Re: GNU Guix maintainer collective expands

2019-10-05 Thread Konrad Hinsen

Am 05.10.19 um 14:46 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:


Ricardo Wurmus and I are thrilled to announce that Marius Bakke, Maxim
Cournoyer, and Tobias Geerinckx-Rice are joining us in maintaining Guix!


That's good news and an excellent opportunity to thank everyone working 
hard on Guix, which means in particular the current and future maintainers!


Konrad.



Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-05 Thread Dimakakos Dimos


Thanks for all the motivation everyone, I've started working on it so
I'll start thread later or tomorrow with the progress I've done and any
questions that occur to me.





Re: GNU Guix maintainer collective expands

2019-10-05 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:46:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
> 
> Ricardo Wurmus and I are thrilled to announce that Marius Bakke, Maxim
> Cournoyer, and Tobias Geerinckx-Rice are joining us in maintaining Guix!
> Read more about this change and about maintaining Guix at:
> 
>   https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/gnu-guix-maintainer-collective-expands/
> 
> This is probably an opportunity to think about ways in which we can
> improve our processes, and everyone’s input is very much welcome!
> 
> Big thanks and a warm welcome to you Marius, Maxim, and Tobias!

Absolutely! 

Be great if each of you can present a vision at the GNU Guix days of
where you want to be by the end of 2020. GNU Guix will only get
bigger, so let's aim high!

Pj.




GNU Guix maintainer collective expands

2019-10-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Guix!

Ricardo Wurmus and I are thrilled to announce that Marius Bakke, Maxim
Cournoyer, and Tobias Geerinckx-Rice are joining us in maintaining Guix!
Read more about this change and about maintaining Guix at:

  https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/gnu-guix-maintainer-collective-expands/

This is probably an opportunity to think about ways in which we can
improve our processes, and everyone’s input is very much welcome!

Big thanks and a warm welcome to you Marius, Maxim, and Tobias!

Ludo’.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-05 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Gábor Boskovits writes:

> Hello,
>
> Dimakakos Dimos  ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 5.,
> Szo 0:57):
>
>>
>> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>>
>> > I think nobody has written a Racket importer.  I have it as a
>> > longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the
>> > time... despite the fact that I desperately want the feature.
>>
>> I could start working on this, starting tomorrow. I will need a bit of
>> guidance though, shall I open a new thread or use this one?
>>
> Thanks for taking the initiative here. I would start a new thread, as this
> is misleadingly titled right now, and add
> please add a summary about the current status, so interested parties can
> get involved more easily. Thanks.

+1!  And please Cc me on it!

I may have a few good example packages to start testing it against and
can provide the (very limited) amount of info I know.




Re: New outreachy participant introduction

2019-10-05 Thread Gábor Boskovits
>
> Hello Nardos,

How did the installation go?

Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. We are
here to help.


>> Best regards,
> g_bor
>
> --
> OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
>


Re: Racket packages: formerly Move DrRacket to a separate output?

2019-10-05 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello,

Dimakakos Dimos  ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 5.,
Szo 0:57):

>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>
> > I think nobody has written a Racket importer.  I have it as a
> > longstanding background TODO task but clearly haven't found the
> > time... despite the fact that I desperately want the feature.
>
> I could start working on this, starting tomorrow. I will need a bit of
> guidance though, shall I open a new thread or use this one?
>
Thanks for taking the initiative here. I would start a new thread, as this
is misleadingly titled right now, and add
please add a summary about the current status, so interested parties can
get involved more easily. Thanks.

Best regards,
g_bor

>
>
>
>