Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
Hi Sergei, On Thu, 31 May 2007 15:22:08 -0700 (PDT) you wrote: FOSS is also about freedom of speech. WTF? How is that supposed to be relevant? To shut me up develop a better/easier for end user way of building. No, the best way is for you to stop being such a spammer and restrict yourself to answering the point asked rather than plugging your product at every possible opportunity. You're behaving like one of those wannabee author celebrities who turn up on chat shows ostensibly to be interesting and spend all the time plugging their new book. The simple fact is, if every single post you contribute says why not use AppsFromScratch? Look what it can do! then I would consider anyone choosing to blacklist you as perfectly justified. Is that how a person wishing to contribute to the community wants to come across? If your product is good, we'll all start using it on the recommendation of others. If it's so bad that you need to push it with all the arrogance and persistence of Microsoft then I'm not even going to take a look. ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
If your product is good, we'll all start using it on the recommendation of others. If it's so bad that you need to push it with all the arrogance and persistence of Microsoft then I'm not even going to take a look. ___ Happy manual environment variables setting, installing as root and screwing up your system consequently. This list is full of questions about gtk+ building; every time people have to set environment variables manually and tediously build dependencies. For me it's sufficient that one guy highly appreciated the tool in the spring of 2006, because it allowed him to build and deploy 'gtk+' and 'glade' in the company he was working for. He, however, was also a Perl guy, and was constructively lazy - similar to myself. So, please do me a favor and continue all this boring manual work related to building, never-ever even think of trying my tool. FWIW, Microsoft spoiled general population by showing it that properly built software can be on-click-installed. So, I'm working in the direction of one-click-build software tool. --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- Ana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:52:02AM +0200, David Ne?as (Yeti) wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: FOSS is also about freedom of speech. So, you and others are entitled to have your opinion about what I'm saying, but I will be posting what _I_ think is relevant and necessary. As you might or might not notice, no one tried to deprive you of the freedom of speech. The problem is in the form. Do not be surprised if you end up not being listened to, even with all your freedom of speech. (Hm, this would probably weigh more if someone else said it.) Forgive me Sergei, but I started deleting your email, on site, quite a while ago. You may wish to Google: shameless self-promotion netiquette Here's an example of what's returned: http://www.passionatepen.com/netiquettearticle.htm - Ana ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list Sounds great - still, since you've replied to me. If you want to look consistent, just ignore me altogether, OK ? :-) --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:31:31AM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: FWIW, Microsoft spoiled general population by showing it that properly built software can be on-click-installed. So, I'm working in the direction of one-click-build software tool. No, you are not as I explained this to you once already. Unless you create something that software authors start actively using themselves, i.e. it gets incorporated to the packages (as it happened with autoconf, for instance), you have only two options: - fail - fail some time later The idea of maintaining all the build information for all packages in some centralized perl file just does not scale. So, yes, you wrote a tool that can help some people in some situations. Good work. But have not solved any of the underlying problems -- in fact you are not even attempting. Yeti -- http://gwyddion.net/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- David Neèas (Yeti) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The idea of maintaining all the build information for all packages in some centralized perl file just does not scale. I think you didn't quite get the idea and/or not quite familiar with Perl. Yes, it is true there is a number of Perl files. The two most important ones are: default_target_build_sub.prl default_build_data_sub.prl . The first of them is what its name says, and the second is currently configuration data and patches, i.e. small pieces of code that work around the wide variety of developers' inconsistencies, to begin from inconsistent naming conventions. Now about possible unfamiliarity with Perl. If you have a piece of code like this: ... $u = 1; $v = 2; $x = 3; $y = 4; ... , you can split it into, say, two files: file1.pl will contain $u = 1; $v = 2; and file2.pl will contain $x = 3; $y = 4; , so the whole above piece of code can be rewritten this way: ... do file1.pl; do file2.pl; ... . I mean that, for example, I or anybody else can split default_build_data_sub.prl into file per target, and/or, for example, to put 'gtk+' with all its dependencies in one file or whatever in a similar manner. 'do' can be nested. For an end user whop is not going to add targets and/or to modify the code it doesn't matter, this is because for quite a time it is possible to specify targets to built on command line. ... It's really ridiculous to read every other day posts of people suffering from unproperly set PKG_CONFIG_PATH and friends and the standard advice to check them. I mean, the ridiculous part is the ever repeating itself advice to do manual job. --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ ___ You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
