RE: poll with timeout 0 in main loop

2010-10-22 Thread Juan Pablo L .

this is almost the complete code. you can see all the flow here.
basically, the main.c starts the server thread (gm_tcp_server), inside the 
server thread the application sits waiting for new connection, just sitting 
waiting consumes 100% of the CPU (without accepting any connection yet), the 
code of the server is in file gm_tcp_server.c. the rest of the code is just in 
case you need it for reference.

thanks!

 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:17:30 +0100
 From: ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk
 To: jpablolorenze...@hotmail.com
 CC: maginot.jun...@gmail.com; gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: poll with timeout 0 in main loop
 
 On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:57:59 +
 Juan Pablo L. jpablolorenze...@hotmail.com wrote:
  hi, this is the code that makes the server socket
 [snip]
 
 There doesn't seem anything especially wrong with this but you have a
 lot of code missing.  In particular, what does your
 tcp_server_handle_connection_events() callback do, such as when it
 encounters errors (you specify that the callback is to be entered in a
 case of G_IO_NVAL and G_IO_ERR), and how do you disconnect sources from
 the main loop when they are finished with (I notice also you don't
 unref the sources after attaching them to the main loop).  Quite
 possibly you are looping in a case of errors or defunct sources.
 
 Probably the best thing you can do is come up with the smallest test
 case which demonstrates the error (with say just one socket worker
 thread) and post it here.
 
 This is off topic, but glib's gio makes it trivial to construct new
 server threads and it does all the hard stuff for you, but you need
 glib version 2.22 for gio's socket API.  Glib's gio has no relationship
 with GIOChannels, despite the similar names.
 
 Chris
  ___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

RE: poll with timeout 0 in main loop

2010-10-22 Thread Juan Pablo L .

i attached the code but did not make thru, here is the server code:

GMTCPServer *tcp_server_new(const Configurations *p_configurations)
{
GMTCPServer *new_server;
GError *error = NULL;
int fd;


// create a new tcp server object
new_server = g_new(GMTCPServer,1);

// get the configurations reference
new_server-configurations = p_configurations;
// create the context for this thread
new_server-context = g_main_context_new();

// initialize the list of clients
new_server-clients_list = 
g_ptr_array_new_with_free_func((void*)gm_connection_destroy);

// create the server socket
fd = tcp_server_listerner_new(new_server-configurations,error);
if(fd  0)
{
g_error(Could not create listener, server creation aborted: 
%s,error-message);
g_error_free(error);
return NULL;
}

// create the GIOChannel for the server socket
new_server-socket = g_io_channel_unix_new(fd);
// set the encoding safe to read binary data on the server GIOChannel
g_io_channel_set_encoding(new_server-socket,NULL,NULL);

// create a source for connection events on the server socket
new_server-event_source = 
g_io_create_watch(new_server-socket,G_IO_IN|G_IO_PRI|G_IO_ERR|G_IO_HUP|G_IO_NVAL);
// set the callback function to handle connection events

g_source_set_callback(new_server-event_source,(GSourceFunc)tcp_server_handle_connection_events,new_server,NULL);
// attach the server socket connection event source to the server context
g_source_attach(new_server-event_source,new_server-context);

// create the callback event source
new_server-callback_source = async_callback_new();
// attach the callback event source to the context
g_source_attach(new_server-callback_source,new_server-context);

// create the main loop for this thread
new_server-main_loop = g_main_loop_new(new_server-context,FALSE);

// the thread will be started later
new_server-server_thread = NULL;

return new_server;
}

void tcp_server_destroy(GMTCPServer *p_server)
{
g_message(Destroying GoMobile server ...);

// quit the main loop
g_main_loop_quit(p_server-main_loop);

// join the server thread
if(p_server-server_thread != NULL)
{
g_thread_join(p_server-server_thread);
}

// remove the server socket connection event source from the context
g_source_destroy(p_server-event_source);

// remove callback event source from the server context
g_source_destroy(p_server-callback_source);

// close and free server socket resources
g_io_channel_shutdown(p_server-socket,TRUE,NULL);

// close all client connections
g_ptr_array_free(p_server-clients_list,TRUE);

// free resources associated with event source
g_source_unref(p_server-event_source);

// free resources associated with the callback event source
g_source_unref(p_server-callback_source);

// free the resources in the server socket
g_io_channel_unref(p_server-socket);

// destroy the main loop
g_main_loop_unref(p_server-main_loop);

// free the context resources
g_main_context_unref(p_server-context);

// delete the memory allocated by the tcp object itself
g_free(p_server);

g_message(Done);
}

void tcp_server_run(GMTCPServer *p_server)
{
// run the main loop now
g_main_loop_run(p_server-main_loop);

g_thread_exit(NULL);
}

int tcp_server_listerner_new(const Configurations *p_configurations,GError 
**p_error)
{
int fd;
struct sockaddr_in servAddr;
int set_option = 1;

// create the socket
fd = socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,IPPROTO_TCP);
if(fd  0)
{
*p_error = 
g_error_new(G_IO_CHANNEL_ERROR,G_IO_CHANNEL_ERROR_FAILED,Could not create 
server socket: %s,strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
// set some options on the socket
fcntl(fd,F_SETFL,O_NONBLOCK);// set the socket non-blocking
setsockopt(fd,SOL_SOCKET,SO_REUSEADDR,set_option,sizeof(set_option));// 
reuse address
setsockopt(fd,SOL_SOCKET,SO_KEEPALIVE,set_option,sizeof(set_option));// 
send keep alive messages

