Re: [h-cost] RE: Things to do in DC [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2007-06-12 Thread AnnBWass
 
In a message dated 6/11/2007 11:30:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

on  any
really good fabric shops there, 


In addition to G Street Fabrics (you can get to the Rockville store via  
Metro), this store is downtown.  I was wondering if it was still there, but  
the 
website looks up to date:
 
Exquisite Fabrics  _http://www.exqfabrics.com/_ (http://www.exqfabrics.com/) 
 
Ann Wass



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


RE: [h-cost] Women in Art. OT- a little

2007-06-12 Thread Jennifer Byrne
How charming!  Thanks for pointing it out.

Jenn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Saragrace Knauf
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:57 PM
To: h-costume; GermanRenCostume; TheRenaissanceTailor; thefrazzledfrau
Subject: [h-cost] Women in Art. OT- a little

This is pretty cool, and while it may be OT, we will all recognize some of
the paintings!

less than 3 minutes  about:blank
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUDIoN-_Hxs
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


RE: [h-cost] RE: Things to do in DC

2007-06-12 Thread Suzi Clarke

At 04:28 12/06/2007, you wrote:

I have stayed at the Harrington. Not elegant, but clean and reasonable, in a
great location.

Kim

http://www.hotel-harrington.com/


I second the Harrington. We stayed there last year on recommendation 
from this list, and it is within walking distance of everywhere we 
wanted to go on a short trip.


Suzi


I will be in Washington DC with my husband for two and a half days in late
July.
The exhibitions so far described sound interesting, especially the one on
Red at the Textile Museum and the Italian Renaissance and Baroque Women
Painters

I hope they will still be on, and I would also be grateful for advice on any
really good fabric shops there, though if I remember right this was
discussed not long ago and there wasn't much.

Can any one also recommend (off-list since it isn't topical) a good,
reasonably priced hotel which is fairly central to the Smithsonian musuems?

I'm really looking forward to this - it will be the first time we have been
to Washington except for a stopover at the airport (which doesn't count :-)

Annette Wilson
in wintery Canberra, Australia


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Town Crier

2007-06-12 Thread Lynn Downward

There is also a town crier competition, in Benicia, California, I
believe. You may want to google that competition to see what has been
in the contest previously.
LynnD

On 6/11/07, Suzi Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

At 17:28 11/06/2007, you wrote:
I have a friend who wants me to make him a costume for an  American colonial
Town Crier. He says he's seen an illustration with the  Crier in,
judging from
what he describes, as an English Smock. Would this  be so? Of course I want
him in a coat and waistcoat [even if the smock is  correct, I still
have to do
breeches and a shirt]. He may just not want to fool  with a coat [It's
hot.]. I wondered if the Crier was some kind of city  official...like with a
uniform or something to indicate his office. I suppose  that might
depend on the
town.

Any thoughts and/or directions on research would be greatly  appreciated.

If you Google Town Crier, (Images) you will find a number if pictures
of Town Criers, all in pseudo 18th century gear. This is what I
remember from my childhood in Stratford on Avon. See also Beadle,
who was a similar status official.

Suzi

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] Edwardian Straight Front Theory

2007-06-12 Thread Kishan Maynard - Clarke
Hi, first time poster. Firstly thank you for having a place where there is alot 
of knowledge and willingness to help.
   
  I recently started corsetry around three months ago. I'm a very technically 
minded person so have spent most of the time working out patterns for under and 
overbusts with great success...I can say I understand the shapes.
   
  But having recently bought the past patterns edwardian straight front corset 
I am completely dumbfounded as to what these lines are doing to creat this 
dramatic curve.
  I have drafted atleast 6 of my own patterns and sewn 3 mockups but I seem to 
be going further from the solution, I've had a look at the patterns here aswell.
   
  My question is this, I'm not asking for trade secrets but can someone tell me 
how each line of a straight front pattern affects the end result shape? I've 
noticed there are incredibly large gaps between pieces in the waist and bust 
sometimes adding upto 6-8 inches reduction.
  Also the s-curve line...should it be located dead on the side line? Straight 
or at an angle? Should the waistline be angled upwards towards the back? Should 
the top and bottom follow suit or stay straight?
   
  I mean I basically understand the principle of it, basically it's just like a 
normal corset with the waist reduced as normal. Then from the side you pull 
back the top and bottom lines until the front is straight and the back gets 
curved but looking at the patterns there must be more to it.
   
  If anyone who drafts there own patterns could give me some technical insight 
it would be much appreciated. You see I don't want to just copy patterns, I 
want to understand how there made giving me a greater insight into making my 
own.
  I have looked at every resource there is on the net and I can't find anything 
technical to help me and I'm sick of not understanding what I'm doing when 
drafting.

   
-
 Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Edwardian Straight Front Theory

2007-06-12 Thread Lavolta Press

snip
   
  But having recently bought the past patterns edwardian straight front corset


I am completely dumbfounded as to what these lines are doing to creat 
this dramatic curve.
  



I haven't made this pattern, though I have made Victorian corsets.

One thing to remember about the fashionable Edwardian S-curve silhouette 
is that it involves more than the corset.  First, fashionable women wore 
hip pads.