The world is full of frustrated people who invented the perfect software building, packaging and distribution systems. Something to think over... Yeti And who said the word perfect ? And how can software building be perfect if there is no limitations on how the sources are generated, and thus no way to automatically determine dependencies in all cases ? And the uglyness of search paths in addition to that - or as part of that ... --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
hey guys, I believe discussion went out of control. Everyone's messages were sent, so there is no reason to keep this thread/spam/fight. we all have some real emails to spend time with ;) regards On 6/1/07, Sergei Steshenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The world is full of frustrated people who invented the perfect software building, packaging and distribution systems. Something to think over... Yeti And who said the word perfect ? And how can software building be perfect if there is no limitations on how the sources are generated, and thus no way to automatically determine dependencies in all cases ? And the uglyness of search paths in addition to that - or as part of that ... --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list -- --Antonio Gomes ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- Gian Mario Tagliaretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/5/31, Sergei Steshenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Sergei, I'm telling, I had similar problems as the original poster, and switching to newer 'bash' was the solution. You technical posts are more than welcome on this list, I cannot speak for everybody but I can at least speak for myself. I guess the problem is that posting about AppFromScratch every other day, include all the dependencies all the time, reply to list messages without any polite quoting, that is what annoys people. What is wrong with you ? Believe me, a lot of people on this lists thinks the same about you, don't get me wrong, as I said the technical part of your messages is _REALLY_ welcome but please stop posting only about your app. You can be definition ignore my posts to this list and/or at all. This is not how the netiquette should work. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti FOSS is also about freedom of speech. So, you and others are entitled to have your opinion about what I'm saying, but I will be posting what _I_ think is relevant and necessary. To shut me up develop a better/easier for end user way of building. --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
2007/6/1, Sergei Steshenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FOSS is also about freedom of speech. Thank to God we are still free to have our own opinion, and not only because of FOSS. So, you and others are entitled to have your opinion about what I'm saying, but I will be posting what _I_ think is relevant and necessary. As I thought and wrote earlier you got me wrong, too bad. I and others already explained that no one is trying to shut you up, just to be more polite with the community with your answers, that's all. To shut me up develop a better/easier for end user way of building. Why don't you do that as well instead of writing workarounds to the problem? p.s. if you have some spare time: http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: FOSS is also about freedom of speech. So, you and others are entitled to have your opinion about what I'm saying, but I will be posting what _I_ think is relevant and necessary. As you might or might not notice, no one tried to deprive you of the freedom of speech. The problem is in the form. Do not be surprised if you end up not being listened to, even with all your freedom of speech. (Hm, this would probably weigh more if someone else said it.) To shut me up develop a better/easier for end user way of building. The world is full of frustrated people who invented the perfect software building, packaging and distribution systems. Something to think over... Yeti -- http://gwyddion.net/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:52:02AM +0200, David Ne?as (Yeti) wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: FOSS is also about freedom of speech. So, you and others are entitled to have your opinion about what I'm saying, but I will be posting what _I_ think is relevant and necessary. As you might or might not notice, no one tried to deprive you of the freedom of speech. The problem is in the form. Do not be surprised if you end up not being listened to, even with all your freedom of speech. (Hm, this would probably weigh more if someone else said it.) Forgive me Sergei, but I started deleting