Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4.
Hi Marius, Mark, > Only packages with a large impact in terms of rebuilds (as calculated by > `guix refresh -l `). Obviously gcc is one such package. > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html Thanks! That is exactly the information I was looking for. > Most changes go to 'master' first and are later merged into > 'core-updates'. However, changes that would force a large number of > rebuilds need to be pushed to another branch, to allow our build farm to > rebuild before its merged to 'master'. Understood, makes a lot of sense. > If you are porting to a new architecture, I would definitely recommend > basing your work on 'core-updates', which will likely be merged into > 'master' in the next two weeks. If you need gcc-4.9.4, that's another > reason to base your work on 'core-updates'. I am (I think) almost there, I expect to be able to succesfully build hello on my ppc machine soon (it's a slow machine, so iterations take time). I do not feel like changing to core-updates now (though I would have been better had I worked there since the beggining). Once I have bootstrapped, I will review the changes and rebase the "core" ones to core-updates. I should be there before two weeks' time. Thanks! Carlos
Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4.
csanchez...@gmail.com (Carlos Sánchez de La Lama) writes: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:51:53AM +0200, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: >>> gcc-4.9.3 has a bug in long double isinf builtin on PowerPC, which >>> affects glibc versions >= 2.23. >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 >>> >>> * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcc-4.9): Update to 4.9.4. >> >> Is this different from what we have on core-updates? >> >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gcc.scm?h=core-updates#n339 > > Not at all. I am not tracking core-updates, so I had missed that. I > will check there in the future. Sorry about that. > > BTW, is there described somewhere which kind of updates go to > core-updates first? Does everything go first to core-updates? Most changes go to 'master' first and are later merged into 'core-updates'. However, changes that would force a large number of rebuilds need to be pushed to another branch, to allow our build farm to rebuild before its merged to 'master'. 'gcc-4.9' is our default compiler, so it would force a rebuild of _everything_. Changes like that are precisely what 'core-updates' is for. > I am trying to understand to decide on whether I should use cote-updates > as a basis for my contributions instead of master. If you are porting to a new architecture, I would definitely recommend basing your work on 'core-updates', which will likely be merged into 'master' in the next two weeks. If you need gcc-4.9.4, that's another reason to base your work on 'core-updates'. Thanks for your efforts! Mark
Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4.
Carlos Sánchez de La Lamawrites: > > BTW, is there described somewhere which kind of updates go to > core-updates first? Does everything go first to core-updates? Only packages with a large impact in terms of rebuilds (as calculated by `guix refresh -l `). Obviously gcc is one such package. Soon there will also be a "staging" branch for packages with a lesser impact, but still large enough that it's worth building and testing them on Hydra before merging to master. See this post for more information: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4.
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:51:53AM +0200, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: >> gcc-4.9.3 has a bug in long double isinf builtin on PowerPC, which >> affects glibc versions >= 2.23. >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 >> >> * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcc-4.9): Update to 4.9.4. > > Is this different from what we have on core-updates? > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gcc.scm?h=core-updates#n339 Not at all. I am not tracking core-updates, so I had missed that. I will check there in the future. Sorry about that. BTW, is there described somewhere which kind of updates go to core-updates first? Does everything go first to core-updates? I am trying to understand to decide on whether I should use cote-updates as a basis for my contributions instead of master. Thanks! Carlos
Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:51:53AM +0200, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: > gcc-4.9.3 has a bug in long double isinf builtin on PowerPC, which > affects glibc versions >= 2.23. > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 > > * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcc-4.9): Update to 4.9.4. Is this different from what we have on core-updates? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gcc.scm?h=core-updates#n339