Re: Video license
Hello, Björn Höfling ezt írta (időpont: 2019. jún. 26., Sze 23:21): > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:40:35 -0300 > Laura Lazzati wrote: > > > Have just pushed the README file and deleted environment.sh (it's no > > longer needed). > > Thanks. I reformated the README with line-breaks at character 80, then > added a license section and the CC-BY-SA-4.0 International license as a > text file. > > Björn > Thanks for taking care of that. Best regards, g_bor >
Re: Video license
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:40:35 -0300 Laura Lazzati wrote: > Have just pushed the README file and deleted environment.sh (it's no > longer needed). Thanks. I reformated the README with line-breaks at character 80, then added a license section and the CC-BY-SA-4.0 International license as a text file. Björn pgpdPv0uRWgiP.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Video license
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:58:20 -0300 Laura Lazzati wrote: > Thank you, great work. I believe Ricardo should also appear in the > Makefile. Done. Björn pgpNnJqhbOPGu.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Video license
Hi all :) Have just pushed the README file and deleted environment.sh (it's no longer needed). Regards! Laura
Re: Video license
Hi Bruno :) > To assign copyright to people and years, I used the git log plus > knowledge about the work of Laura and Ricardo. Please add/correct if > something is missing or wrong. > Thank you, great work. I believe Ricardo should also appear in the Makefile. > > I wanted to put all "artistic" work under the CC-license, but wasn't > sure how to do it right. > Me neither, I used the license for my blog, but it is something different. > > I will work on that over the week. If you are faster, don't hesitate to > work on it. > I can work on improving the README these days. Alles gute, Laura
Re: Video license
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:41:27 -0300 Laura Lazzati wrote: > Hi!! > > Shall we define this so that we upload the videos :)? > > Regards :) > Laura Hi Laura, I pushed a commit to guix-video that added a COPYING file with the GPL v3 and added copyright/license headers to all source code files. To assign copyright to people and years, I used the git log plus knowledge about the work of Laura and Ricardo. Please add/correct if something is missing or wrong. I wanted to put all "artistic" work under the CC-license, but wasn't sure how to do it right. Is it enough to mention the license in the README? Or do we need to explicitly enumerate all files (mp3, slides, text transcripts)? I noticed that README would also need a bit clean-up then. I will work on that over the week. If you are faster, don't hesitate to work on it. Finally, I noticed we have some .ttf-files and I wanted to check if they are all free and what there license status is. Björn pgpZMUhefnww9.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Video license
Hi!! Shall we define this so that we upload the videos :)? Regards :) Laura
Re: Video license
Hello, Björn Höfling ezt írta (időpont: 2019. jún. 14., P, 9:44): > Hi Gábor, > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:12:14 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > iirc this license discussion came about earlier, please have a look > > at that also. > > There were some problems regarding license compatibility. Otherwise I > > ageree. > > I can't find the older discussions. Which are the problems regarding > license compatibility you see here? > > Unfortunately I can't find it either, but I remember that this discussed. Sorry about not being able to come up with more details. The two things that came up was: 1. the manual is under GNU FDL, but as long as the videos are not considered deriving from the manual, this should not be a problem. 2. can the videos have a separate license from the code that they are critically dependent on? - believe yes. So all in all, I believe that the license choices you made make sense, and iirc I proposed exactly the same set of licenses on that older thread, which I will try to find. It is well possible that it was discussed on irc. I would like to see this fixed soon, the idea of having source code in > Guix' repositories that is only open-sourced but not free software > annoys me. > > Björn > Yes, I agree, it would be great to fix this soon. Best regards, g_bor -- OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
Re: Video license
Hi Gábor, On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:12:14 +0200 Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Hello, > > iirc this license discussion came about earlier, please have a look > at that also. > There were some problems regarding license compatibility. Otherwise I > ageree. I can't find the older discussions. Which are the problems regarding license compatibility you see here? I would like to see this fixed soon, the idea of having source code in Guix' repositories that is only open-sourced but not free software annoys me. Björn pgpgo8MfpLsNz.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Video license
Björn Höfling writes: > On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:29:26 +0100 > Paul Garlick wrote: > >> Hello Björn, >> >> > For the code I would suggest GPL v3+, for the voices (currently >> > Paul) and videos I would suggest CC-BY-SA 4.0 >> > >> > What do you think? Does every contributor agree to that? >> >> That looks good to me. >> >> For the source code we could add copyright statements at the top of >> the files in a similar way to the rest of the Guix code. > > Fine. I will do that. But I would like to see the agreement of the > other contributors. Ricardo, Laura, Gábor: Do you also agree on that? Any free license is fine by me. I don’t know what license compatibility issues Gábor anticipates. -- Ricardo
Re: Video license
Hello, iirc this license discussion came about earlier, please have a look at that also. There were some problems regarding license compatibility. Otherwise I ageree. Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2019. jún. 12., Sze 0:56): > Hi :) > > Fine. I will do that. But I would like to see the agreement of the >> other contributors. Ricardo, Laura, Gábor: Do you also agree on that? >> > Sorry, I agree. > > Regards :) > Laura > g_bor >
Re: Video license
Hi :) Fine. I will do that. But I would like to see the agreement of the > other contributors. Ricardo, Laura, Gábor: Do you also agree on that? > Sorry, I agree. Regards :) Laura
Re: Video license
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:29:26 +0100 Paul Garlick wrote: > Hello Björn, > > > For the code I would suggest GPL v3+, for the voices (currently > > Paul) and videos I would suggest CC-BY-SA 4.0 > > > > What do you think? Does every contributor agree to that? > > That looks good to me. > > For the source code we could add copyright statements at the top of > the files in a similar way to the rest of the Guix code. Fine. I will do that. But I would like to see the agreement of the other contributors. Ricardo, Laura, Gábor: Do you also agree on that? Björn pgpGxLDS_ywCr.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Video license
Hello Björn, > For the code I would suggest GPL v3+, for the voices (currently Paul) > and videos I would suggest CC-BY-SA 4.0 > > What do you think? Does every contributor agree to that? That looks good to me. For the source code we could add copyright statements at the top of the files in a similar way to the rest of the Guix code. Also, would you like to take a look at the CREDITS file and add entries for the work that you have done?. The idea is twofold: to acknowledge the contributions made and also to make the steps more visible. Potential future contributors could then say ' hey, I could do that in my language'. Best regards, Paul.
Video license
Hello, while looking at the videos and the video-repository, I noticed that we don't have any license attached to neither the videos nor the sources. I think we should really add one. For the code I would suggest GPL v3+, for the voices (currently Paul) and videos I would suggest CC-BY-SA 4.0 [0]. What do you think? Does every contributor agree to that? Björn [0] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ pgpz9KAqbYAZ8.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
