Re: Problem sending double with GDbus
Hi, thanks for your reply. I just filed the bug on gnome bugtracker. I also tried today with glibc, but the problem is still there. Regards, Bernhard Schuster wrote: Did you already report the problem to the related bugtracker? Did check if it works wit glibc? Regards Bernhard ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Problem-sending-double-with-GDbus-tp32691864p32876162.html Sent from the Gtk+ - Apps Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Bug 660761
Please can glib devs give https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660761 a little love? Its been a month and a half since I posted the last patch and there has been no traction on it. Thanks in advance, Kean ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Bug 660761
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:28:55AM +0200, Kean Johnston wrote: Please can glib devs give https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660761 a little love? Its been a month and a half since I posted the last patch and there has been no traction on it. Suggestion: Best to always copy/paste the summary. No clue what it is about, too lazy to click as likely not for me (not a dev) :P -- Regards, Olav ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Bug 660761
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:32:41AM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:28:55AM +0200, Kean Johnston wrote: Please can glib devs give https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660761 a little love? Its been a month and a half since I posted the last patch and there has been no traction on it. Suggestion: Best to always copy/paste the summary. No clue what it is about, too lazy to click as likely not for me (not a dev) :P glib/gmodule: Give builder opportunity to change DLL extension There are a few places where the extension of .dll is hard-coded. While it is true that this is most often the right name, there are circumstances where it is useful for the person compiling GLib to be able to use something else. For example, when compiling both 32-bit and 64-bit versions to sit side by side it is useful to have 32-bit extensions have one suffix (say, .x32) and 64-bit versions to have another (say, .x64). The attached patch provides the person compiling GLib with just that flexibility, and doesn't change any defaults. Just providing the lookup service ;-) Cheers, Patrick ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
