Re: Ext4 corruption in some stable kernels
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:30:10AM +0800, Hilton Chain wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:13:58 +0800, > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > > Everyone with commit privileges should feel free to push these patches to > > master if they seem okay. I won't be able to help today. > > > OK, I have applied "[PATCH 2/8] gnu: linux-libre 6.1: Update to 6.1.66." from > #67724 as 65334547674bdaeb75eb37ffbe23ba6f9fd486b1 and pushed. Thank you for this and the subsequent update! I'm preparing to push the remainder now.
Re: Ext4 corruption in some stable kernels
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:13:58 +0800, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Everyone with commit privileges should feel free to push these patches to > master if they seem okay. I won't be able to help today. OK, I have applied "[PATCH 2/8] gnu: linux-libre 6.1: Update to 6.1.66." from #67724 as 65334547674bdaeb75eb37ffbe23ba6f9fd486b1 and pushed.
Re: Ext4 corruption in some stable kernels
Everyone with commit privileges should feel free to push these patches to master if they seem okay. I won't be able to help today. Leo On Sun, Dec 10, 2023, at 00:35, Hilton Chain wrote: > Hi Felix (and Leo, Cc-ed) > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:00:47 +0800, > Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System > distribution. wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It's possible Guix never shipped the affected "stable" kernels, but a brief >> pointer seemed appropriate. For details, please see here. [1] >> >> Kind regards >> Felix >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231205122122.dfhhoaswsfscuhc3@quack3/ >> > > From the linked thread and report in Debian[1], 6.1.64 (and maybe 5.10.202 + > 5.15.140) are affected. Unfortunately we have shipped them for about 1 week. > > Leo has sent #67724 yesterday to update kernels, maybe we can merge updates > for > these three versions quicker? > > Thanks > --- > [1]: https://micronews.debian.org/2023/1702150551.html
Re: Ext4 corruption in some stable kernels
Hi, On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 13:35:30 +0800, Hilton Chain wrote: > > Hi Felix (and Leo, Cc-ed) > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:00:47 +0800, > Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > It's possible Guix never shipped the affected "stable" kernels, but a brief > > pointer seemed appropriate. For details, please see here. [1] > > > > Kind regards > > Felix > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231205122122.dfhhoaswsfscuhc3@quack3/ > > > > From the linked thread and report in Debian[1], 6.1.64 (and maybe 5.10.202 + > 5.15.140) are affected. Unfortunately we have shipped them for about 1 week. > > Leo has sent #67724 yesterday to update kernels, maybe we can merge updates > for these three versions quicker? > > Thanks > --- > [1]: https://micronews.debian.org/2023/1702150551.html Based on the commit log and [1], the offending commit was not actually included in 5.10.y and 5.15.y releases. And according to [2], a fix has benn added[3] to v6.1.66, so only v6.1.64 and v6.1.65 are affected. Thanks --- [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/2023112502-supernova-copier-7615@gregkh/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/2023120643-evade-legal-ee74@gregkh/ [3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.1.66=ea574927fc0bc343016ea3337fcfc0b3fb26fe08
Re: Ext4 corruption in some stable kernels
Hi Felix (and Leo, Cc-ed) On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:00:47 +0800, Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. wrote: > > Hi, > > It's possible Guix never shipped the affected "stable" kernels, but a brief > pointer seemed appropriate. For details, please see here. [1] > > Kind regards > Felix > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231205122122.dfhhoaswsfscuhc3@quack3/ > From the linked thread and report in Debian[1], 6.1.64 (and maybe 5.10.202 + 5.15.140) are affected. Unfortunately we have shipped them for about 1 week. Leo has sent #67724 yesterday to update kernels, maybe we can merge updates for these three versions quicker? Thanks --- [1]: https://micronews.debian.org/2023/1702150551.html
