high light/selection color from

2008-02-27 Thread Steve Splonskowski
Hello,

I would like to get the selection/high light color for the currently  
selected UI theme (as setup in the Appearance Preferences panel).

Can someone point me to how I can get this color via GTK?


thanks,
steve
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list


Re: Printing

2008-02-27 Thread Bastiaan Veelo
Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
 Enrico Tröger wrote:
   
 8) When exporting to PDF on Windows, trying to overwrite an existing 
 file, the program crashes (oops!). This works fine on Linux.
 
   
 I can't reproduce this, on my Windows 2000 box I can overwrite existing
 files as expected.
   
 

 Now I cannot reproduce either. I don't know what went wrong.
OK, now I know. The crash happens when writing to a file that is 
currently open for reading, and that is because I did not check the 
cairo status. Sorry, my mistake.
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list


Re: Text View Complaining about Double Free or Corruption

2008-02-27 Thread Mark Rodriguez
James,

  When doe s the error occur?
  0. When program starts
  1. When shutting down
  2. When creating the text_view the first time
  3. When creating the text_view the Nth time

  I will assume it happens durin shutdown (#1).

Yes you are correct. In the real application, the application
doesn't exit. It destroys the canvas and re-uses it with new controls.
Rather than debug that [monster], I reduced the application to
something more manageable that exhibit the same behavior.

  Yes, it should be handled like any other widget.  The only special thing is
 its text_buffer!  Consider gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer(), one is created
 automatically for when using the gtk_text_view_new() api.  I don't think
 creating the GtkTextBuffer first would make any difference -- however, that
 where you are now.  So try creating the GtkTextBuffer first, then use the
 ...with_buffer() api to create the view.  This may produce a different
 result.

Interesting. I tried a few different things today and was able to get
the application to work as expected without crashing, but I don't like
the solution as now it appears I'm leaking memory. Any thoughts on why
if g_object_unref is called the application complains about the double
free? I modified the code as follows (mainly the button_click_event
handler was changed to handle the text buffer and to require clicking
the 'Quit' button twice for exiting the app - this was just done for
visibility reasons).

[code]
GtkWidget *main_window, *text_view, *box, *button;
GtkTextBuffer* buffer;

static void destroy_event(GtkWidget* widget, void* data)
{
gtk_main_quit();
}

static void button_click_event(void)
{
if (text_view != NULL)
{
gtk_container_remove(GTK_CONTAINER(box), text_view);
text_view = NULL;
// leaking memory???
//  g_object_unref(G_OBJECT(buffer));
buffer = NULL;
}
else
{
gtk_widget_destroy(main_window);
main_window = NULL;
}
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
// initialize multi-threading within GLib
g_thread_init(NULL);

// initialize multi-threading within GDK
gdk_threads_init();

// acquire thread lock
gdk_threads_enter();
gtk_init(argc, argv);

// create main window
main_window = gtk_window_new(GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL);
if (main_window == NULL)
abort();
g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(main_window), destroy,
G_CALLBACK(destroy_event), NULL);
gtk_widget_show(main_window);

box = gtk_vbox_new(FALSE, 5);
if (box == NULL)
abort();
gtk_widget_show(box);
gtk_container_add(GTK_CONTAINER(main_window), box);

buffer = gtk_text_buffer_new(NULL);
if (buffer == NULL)
abort();

text_view = gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer(buffer);
if (text_view == NULL)
abort();
gtk_widget_show(text_view);
gtk_box_pack_start(GTK_BOX(box), text_view, TRUE, TRUE, 5);

button = gtk_button_new_with_label(Quit);
if (button == NULL)
abort();
g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(button), clicked,
G_CALLBACK(button_click_event), NULL);
gtk_widget_show(button);
gtk_box_pack_start(GTK_BOX(box), button, TRUE, TRUE, 5);

// run the main loop
gtk_main();

// release thread lock
gdk_threads_leave();

return 0;
}
[/code]


-- 
Mark
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list


Re: Text View Complaining about Double Free or Corruption

2008-02-27 Thread James Scott Jr

On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 21:03 -0500, Mark Rodriguez wrote:

 James,
 
   When doe s the error occur?
   0. When program starts
   1. When shutting down
   2. When creating the text_view the first time
   3. When creating the text_view the Nth time
 
   I will assume it happens durin shutdown (#1).
 
