Re: GNOME minimal
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Looks like a bug in our gnome-keyring package definition. > Could you file this issue at bug-g...@gnu.org? Done. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41789 -- Alexey
Re: GNOME minimal
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > The definition below builds in a system, I haven't tried booting it yet: Just tried it, it works! But Evince remains pulled in, I suspect because of gnome-default-applications. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: GNOME minimal
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > A lighter system has the benefits of: > > - being easier on Internet bandwidth, > - updating faster. And obviously lighter and disk space! ;) -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: GNOME minimal
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Alexey Abramov writes: > >> Do you consider gnome-keyring to be a part of gnome-minimal? > > I would say yes, but that's debatable of course :p > >> If you do, gcr - gnome keyring prompter should also be added. > > Are you saying the gnome-keyring won't work without gcr? Why? I think it will, with some low level stuff, but I couldn't use it or even unlock it. Maybe there are other SystemPromters out there. --8<---cut here---start->8--- May 31 20:32:02 localhost gnome-keyring-daemon[2992]: couldn't create system prompt: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.keyring.SystemPrompter was not provided by any .service files May 31 20:32:24 localhost gnome-keyring-daemon[2992]: couldn't create system prompt: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.keyring.SystemPrompter was not provided by any .service files May 31 20:42:19 localhost gnome-keyring-daemon[2992]: couldn't create system prompt: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.keyring.SystemPrompter was not provided by any .service files --8<---cut here---end--->8--- -- Alexey
Re: GNOME minimal
Hi Pierre, Do you consider gnome-keyring to be a part of gnome-minimal? If you do, gcr - gnome keyring prompter should also be added. -- Alexey
Re: GNOME minimal
Thanks, Tobias! The definition below builds in a system, I haven't tried booting it yet: --8<---cut here---start->8--- (define-public gnome-minimal (package (inherit gnome) (name "gnome-minimal") (propagated-inputs ;; Keep nautilus. (fold alist-delete (package-propagated-inputs gnome) '(;; GNOME-Core-Shell "gnome-backgrounds" "gnome-themes-extra" "gnome-getting-started-docs" "gnome-user-docs" ;; GNOME-Core-Utilities "baobab" "cheese" "eog" "epiphany" "evince" ; REVIEW: Keep for gnome-default-applications? "file-roller" "gedit" "gnome-boxes" "gnome-calculator" "gnome-calendar" "gnome-characters" "gnome-clocks" "gnome-contacts" "gnome-disk-utility" "gnome-font-viewer" "gnome-maps" ;; "gnome-music" ;; "gnome-photos" "gnome-screenshot" ;; "gnome-system-monitor" ; Needed for gnome-polkit-settings "gnome-terminal" "gnome-weather" "simple-scan" "totem" ;; Others "gnome-online-accounts") --8<---cut here---end--->8--- It saves close to 500 MiB in the closure size! Not bad :) -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: GNOME minimal
Jonathan Brielmaier 写道： So this is basically a plain Gnome shell withouth any programms? What is the use-case for it? s/without any programmes/with the programmes you actually choose to install/ ‘gnome-desktop’ is a maximal beast, and is only going to get more so as Raghav's work progresses. I don't think Guix should ship a ‘gnome-minimal’ package (nor am I fiercely opposed), but it makes sense to modify things like gnome-polkit-settings to handle only keys that are actually present and ignore #f. I presume that's what Pierre is doing right now; we'll see :-) Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: GNOME minimal
Pierre,
Pierre Neidhardt 写道：
guix/ui.scm:1945:12: In procedure run-guix-command:
Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching
pattern" #f)'.
--8<---cut
here---end--->8---
Any idea?
My immediate thought is: #f is what (assoc-ref l
"non-existent-thing") returns.
And indeed:
(define (gnome-polkit-settings config)
"Return the list of GNOME dependencies that provide polkit
actions and
rules."
(let ((gnome (gnome-package config)))
(map (lambda (name)
((package-direct-input-selector name) gnome))
'("gnome-settings-daemon"
"gnome-control-center"
"gnome-system-monitor"
"gvfs"
You need to include gnome-system-monitor, or adjust the service
too.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: GNOME minimal
On 09.06.20 14:21, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've defined a minimal GNOME this way:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (define-public gnome-minimal
> (package
> (inherit gnome)
> (name "gnome-minimal")
> (propagated-inputs
> ;; Keep nautilus.
> (fold alist-delete (package-propagated-inputs gnome)
>'("baobab"
> "cheese"
> "eog"
> "epiphany"
> "evince"
> "file-roller"
> "gedit"
> "gnome-boxes"
> "gnome-calculator"
> "gnome-calendar"
> "gnome-characters"
> "gnome-clocks"
> "gnome-contacts"
> "gnome-disk-utility"
> "gnome-font-viewer"
> "gnome-maps"
> ;; "gnome-music"
> ;; "gnome-photos"
> "gnome-screenshot"
> "gnome-system-monitor"
> "gnome-terminal"
> "gnome-weather"
> "simple-scan"
> "totem")
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
So this is basically a plain Gnome shell withouth any programms? What is
the use-case for it?