your email, on site, quite a while ago. You may wish to Google: shameless self-promotion netiquette Here's an example of what's returned: http://www.passionatepen.com/netiquettearticle.htm - Ana ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:23:57AM +1000, Craig Burtenshaw - Sun Microsystems wrote: I am attempting to installing gtk+ (where I have tried 2.10.12 and 2.9.4), it configures fine with the command - # ./configure --prefix=/usr However when I attempt to 'make' the binaries I get the following at the end. config.status: executing gdk/gdkconfig.h commands config.status: gdk/gdkconfig.h is unchanged echo timestamp stamp-gc-h make all-recursive make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk' Making all in win32 make[4]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32' Making all in rc make[5]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32/rc' gdk.rc gdk-win32-res.o gdk.rc: line 3: GTK_ICON: command not found ... WHY is it trying to execute the gdk.rc file, rather than putting it into /usr/lib/pkgconfig ? Obviously, it executes $(SOME_COMMAND) gdk.rc gdk-win32-res.o where $(SOME_COMMAND) is not defined. Look to the makefiles and config.log to find out what command and why it's undefined. Yeti -- http://gwyddion.net/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
WHY is it trying to execute the gdk.rc file, rather than putting it into /usr/lib/pkgconfig ? Obviously, it executes $(SOME_COMMAND) gdk.rc gdk-win32-res.o where $(SOME_COMMAND) is not defined. Look to the makefiles and config.log to find out what command and why it's undefined. The SOME_COMMAND is WINDRES (which is the Win32 resource compiler), but the Makefile in gdk/win32/rc should want to use that only when USE_WIN32 is defined. Why does the original poster get USE_WIN32 defined even when he is building on Unix? Hmm, or is the problem that for some reason there is no default all target in the generated Makefile before the gdk-win32-res.o target, so make thinks that gdk-win32-res.o is the default target? Was some odd version of automake used to generate the Makefile.in from Makefile.am in this case? --tml ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- Craig Burtenshaw - Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am attempting to installing gtk+ (where I have tried 2.10.12 and 2.9.4),
it configures
fine with the
command - # ./configure --prefix=/usr
However when I attempt to 'make' the binaries I get the following at the
end.
config.status: executing gdk/gdkconfig.h commands
config.status: gdk/gdkconfig.h is unchanged
echo timestamp stamp-gc-h
make all-recursive
make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk'
Making all in win32
make[4]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32'
Making all in rc
make[5]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32/rc'
gdk.rc gdk-win32-res.o
gdk.rc: line 3: GTK_ICON: command not found
gdk.rc: line 5: VS_VERSION_INFO: command not found
gdk.rc: line 6: FILEVERSION: command not found
gdk.rc: line 7: PRODUCTVERSION: command not found
gdk.rc: line 8: FILEFLAGSMASK: command not found
gdk.rc: line 9: FILEFLAGS: command not found
gdk.rc: line 10: FILEOS: command not found
gdk.rc: line 11: FILETYPE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 12: FILESUBTYPE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 13: BEGIN: command not found
gdk.rc: line 14: BLOCK: command not found
gdk.rc: line 15: BEGIN: command not found
gdk.rc: line 16: BLOCK: command not found
gdk.rc: line 17: BEGIN: command not found
gdk.rc: line 18: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 19: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 20: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 21: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 22: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 23: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 24: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 25: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 26: END: command not found
gdk.rc: line 27: END: command not found
gdk.rc: line 28: BLOCK: command not found
gdk.rc: line 29: BEGIN: command not found
gdk.rc: line 30: VALUE: command not found
gdk.rc: line 31: END: command not found
gdk.rc: line 32: END: command not found
make[5]: *** [gdk-win32-res.o] Error 127
make[5]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32/rc'
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12'
make: *** [all] Error 2
WHY is it trying to execute the gdk.rc file, rather than putting it into
/usr/lib/pkgconfig ?
Thank you in advance.
Craig.
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
This might be indicative of too old version of /bin/sh.
FWIW, my latest and greatest version of AppsFromScratch (not the one on the
website)
build bash-3.2.
I now use such a command line:
(\
/home/sergei/AppsFromScratch/20070526/bin/build.pl -make_like -check_with_ldd
-targets_to_build
bash:pkg-config 1build.prerequisites.log 21; \
PATH=/maxtor5/sergei/AppsFromScratchWD/install/pkg-config-0.21/bin:$PATH;
export PATH \
/home/sergei/AppsFromScratch/20070526/bin/build.pl -make_like -check_with_ldd
-sh_exec
/maxtor5/sergei/AppsFromScratchWD/install/bash-3.2/bin/bash -targets_to_build
pidgin
1build.pidgin.log 21\
)
, so prerequisites (bash, pkg-config and friends) are built first.