 Yes you are correct. In the real application, the application
 doesn't exit. It destroys the canvas and re-uses it with new controls.
 Rather than debug that [monster], I reduced the application to
 something more manageable that exhibit the same behavior.
 
   Yes, it should be handled like any other widget.  The only special thing is
  its text_buffer!  Consider gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer(), one is created
  automatically for when using the gtk_text_view_new() api.  I don't think
  creating the GtkTextBuffer first would make any difference -- however, that
  where you are now.  So try creating the GtkTextBuffer first, then use the
  ...with_buffer() api to create the view.  This may produce a different
  result.
 
 Interesting. I tried a few different things today and was able to get
 the application to work as expected without crashing, but I don't like
 the solution as now it appears I'm leaking memory. Any thoughts on why
 if g_object_unref is called the application complains about the double
 free? I modified the code as follows (mainly the button_click_event
 handler was changed to handle the text buffer and to require clicking
 the 'Quit' button twice for exiting the app - this was just done for
 visibility reasons).
 

ref's are strange things: When I run into this anomaly I do the
following, reasoning that I must have only had a weak reference, and
g_object_unref got confused -- anyway this normally works for me.

/* creation code ... */
...
   buffer = gtk_text_buffer_new(NULL);
   if (buffer != NULL) {
 g_object_ref (G_OBJECT(buffer));
 gtk_object_sink (G_OBJECT(buffer));   
   }

sinking it ensures that you have a full fledged reference that a later
unref will honor.  

If your creating and deleting this text_view as needed, you will have to
find the root cause of these messages.  I notice that you prep'ed the
main() to use threads.  Your problem maybe related to how your using
threads when creating/destroying the text view.  I would suggest
exploring this type of change.  

1a. Only create/destroy in the main gtk/gdk thread.

1b. Fire off a g_timeout_add( 50, (GSourceFunc)fn_create_routine(),
gpointer); where gboolean fn_create_routine(gpointer gp); calls the
normal gtk_window_new() stuff to create a dialog or the window you plan
to use the text_view in.  All this gets you out of the normal gtk signal
chain of events.  signals iterate on themselves and I've seen unwinds
cause random errors - like your double-free.

1c. Do essentially the same to destroy the window.

2a. I guess I don't actually delete/destroy main windows once created, I
just hide them and present them again when needed.
2b. Or if I do destroy them, i keep the buffer and/or tree_model in a
allocated memory structure.  Thus gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer() is the
type of call I most often use to create text_views.

3.  You seem to be _show() ing objects before adding them to something.
Look at vbox; you create it, show it, then add it to the main.window.
The recommended style is to create, add, show.   I don't think causes
any immediate problems but it could be polluting something- anyway this
strikes me as something worth cleaning up.


James,




 [code]
 GtkWidget *main_window, *text_view, *box, *button;
 GtkTextBuffer* buffer;
 
 static void destroy_event(GtkWidget* widget, void* data)
 {
   gtk_main_quit();
 }
 
 static void button_click_event(void)
 {
   if (text_view != NULL)
   {
   gtk_container_remove(GTK_CONTAINER(box), text_view);
   text_view = NULL;
   // leaking memory???
 //g_object_unref(G_OBJECT(buffer));
   buffer = NULL;
   }
   else
   {
   gtk_widget_destroy(main_window);
   main_window = NULL;
   }
 }
 
 int main(int argc, char* argv[])
 {
   // initialize multi-threading within GLib
   g_thread_init(NULL);
 
   // initialize multi-threading within GDK
   gdk_threads_init();
 
   // acquire thread lock
   gdk_threads_enter();
   gtk_init(argc, argv);
 
   // create main window
   main_window = gtk_window_new(GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL);
   if (main_window == NULL)
   abort();
   g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(main_window), destroy,
 G_CALLBACK(destroy_event), NULL);
   gtk_widget_show(main_window);
 
   box = gtk_vbox_new(FALSE, 5);
   if (box == NULL)
   abort();
   gtk_widget_show(box);
   gtk_container_add(GTK_CONTAINER(main_window), box);
 
   buffer = gtk_text_buffer_new(NULL);
   if (buffer == NULL)
   abort();
 
   text_view = 

Re: Text View Complaining about Double Free or Corruption

2008-02-27 Thread James Scott Jr
g_object_ref_sink() replaces gtk_object_sink() 

Please make this substitution

James, 


On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 00:04 -0500, James Scott Jr wrote:

 On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 21:03 -0500, Mark Rodriguez wrote:
 
  James,
  
When doe s the error occur?
0. When program starts
1. When shutting down
2. When creating the text_view the first time
3. When creating the text_view the Nth time
  
I will assume it happens durin shutdown (#1).
  
