314 Kbits/sec receiver

  iperf Done.

  5) Check that no ingress traffic limit has been applied.

  # iperf3 -c 192.168.21.9 -R -t 10
  Connecting to host 192.168.21.9, port 5201
  Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.21.9 is sending
  [ 4] local 192.168.21.3 port 34524 connected to 192.168.21.9 port 5201
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
  [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 38.1 MBytes 319 Mbits/sec
  [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 74.6 MBytes 626 Mbits/sec
  [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 73.2 MBytes 614 Mbits/sec
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 918 Mbits/sec 1045 sender
  [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 916 Mbits/sec receiver

  
  --->

  6) With the patches applied from the PPA or proposed, run the
  migration steps on the neutron-api node, repeat the previous steps,
  but make sure to specify the traffic direction with --ingress as
  follows:

  $ openstack network qos rule create --type bandwidth-limit --max-kbps 300 
--ingress testing-policy
  ++--+
  | Field | Value |
  ++--+
  | direction | ingress |
  | id | 6d01cefa-0042-40cd-ae74-bcb723ca7ca4 |
  | max_burst_kbps | 0 |
  | max_kbps | 300 |
  | name | None |
  | project_id | |
  ++--+

  7) Set the policy into any server port.

 

[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1841700] Re: instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

2019-09-23 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Also affects: cloud-archive/ocata
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841700

Title:
  instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
  Invalid
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ocata series:
  New
Status in neutron:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron source package in Xenial:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Environment]

  Xenial-Ocata deployment

  [Description]

  The instance ingress bandwidth limit implementation was targeted for
  Ocata [0], but the full implementation ingress/egress was done during
  the pike [1] cycle.

  However, isn't reported or explicit that ingress direction isn't
  supported in ocata, which causes the following exception when
  --ingress is specified.

  $ openstack network qos rule create --type bandwidth-limit --max-kbps 300 
--max-burst-kbits 300 --ingress bw-limiter
  Failed to create Network QoS rule: BadRequestException: 400: Client Error for 
url: https://openstack:9696/v2.0/qos/policies//bandwidth_limit_rules, 
Unrecognized attribute(s) 'direction'

  It would be desirable for this feature to be available on Ocata for being 
able to 
  set ingress/egress bandwidth limits on the ports.

  [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/instance-ingress-bw-limit
  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1560961

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1841700/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
Post to : group.of.nepali.translators@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1841700] Re: instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

2019-09-02 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Also affects: cloud-archive
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron
   Status: Invalid => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841700

Title:
  instance ingress bandwidth limiting doesn't works in ocata.

Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
  New
Status in neutron:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in neutron source package in Xenial:
  New

Bug description:
  [Environment]

  Xenial-Ocata deployment

  [Description]

  The instance ingress bandwidth limit implementation was targeted for
  Ocata [0], but the full implementation ingress/egress was done during
  the pike [1] cycle.

  However, isn't reported or explicit that ingress direction isn't
  supported in ocata, which causes the following exception when
  --ingress is specified.

  $ openstack network qos rule create --type bandwidth-limit --max-kbps 300 
--max-burst-kbits 300 --ingress bw-limiter
  Failed to create Network QoS rule: BadRequestException: 400: Client Error for 
url: https://openstack:9696/v2.0/qos/policies//bandwidth_limit_rules, 
Unrecognized attribute(s) 'direction'

  It would be desirable for this feature to be available on Ocata for being 
able to 
  set ingress/egress bandwidth limits on the ports.

  [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/instance-ingress-bw-limit
  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1560961

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1841700/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
Post to : group.of.nepali.translators@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~group.of.nepali.translators
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp