Re: API-Reference is missing
On 2019-02-14 10:39, Daniel Boles via gtkmm-list wrote: Btw, if anyone in this latest thread doesn't know yet, you can substitute 3.20 into the URLs for documentation pointing at 3.22/3.24/stable and usually set something that's *almost* relevant, although 3.20 is increasingly old. Failing that, hopefully your package manage installed the documentation into /usr/share/doc alongside the main package, or has a separate doc package available. Third possibility: Download a tarball (.tar.xz file) from https://download.gnome.org/sources/, expand it, and read the documentation, starting at docs/reference/html/index.html. On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 04:23, Compro Prasad via gtkmm-list mailto:gtkmm-list@gnome.org>> wrote: I am also frustrated with the documentation available for gtkmm. I have to instead look into gtk docs and try to guess the equivalent gtkmm code. If possible I could also help in doing anything necessary or automating the whole process document generation. Documentation *is* largely generated, and usually people complain about that instead because the generation (A) is inherently limited because not every C concept can be 100% accurately transformed to a C++ wrapping mechanistically and/or (B) said automation doesn't have all the features that it in theory could (but which I don't see Merge Requests for! ...yes, including from myself.) I presume you've seen the gtkmm tutorial (in the gtkmm-documentation project). If there are specific things you are frustrated with, then you can submit an Issue or - better - Merge Request on GitLab to request or add examples for that. Otherwise, it's unclear what you want fixed, or where you think *more* automation could help (rather than hinder), so general frustrations don't really provide an indication of what could be improved. ___ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
Re: API-Reference is missing
Btw, if anyone in this latest thread doesn't know yet, you can substitute 3.20 into the URLs for documentation pointing at 3.22/3.24/stable and usually set something that's *almost* relevant, although 3.20 is increasingly old. Failing that, hopefully your package manage installed the documentation into /usr/share/doc alongside the main package, or has a separate doc package available. On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 04:23, Compro Prasad via gtkmm-list < gtkmm-list@gnome.org> wrote: > I am also frustrated with the documentation available for gtkmm. I > have to instead look into gtk docs and try to guess the equivalent > gtkmm code. If possible I could also help in doing anything necessary > or automating the whole process document generation. > Documentation *is* largely generated, and usually people complain about that instead because the generation (A) is inherently limited because not every C concept can be 100% accurately transformed to a C++ wrapping mechanistically and/or (B) said automation doesn't have all the features that it in theory could (but which I don't see Merge Requests for! ...yes, including from myself.) I presume you've seen the gtkmm tutorial (in the gtkmm-documentation project). If there are specific things you are frustrated with, then you can submit an Issue or - better - Merge Request on GitLab to request or add examples for that. Otherwise, it's unclear what you want fixed, or where you think *more* automation could help (rather than hinder), so general frustrations don't really provide an indication of what could be improved. ___ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
Re: API-Reference is missing
I am also frustrated with the documentation available for gtkmm. I have to instead look into gtk docs and try to guess the equivalent gtkmm code. If possible I could also help in doing anything necessary or automating the whole process document generation. Regards, Compro On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:23 PM Kasper Peeters wrote: > > > This is already reported at > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/library-web/issues/12 (among > > 10s of other duplicates in an issue list that it seems no one is > > maintaining) > > What is most worrying is that it seems to be next to impossible to > reach anyone responsible for the GNOME web sites. Are there simply no > GNOME people left anymore except for a few people who organise the > occasional hackfest and do not care about getting anyone else on board? > > Cheers, > Kasper > ___ > gtkmm-list mailing list > gtkmm-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list ___ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
Re: API-Reference is missing
> This is already reported at > https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/library-web/issues/12 (among > 10s of other duplicates in an issue list that it seems no one is > maintaining) What is most worrying is that it seems to be next to impossible to reach anyone responsible for the GNOME web sites. Are there simply no GNOME people left anymore except for a few people who organise the occasional hackfest and do not care about getting anyone else on board? Cheers, Kasper ___ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
Re: API-Reference is missing
This is already reported at https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/library-web/issues/12 (among 10s of other duplicates in an issue list that it seems no one is maintaining) ___ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