I had to do this because of similar problems (IIRS).
If you are interested to try AppsFromScratch, please let me know.
It worked to an extent on Sparc Solaris (built gtk+); the beauty of the tool
is that it builds and installs everything locally, not requiring root
permission,
so integrity of your system is preserved.
The sources are downloaded automatically from mirrors as needed.
A command line like the above should suffice ('pidgin' should be replaced with
'gtk+' and that's it).
Regards,
Sergei.
P.S. The list of built OOB targets:
aspell-0.60.4
atk-1.12.1
at-spi-1.6.6
audiofile-0.2.6
autoconf-2.61
autogen-5.8.7
bash-3.0
bash-3.2
bc-1.06
bison-2.3
bzip2-1.0.4
cabextract-1.2
Cairo-1.040
cairo-1.2.6
claws-mail-2.8.1
cups-1.2.10-source
curl-7.15.5
dejagnu-1.4.4
diacanvas2-0.14.4
ecasound-2.4.5
esound-0.2.36
expat-2.0.0
expect-5.44.1
ExtUtils-Depends-0.205
ExtUtils-PkgConfig-1.07
fftw-3.1.2
flac-1.1.2
flex-2.5.33
fontconfig-2.4.1
fontforge-20070312
freetype-2.3.4
gail-1.8.11
gcc-3.4.6
gcc-4.1.2
gcc-4.2.0
GConf-2.14.0
gettext-0.16.1
glade-2.12.1
Glib-1.144
glib-1.2.10
glib-2.12.12
gmp-4.2.1
Gnome2-1.040
Gnome2-Canvas-1.002
Gnome2-Dia-0.04
Gnome2-GConf-1.043
Gnome2-Print-1.000
Gnome2-VFS-1.061
Gnome2-Vte-0.08
Gnome2-Wnck-0.13
gnome-keyring-0.4.9
gnome-vfs-2.14.2
gnupg-2.0.4
gnutls-1.4.5
gperf-3.0.2
gst-plugins-base-0.10.7
GStreamer-0.09
gstreamer-0.10.8
gtk+-1.2.10
gtk+-2.10.12
Gtk2-1.144
Gtk2-GladeXML-1.006
Gtk2-Html2-0.04
Gtk2-TrayIcon-0.04
gtk-engines-2.8.0
gtkspell-2.0.11
guile-1.8.1
icu4c-3_6-src
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
2007/5/30, Sergei Steshenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you are interested to try AppsFromScratch, please let me know. Sergei I beg you, please stop posting every other day the whole dependencies that your great AppFromScratch can compile, please. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- Gian Mario Tagliaretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/5/30, Sergei Steshenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you are interested to try AppsFromScratch, please let me know. Sergei I beg you, please stop posting every other day the whole dependencies that your great AppFromScratch can compile, please. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti It's easier to post the dependencies than to just claim they are compiled. --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:07:55PM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: --- Gian Mario Tagliaretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sergei I beg you, please stop posting every other day the whole dependencies that your great AppFromScratch can compile, please. It's easier to post the dependencies than to just claim they are compiled. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ ^^ The list is present here || and since this URL is also invariantly advertised in every your post, is it really necessary to repeat the information everyone interested can get there? Yeti -- http://gwyddion.net/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- David Neèas (Yeti) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:07:55PM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: --- Gian Mario Tagliaretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sergei I beg you, please stop posting every other day the whole dependencies that your great AppFromScratch can compile, please. It's easier to post the dependencies than to just claim they are compiled. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ ^^ The list is present here || and since this URL is also invariantly advertised in every your post, is it really necessary to repeat the information everyone interested can get there? Yeti -- http://gwyddion.net/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list Just compare the two lists. --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:24:28PM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: Just compare the two lists. I see. Then please at least advertise tools people are able to get. Or make your the new great tools actually available. Advertising `I have something that might help you and here is a long list of thins it can do, but it is not available anywhere' is even more pointless than usually. Yeti -- http://gwyddion.net/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- David Neèas (Yeti) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:24:28PM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: Just compare the two lists. I see. Then please at least advertise tools people are able to get. Or make your the new great tools actually available. Advertising `I have something that might help you and here is a long list of thins it can do, but it is not available anywhere' is even more pointless than usually. Yeti -- http://gwyddion.net/ ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list I prefer to release complete things. For example, I need to update documentation. I also want to restore wxPerl - haven't succeeded with the latest versions, simply did not have enough time. Also, I've made quite a progress with RHEL4 - 64 bits, but not yet everything builds. Some things I know how to fix, some not yet. Anyone who wants latest and greatest from me will get it from me upon request. But as a prerelease software :-). --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
