[GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-rel-00.txt
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-grow-bmp-rel-00.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Global Routing Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF. Title: Logging of routing events in BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Authors: Paolo Lucente Camilo Cardona Name:draft-ietf-grow-bmp-rel-00.txt Pages: 8 Dates: 2023-12-07 Abstract: The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) does provision for BGP session event logging (Peer Up, Peer Down), state synchronization (Route Monitoring), debugging (Route Mirroring) and Statistics messages, among the others. This document defines a new Route Event Logging (REL) message type for BMP with the aim of covering use-cases with affinity to alerting, reporting and on-change analysis. The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-rel/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-rel-00 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
Re: [GROW] The GROW WG has placed draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Dear GROW, I support the adoption of the document. Some comments for the authors: I suggest to reference RFC 9494 in TBD6 of section 2.1 to clearly describe the meaning. Regarding TBD5, the meaning of "marked as stale by any configuration" is unclear to me. Please describe in more detail. Would you consider to align the proposed counters to what is being defined in section 2.1 of BMP path status https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-00#section-2.1 ? >From an operator perspective, this would make a lot of sense since depending >on use case a statistical peering or per path view is needed. Best wishes Thomas -Original Message- From: GROW On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 6:18 PM To: draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-st...@ietf.org; grow-cha...@ietf.org; grow@ietf.org Subject: [GROW] The GROW WG has placed draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" Be aware: This is an external email. The GROW WG has placed draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Job Snijders) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats/ ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
Re: [GROW] The GROW WG has placed draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsecupd in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Dear GROW, I support the adoption of document. It gives a network operator a good overview on BGP security considerations. Best wishes Thomas -Original Message- From: GROW On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 6:17 PM To: draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsec...@ietf.org; grow-cha...@ietf.org; grow@ietf.org Subject: [GROW] The GROW WG has placed draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsecupd in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" Be aware: This is an external email. The GROW WG has placed draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsecupd in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Job Snijders) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsecupd/ ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
Re: [GROW] The GROW WG has placed draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communities in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Dear GROW, I support the adoption of the document. Some comments for the authors: I suggest to reference RFC 9494 in TBD6 of section 2.1 to clearly describe the meaning. Regarding TBD5, the meaning of "marked as stale by any configuration" is unclear to me. Please describe in more detail. Would you consider to align the proposed counters to what is being defined in section 2.1 of BMP path status https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-00#section-2.1 ? >From an operator perspective, this would make a lot of sense since depending >on use case a statistical peering or per path view is needed. Best wishes Thomas -Original Message- From: GROW On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 6:19 PM To: draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communit...@ietf.org; grow-cha...@ietf.org; grow@ietf.org Subject: [GROW] The GROW WG has placed draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communities in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" Be aware: This is an external email. The GROW WG has placed draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communities in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Job Snijders) The document was previously in state Candidate for WG Adoption The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communities/ ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
