Re: 2.90 branch
Am Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:47:48 +0200 schrieb Christian Dywan christ...@lanedo.com: Am Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:04:54 +0200 schrieb Javier Jardón javierjc1...@gmail.com: Hello, I've read here [1] about the creation of a GTK+ branch for GTK+ 2.90/3.0 development after 2.14 has been released. GTK+ 2.18 has been released and I think that no branch was created, is there any plans to create that branch soon? Best Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/Tasks#Q0 Hey Javier, I actually started to look into doing that this week. I think we have resolved all but a handful of sealing/ accessor issues at this point, and at least some of the GTK+ hackers seem to share the sentiment. So I think it's a good time. So I guess I should try to organize this a bit, and see if I can attract some bears to the honey. I started a local branch gtk-2.90, where I began to remove deprecated classes and functions which basically is #Q1. Question: do others agree, and can I push the branch to git.gnome.org so everybody can join the effort? For the record, I pushed the gtk-2.90 branch now, it almost compiles, that is I need to fix GtkInputDialog which uses deprecated functions and a few tests also still use old API. Anybody is welcome to help out, preferrably poke here or poke me in #gtk+ (kalikiana) before so we don't end up duplicating work. I rebased the branch once so far, Emanuelle offered to do that in the future. There's also http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/3.0/Tasks in the wiki. What I did so far is #Q0, creating the branch, and #Q1, removing deprecated code. ciao, Christian ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: 2.90 branch
2009/9/30 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com: sure. I asked around on #gtk+ after GUADEC for the best day/time to maximize attendance - the default being on Tuesday at 20:00 UTC. if anyone has issues with the day/time then feel free to contact me either on gtk-devel-list, in private or on IRC. otherwise, we can have a IRC meeting next Tuesday (October 6th); this should give people enough time to schedule stuff around. :-) +1 ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi, W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list -- Un saludo, Alberto Ruiz ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: 2.90 branch
Am Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:04:54 +0200 schrieb Javier Jardón javierjc1...@gmail.com: Hello, I've read here [1] about the creation of a GTK+ branch for GTK+ 2.90/3.0 development after 2.14 has been released. GTK+ 2.18 has been released and I think that no branch was created, is there any plans to create that branch soon? Best Regards [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/Tasks#Q0 Hey Javier, I actually started to look into doing that this week. I think we have resolved all but a handful of sealing/ accessor issues at this point, and at least some of the GTK+ hackers seem to share the sentiment. So I think it's a good time. So I guess I should try to organize this a bit, and see if I can attract some bears to the honey. I started a local branch gtk-2.90, where I began to remove deprecated classes and functions which basically is #Q1. Question: do others agree, and can I push the branch to git.gnome.org so everybody can join the effort? A GTK+ meeting would probably be a good idea, to plan 2.20/ 2.90. Emmanuelle, do you want to revive the meeting? ciao, Christian ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: 2.90 branch
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 18:47 +0200, Christian Dywan wrote: I started a local branch gtk-2.90, where I began to remove deprecated classes and functions which basically is #Q1. Question: do others agree, and can I push the branch to git.gnome.org so everybody can join the effort? having a branch would surely be good. A GTK+ meeting would probably be a good idea, to plan 2.20/ 2.90. Emmanuelle, do you want to revive the meeting? sure. I asked around on #gtk+ after GUADEC for the best day/time to maximize attendance - the default being on Tuesday at 20:00 UTC. if anyone has issues with the day/time then feel free to contact me either on gtk-devel-list, in private or on IRC. otherwise, we can have a IRC meeting next Tuesday (October 6th); this should give people enough time to schedule stuff around. :-) ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi, W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
GTK 2.90 branch schedule
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 01:43 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: Our plans from last year were aiming for a parallel 2.90 release at the same time. Since I haven't heard an update from the 3.0 drivers, I can't say if that is still realistic at this point. I'll try to ping people from Lanedo and see if there's any way we can get a status update on this. I know they're busy with other things, but maybe someone can be convinced to comment on what is left to be done before 2.90 can be branched. If that information is at least documented somewhere (even just an email to the list) then other hackers can help do some of the work on that. I'd be happy to try to help with this however I can. / Cody ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
