Re: Temporarily unavailable for hacking on guix
[removed -security@ from CC, since we're all on -devel as well] Maxime, Maxime Devos 写道： TL;DR: I won't be available for a while, so please remove me from guix-security and http://guix.gnu.org/en/security/ and don't expect replies on existing issues. Done and done. Good luck fixing your computer! I look forward to welcoming you back, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Temporarily unavailable for hacking on guix
Hi guix, TL;DR: I won't be available for a while, so please remove me from guix-security and http://guix.gnu.org/en/security/ and don't expect replies on existing issues. The computer I usually use (where the usual gpg, e-mail, git, IRC, guix itself ... is all set-up) (no worries, there are back-ups) is somewhat broken (hardware, not software). It should be relatively easy to fix, but I'll probably be taking my sweet time to actually fix it. Greetings, Maxime.
Test parallelism with CMake
Guix, As I read the source, cmake-build-system should by default both build and check with parallelism enabled. When I locally build a package only the build phase runs with parallelism and tests are being run in serial. When I run a manual build (stopping an in-process build run with '-K', then removing all files under the build directory, then copying and running the commands from the stopped build) I do not see a parallel build, nor do I see any parallelism passed by command or environment arguments (no '-j' or CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL). If this has been previously discussed please direct me to the earlier discussion. Often my builds are fast (running in parallel) but tests are slow (running in serial) and I am puzzled why any of this works the way it does. Greg
Re: EXWM
Hi André, > I remember, back in the day, to what great lengths I went to understand > what the hell what going on. I had EXWM configured in my Emacs init.el > file (the sane, standard and documented way of doing it), and I've used > it before in other distros. Just to clarify, I have exwm configured in my ~/.emacs, and it works. I don't have any ~/.exwm file. The way Guix currently starts exwm does not require to you have a ~/.exwm. So, Guix does support the standard way of configuring exwm. Do we agree on this? Regards, Arun signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: EXWM
Hi Janneke, >> I was involved in the packaging of exwm when it was first done, and I >> hear your frustration. :-) Please do send patches (with me on Cc) >> addressing the issue, and we can continue our discussion there. > > As someone who didn't have a prior EXWM setup in their .emacs, I have > been enjoying the separate .exwm config file. Ah, I see. That may be good reason to not break this separation between .emacs and .exwm. > I'm wondering, how have you managed to switch off exwm when running a > nested emacs or a console emacs? I myself have never run a nested emacs or a console emacs session. So, I have never encountered this problem. Cheers! Arun signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: EXWM
Arun Isaac writes: Hello, > I was involved in the packaging of exwm when it was first done, and I > hear your frustration. :-) Please do send patches (with me on Cc) > addressing the issue, and we can continue our discussion there. As someone who didn't have a prior EXWM setup in their .emacs, I have been enjoying the separate .exwm config file. I'm wondering, how have you managed to switch off exwm when running a nested emacs or a console emacs? Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
Re: EXWM
Hi André, I was involved in the packaging of exwm when it was first done, and I hear your frustration. :-) Please do send patches (with me on Cc) addressing the issue, and we can continue our discussion there. Thank you, Arun signature.asc Description: PGP signature