Sergei Steshenko wrote: --- David Neèas (Yeti) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see. Then please at least advertise tools people are able to get. Or make your the new great tools actually available. I prefer to release complete things. For example, I need to update documentation. Regardless of all of that, please stop posting about Apps From Scratch every other day. It's really annoying. Thanks, Andrew ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Re: Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
--- Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sergei Steshenko wrote: --- David Neèas (Yeti) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see. Then please at least advertise tools people are able to get. Or make your the new great tools actually available. I prefer to release complete things. For example, I need to update documentation. Regardless of all of that, please stop posting about Apps From Scratch every other day. It's really annoying. Thanks, Andrew I'm telling, I had similar problems as the original poster, and switching to newer 'bash' was the solution. My original reply contained the order of building, the idea of staged building - first prerequisites, then the rest. The prerequisites are not classical dependencies - because neither 'configure' scripts check their version, nor documentation mentions them. And showed the result of my approach - every of the mentioned targets could be built using the command line I gave. And, actually, all of them using similar (actually, even shorter) command line. What is wrong with you ? You can be definition ignore my posts to this list and/or at all. Regards, Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Installing gtk+2.10.12 issues.
Hi all, I am attempting to installing gtk+ (where I have tried 2.10.12 and 2.9.4), it configures fine with the command - # ./configure --prefix=/usr However when I attempt to 'make' the binaries I get the following at the end. config.status: executing gdk/gdkconfig.h commands config.status: gdk/gdkconfig.h is unchanged echo timestamp stamp-gc-h make all-recursive make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk' Making all in win32 make[4]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32' Making all in rc make[5]: Entering directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32/rc' gdk.rc gdk-win32-res.o gdk.rc: line 3: GTK_ICON: command not found gdk.rc: line 5: VS_VERSION_INFO: command not found gdk.rc: line 6: FILEVERSION: command not found gdk.rc: line 7: PRODUCTVERSION: command not found gdk.rc: line 8: FILEFLAGSMASK: command not found gdk.rc: line 9: FILEFLAGS: command not found gdk.rc: line 10: FILEOS: command not found gdk.rc: line 11: FILETYPE: command not found gdk.rc: line 12: FILESUBTYPE: command not found gdk.rc: line 13: BEGIN: command not found gdk.rc: line 14: BLOCK: command not found gdk.rc: line 15: BEGIN: command not found gdk.rc: line 16: BLOCK: command not found gdk.rc: line 17: BEGIN: command not found gdk.rc: line 18: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 19: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 20: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 21: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 22: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 23: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 24: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 25: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 26: END: command not found gdk.rc: line 27: END: command not found gdk.rc: line 28: BLOCK: command not found gdk.rc: line 29: BEGIN: command not found gdk.rc: line 30: VALUE: command not found gdk.rc: line 31: END: command not found gdk.rc: line 32: END: command not found make[5]: *** [gdk-win32-res.o] Error 127 make[5]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32/rc' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk/win32' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12/gdk' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/gtk+-2.10.12' make: *** [all] Error 2 WHY is it trying to execute the gdk.rc file, rather than putting it into /usr/lib/pkgconfig ? Thank you in advance. Craig. ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