Second, the S-shape was enhanced considerably by a fashionable posture: 
 Lean forward from the waist and stick out your behind, BUT, also 
thrust your bosom out (also padded if necessary, or enhanced with a 
ruffled corset cover; the effect should be as if your bosom was placed 
rather low), AND, throw your head backward.


When feasible: Also, put one hand behind your back at waist level, with 
your elbow bent and the back of your hand pressing against the small of 
your back.  Use your other hand to hold a parasol, or to lean on the 
back of a chair or something.


Fran
Lavolta Press Books of Historic Costume Patterns
http://www.lavoltapress.com


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Edwardian Straight Front Theory

2007-06-12 Thread AlbertCat
 
In a message dated 6/12/2007 11:39:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But  having recently bought the past patterns edwardian straight front  corset



**
 
 
I HATE that pattern! It has little to do with the envelope illustration.  
Find another pattern!



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] Edwardian Straight Front Theory

2007-06-12 Thread Penny Ladnier
I just taught this lesson a week and a half ago, so it is fresh in my mine. 
I have done research as to what makes the S-shape silhouette.  I also teach 
this in my class and dress out forms to show the students how this look was 
created.  My grades or in (YIPPEE) so I have time to read the list again!


The S-shape gives an illusion of a very small waist.  It is an illusion! 
The silhouette is called pigeon-breast, but was first called the Marie 
Antoinette Dip or Parisian Dip.  The bodice and skirt waistline are worn 
lower in the front and higher in the back.  This difference from previous 
silhouettes is  that the back can be from 1-2 higher than a normal 
waistline.  .  I have online an article from Delineator magazine, Sept. 
1900,  titled The Dressmaker: The Maier Antoinette Dip by A.L. Gorman.   I 
also provide online some examples of fashion plates and some of Butterick's 
patterns for the dipped shirt.  The rear pad is not as large as the previous 
decade.  The bust can be made larger with bust improvers.  Alden O'Brien at 
DAR in Washington DC has a wonderful wire mesh bust improver. The bodice of 
the Parisian Dip creates a mono-bosom. The bodices for these dresses have an 
inner bodice that are usually boned similar to a corset.  If a woman is not 
well endowed, this look needs an improver or stuffing in-between the two 
bodices.  The outer bodice generally has a generous amount of fabric 
compared to the inner bodice.  Most of the bodices that I have worked with 
have a petersham band to hold the bodice in place.  From the photos I have 
observed, large women look really nice in this silhouette.  Small chested 
women do not create the silhouette well without enhancers.  The skirts from 
1899-the Edwardian period have really unique designs.  I admire the 
detailing and overlaid panels/yokes made onto/into them.  The skirts in 
period magazines are described by how many gores are in the skirt.  The 
skirt gores are generally in odd number, 3, 5, 7, etc.


The petticoats of this time followed the same waistline placement as the 
skirt.  I have several petticoats with the flat center front and layers of 
ruffles in the back.  One that comes to mind has five rows of ruffles on the 
train or sweep.  The top row (first) is the widest and starts near the 
placement of our present day side seams.  Each ruffle is about 1.5  deep. 
I have all of this measured and in my notes for the petticoat's photograph 
on my computer.  The second row of ruffles  is shorter in length but the 
depth is the same for all ruffles.  Each row to #5 is shorter in length than 
the previous.  Row 5 is not very long.  The rows of ruffles are set upon the 
petticoat.   The center back seam for this petticoat has mirroring wedge 
shaped gores from about the knee down.  The skirt's sweep of the Parisian 
Dip skirt is very important to the silhouette.  Last semester I found 
another Delineator article  about the different types of sweeps/trains and 
their names for this time period.  I plan to get this article and one more 
on this subject online this summer.


The beginning of the Parisian Dip is smaller and more of a funnel shape, 
almost V-shaped at the centerfront waistline.  It almost comes in a point 
just below the normal waistline.  I have a lot of these bodices and no belt 
is worn exteriorly.  Most have a built in girdle at the bottom.  The midriff 
area in the lower front generally has several bones.  Some of the girdles 
have separate bones from the inner bodice.  As the decade progresses the 
lower front bodice becomes more rounded or bloused looking more like the 
pigeon's breast (the real bird.)  I need to look at my fashion magazines 
this summer and try to pin-point around when in 1899 the Parisian Dip makes 
its debut.


This style is also fashionable today for evening wear.  Look at Jessica 
Biel's Oscar dress, 
http://www.oscar.com/oscarnight/redcarpet/?pn=galleryg=0i=4  This 
silhouette has been all over the fashion mags since the Oscars.  The dip is 
becoming more pronounced every month generally with a dark colored belt.  I 
guess with Jennifer Lopez making having a booty fashionable, this silhouette 
returning to fashion's limelight makes sense.  It seems I recall my students 
from the spring semester pointed out three actresses wearing Parisian Dip 
dresses at the Oscars.  I showed an Oscar Red Carpet video to my students 
and they had to pin-point fashions inspired from previous decades.   Most of 
the students got the time frames incorrect on the Oscar project. But this 
was near the beginning of the semester. The last week of class each student 
is required to give me a current fashion magazine. Then as part of my final 
exam, I hand the magazine back to them.  I gave them 30 minutes to find 5 
fashions that are inspired from the time periods they have studied.  They 
had to write an argument about why they thought each fashion was inspired 
from a previous decade.  Last Friday's final exam, only two