  Yes you are correct. In the real application, the application
  doesn't exit. It destroys the canvas and re-uses it with new controls.
  Rather than debug that [monster], I reduced the application to
  something more manageable that exhibit the same behavior.
  
Yes, it should be handled like any other widget.  The only special thing 
   is
   its text_buffer!  Consider gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer(), one is created
   automatically for when using the gtk_text_view_new() api.  I don't think
   creating the GtkTextBuffer first would make any difference -- however, 
   that
   where you are now.  So try creating the GtkTextBuffer first, then use the
   ...with_buffer() api to create the view.  This may produce a different
   result.
  
  Interesting. I tried a few different things today and was able to get
  the application to work as expected without crashing, but I don't like
  the solution as now it appears I'm leaking memory. Any thoughts on why
  if g_object_unref is called the application complains about the double
  free? I modified the code as follows (mainly the button_click_event
  handler was changed to handle the text buffer and to require clicking
  the 'Quit' button twice for exiting the app - this was just done for
  visibility reasons).
  
 
 ref's are strange things: When I run into this anomaly I do the
 following, reasoning that I must have only had a weak reference, and
 g_object_unref got confused -- anyway this normally works for me.
 
 /* creation code ... */
 ...
buffer = gtk_text_buffer_new(NULL);
if (buffer != NULL) {
  g_object_ref (G_OBJECT(buffer));
  gtk_object_sink (G_OBJECT(buffer));   
}
 
 sinking it ensures that you have a full fledged reference that a later
 unref will honor.  
 
 If your creating and deleting this text_view as needed, you will have to
 find the root cause of these messages.  I notice that you prep'ed the
 main() to use threads.  Your problem maybe related to how your using
 threads when creating/destroying the text view.  I would suggest
 exploring this type of change.  
 
 1a. Only create/destroy in the main gtk/gdk thread.
 
 1b. Fire off a g_timeout_add( 50, (GSourceFunc)fn_create_routine(),
 gpointer); where gboolean fn_create_routine(gpointer gp); calls the
 normal gtk_window_new() stuff to create a dialog or the window you plan
 to use the text_view in.  All this gets you out of the normal gtk signal
 chain of events.  signals iterate on themselves and I've seen unwinds
 cause random errors - like your double-free.
 
 1c. Do essentially the same to destroy the window.
 
 2a. I guess I don't actually delete/destroy main windows once created, I
 just hide them and present them again when needed.
 2b. Or if I do destroy them, i keep the buffer and/or tree_model in a
 allocated memory structure.  Thus gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer() is the
 type of call I most often use to create text_views.
 
 3.  You seem to be _show() ing objects before adding them to something.
 Look at vbox; you create it, show it, then add it to the main.window.
 The recommended style is to create, add, show.   I don't think causes
 any immediate problems but it could be polluting something- anyway this
 strikes me as something worth cleaning up.
 
 
 James,
 
 
 
 
  [code]
  GtkWidget *main_window, *text_view, *box, *button;
  GtkTextBuffer* buffer;
  
  static void destroy_event(GtkWidget* widget, void* data)
  {
  gtk_main_quit();
  }
  
  static void button_click_event(void)
  {
  if (text_view != NULL)
  {
  gtk_container_remove(GTK_CONTAINER(box), text_view);
  text_view = NULL;
  // leaking memory???
  //  g_object_unref(G_OBJECT(buffer));
  buffer = NULL;
  }
  else
  {
  gtk_widget_destroy(main_window);
  main_window = NULL;
  }
  }
  
  int main(int argc, char* argv[])
  {
  // initialize multi-threading within GLib
  g_thread_init(NULL);
  
  // initialize multi-threading within GDK
  gdk_threads_init();
  
  // acquire thread lock
  gdk_threads_enter();
  gtk_init(argc, argv);
  
  // create main window
  main_window = gtk_window_new(GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL);
  if (main_window == NULL)
  abort();
  g_signal_connect(G_OBJECT(main_window), destroy,
  G_CALLBACK(destroy_event), NULL);
  gtk_widget_show(main_window);
  
  box = gtk_vbox_new(FALSE, 5);
  if (box == NULL)
  abort();