// construct local address structure
memset(servAddr,0x00, sizeof(servAddr));
servAddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
servAddr.sin_addr.s_addr = 
inet_addr(p_configurations-tcp_server.interface);
servAddr.sin_port = htons(p_configurations-tcp_server.port);
// Bind to the local address
if(bind(fd,(struct sockaddr*)servAddr,sizeof(servAddr))  0)
{
*p_error = 
g_error_new(G_IO_CHANNEL_ERROR,G_IO_CHANNEL_ERROR_FAILED,Could not bind server 
socket: %s,strerror(errno));
// close the socket
close(fd);
return -1;
}
if(listen(fd,10)  0)
{
*p_error = 
g_error_new(G_IO_CHANNEL_ERROR,G_IO_CHANNEL_ERROR_FAILED,Could not start 
listening on the server socket: %s,strerror(errno));
// close the socket
close(fd);
return -1;
}

return fd;
}


Re: poll with timeout 0 in main loop

2010-10-22 Thread Chris Vine
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:37:01 +
Juan Pablo L. jpablolorenze...@hotmail.com wrote:
 i attached the code but did not make thru, here is the server code:

Something odd is going on.

I see you are using GIOChannel not to do any reading, but in order to
notify you that a connection is available.  poll()/select() of course
support this in unix-like systems, but I don't know if GIOChannel
does (I have never tried). Possibly it only works if you set the channel
as non-blocking with g_io_channel_set_flags() rather than by
manipulating the file descriptor directly, which you have done.  Again,
I don't know.

Sending snippets of code really isn't going to help.  It could of
course be other things, such as you not having initialized glib for
threads correctly. You need to send the simplest test case which
demonstrates the problem, in compilable form: given the nature of
the problem you should be able to reproduce it with very simple code.

Chris
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list


Re: poll with timeout 0 in main loop

2010-10-22 Thread Chris Vine
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:53:55 +0100
Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:

 On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:37:01 +
 Juan Pablo L. jpablolorenze...@hotmail.com wrote:
  i attached the code but did not make thru, here is the server code:
 
 Something odd is going on.
 
 I see you are using GIOChannel not to do any reading, but in order to
 notify you that a connection is available.  poll()/select() of course
 support this in unix-like systems, but I don't know if GIOChannel
 does (I have never tried). Possibly it only works if you set the
 channel as non-blocking with g_io_channel_set_flags() rather than by
 manipulating the file descriptor directly, which you have done.
 Again, I don't know.

Actually, in this usage (attaching the file descriptor of a listening
socket to a main loop) there is no need to make the file descriptor
non-blocking since you will not make any blocking calls on it until you
actually get to call accept() to establish the connection, and you may
get undefined behaviour if you do - I don't know what POSIX says about
that when you attempt to use poll() with it.  Once poll() indicates
that a connection is available, accept() can't block anyway.

Does it work if you omit your call to fctl()?

Chris
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list


RE: poll with timeout 0 in main loop

2010-10-22 Thread Juan Pablo L .

Hi Chris, yes it works without setting it as non-blocking so i decided to leave 
none blocking just in case .. :)  anyways
i was preparing the test code to send to you guys but i discovered that in the 
test code the cpu usage is 0% (as i would expect in the real application)  ... 
the code i was going to send was a stripped version of the original code so 
that ... but there is something that might be very important but have not 
mention yet . i also created a GSource to run functions in other main loops 
(for example i use this to fire the connection cleaning code in the server when 
a connection dies) asynchronously, anyways, this is makes me very suspicious 
now:

static gboolean async_callback_prepare(GSource *p_source,int *p_timeout)
{
AsyncCallbackSource *async_source = (AsyncCallbackSource *)p_source;
gboolean ret;

*p_timeout = 0;
g_mutex_lock(async_source-mutex1);
ret = g_queue_is_empty(async_source-callback_list);
g_mutex_unlock(async_source-mutex1);

return !ret;
}
   


i think i misunderstood the documentation here and maybe this is the 0 being 
passed to poll ???  i think i will test this in the real code and let you know 
asap 



 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:27:54 +0100
 From: ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk
 To: ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk
 CC: jpablolorenze...@hotmail.com; gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: poll with timeout 0 in main loop
 
 On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:53:55 +0100
 Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
 
  On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:37:01 +
  Juan Pablo L. jpablolorenze...@hotmail.com wrote:
   i attached the code but did not make thru, here is the server code:
  
  Something odd is going on.
  
  I see you are using GIOChannel not to do any reading, but in order to
  notify you that a connection is available.  poll()/select() of course
  support this in unix-like systems, but I don't know if GIOChannel
  does (I have never tried). Possibly it only works if you set the
  channel as non-blocking with g_io_channel_set_flags() rather than by
  manipulating the file descriptor directly, which you have done.
  Again, I don't know.
 
 Actually, in this usage (attaching the file descriptor of a listening
 socket to a main loop) there is no need to make the file descriptor
 non-blocking since you will not make any blocking calls on it until you
 actually get to call accept() to establish the connection, and you may
 get undefined behaviour if you do - I don't know what POSIX says about
 that when you attempt to use poll() with it.  Once poll() indicates
 that a connection is available, accept() can't block anyway.
 
 Does it work if you omit your call to fctl()?
 
 Chris
  
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list