Re: (Lx)Qt team in Guix
Hello, 宋文武 writes: [...] > Hello, I have just pushed 2 commits to remove qt.scm from the scope of > lxqt and add myself to the qt team. > > Happy weekend! Yay! Thank you, and happy weekend to you as well! -- Thanks, Maxim
Re: (Lx)Qt team in Guix
Hi, On Fri, 08 Mar 2024 19:05:57 +0800, Andreas Enge wrote: > > Hello, > > Am Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 08:46:12PM -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > > I think the reason qt.scm is part of the lxqt team is historical; lxqt-team > > predates qt-team. We should probably just remove qt.scm from > > lxqt-team's scope. What do you think? > > > > I'd keep both team separated; I'm interested in maintaining qt upgrades > > but not much lxqt. > > that sounds good to me as well; and I would then encourage 宋文武 and > Hilton to join the Qt team, too. I don't know about Qt... My existing commits to qt.scm are all fixes to package definitions, so joining the Qt team doesn't sound suitable. Thanks
Re: (Lx)Qt team in Guix
Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hi Andreas, > > +guix-devel > > Andreas Enge writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I am reaching out since I am receiving in cc patches for Qt, and realise >> that I do not feel quite confident about them; I added myself because I >> feel able to work on C code, but I think you are much more involved and >> competent for Qt than I and also sufficiently numerous, so I could safely >> remove myself. >> >> But when trying to do so, I realised that the situation is a bit convoluted: >> In addition to a qt team, there is an lxqt team, and I was actually part >> only of the latter; but the two overlap in claiming responsibility for >> gnu/packages/qt.scm. Moreover Maxim is part of qt, and 宋文武 and I are >> part of lxqt. > > I think the reason qt.scm is part of the lxqt team is historical; lxqt-team > predates qt-team. We should probably just remove qt.scm from > lxqt-team's scope. What do you think? > >> So I would suggest to sort this out somehow; maybe merge lxqt into qt? > > I'd keep both team separated; I'm interested in maintaining qt upgrades > but not much lxqt. Hello, I have just pushed 2 commits to remove qt.scm from the scope of lxqt and add myself to the qt team. Happy weekend!
Re: (Lx)Qt team in Guix
Hello, Am Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 08:46:12PM -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > I think the reason qt.scm is part of the lxqt team is historical; lxqt-team > predates qt-team. We should probably just remove qt.scm from > lxqt-team's scope. What do you think? > > I'd keep both team separated; I'm interested in maintaining qt upgrades > but not much lxqt. that sounds good to me as well; and I would then encourage 宋文武 and Hilton to join the Qt team, too. Andreas
Re: (Lx)Qt team in Guix
Hi Andreas, +guix-devel Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > I am reaching out since I am receiving in cc patches for Qt, and realise > that I do not feel quite confident about them; I added myself because I > feel able to work on C code, but I think you are much more involved and > competent for Qt than I and also sufficiently numerous, so I could safely > remove myself. > > But when trying to do so, I realised that the situation is a bit convoluted: > In addition to a qt team, there is an lxqt team, and I was actually part > only of the latter; but the two overlap in claiming responsibility for > gnu/packages/qt.scm. Moreover Maxim is part of qt, and 宋文武 and I are > part of lxqt. I think the reason qt.scm is part of the lxqt team is historical; lxqt-team predates qt-team. We should probably just remove qt.scm from lxqt-team's scope. What do you think? > So I would suggest to sort this out somehow; maybe merge lxqt into qt? I'd keep both team separated; I'm interested in maintaining qt upgrades but not much lxqt. -- Thanks, Maxim
