Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-12 Thread Jean Waddie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
 In a message dated 4/4/2008 8:30:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Someone  recently told me that it was a sign of refinement/education to be be
 to  spell a word in different ways. Anyone ever hear of this?  



 
  
 Not your, you're and yore. Or two, to and too.
  
 I suppose it might seem cosmopolitan to know color is colour in Britain  
 or that you can shop at a shoppe... but it's really just having a good vocab. 
  
 English has like 3 times more words in it than other languages... stolen from 
  other languages... which is why we have so many different spellings and  
 homonyms.
   
There's a quote from Mark Twain, I don't give a damn for a man that can 
only spell a word one way.  Maybe that's what they were thinking of?  
Rather out of date now that standardised spelling is the  norm.

Jean

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-05 Thread Susan Carroll-Clark
Ruth Anne Baumgartner wrote:
 And then there are the Americans who assume EVERY British accent is a  
 HIGH-CLASS British accent. Someone said to me about an acquaintance  
 who does indeed speak with a Cockney accent, I love to hear his  
 accent! It's so refined! 

That's hilarious.  Guess they've never seen My Fair Lady, then

My favourite is when folks mix up Aussie with British of any sort.  They 
really are quite different.

On the evolution of American accents--I've been told that the 
Appalachian dialects are descendents of Scots and Irish dialects, while 
the Virginian/mid-Atlantic accent is probably closest to an upper-class 
British dialect (although I'm not sure I've ever heard what region of 
Britain).

Susan

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-05 Thread AlbertCat
 
In a message dated 4/4/2008 8:30:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Someone  recently told me that it was a sign of refinement/education to be be
to  spell a word in different ways. Anyone ever hear of this?  




 
Not your, you're and yore. Or two, to and too.
 
I suppose it might seem cosmopolitan to know color is colour in Britain  
or that you can shop at a shoppe... but it's really just having a good vocab.  
English has like 3 times more words in it than other languages... stolen from 
 other languages... which is why we have so many different spellings and  
homonyms.



**Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-05 Thread AlbertCat
To try to relate my improve your vocab post to costumes:
 
I love Handel, particularly the oratorio L'allegro, Il Penseroso, et il  
Moderato which is [mostly] Milton set to music. Now I don't sit around the 
pool  
reading Milton [might be nice though] but because Handel set his English  
verse to very nice catchy tunes, one tends to learn the words and sing  along.
 
One fine tenor aria is I'll to the well trod stage anon. The second line  
being If Johnson's learned sock be on. What? What the hell does that  mean? 
The next line is Or sweetest Shakespeare, Fancy's child, so  Johnson refers 
to Ben Johnson, a younger contemporary of Shakespeare. But his  sock? His 
learned knitted footwear is laying on the stage?
 
So I looked up sock... one definition I didn't know was: 3  a : a shoe worn 
by actors in Greek and Roman comedy
b : comic drama. [there...a costume reference] 

So Johnson's learned sock is one of his comedieswhich are full of  
biting satire so there's also an implication toward a punch, smack!
 
See...improved vocab skills and costuming the  feet.




**Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


[h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-04 Thread Ruth Anne Baumgartner
And then there are the Americans who assume EVERY British accent is a  
HIGH-CLASS British accent. Someone said to me about an acquaintance  
who does indeed speak with a Cockney accent, I love to hear his  
accent! It's so refined! And a friend who works at the stage supply  
company says she can always recognize one particular community- 
theater box office tape on the phone because the speaker has a phony  
British accent, which people seem to equate with being artistes!
(No offense intended to any true Brits out there who ARE artistes, or  
to Cockneys who ARE refined!)

--Ruth Anne Baumgartner
gipsy scholar and amateur costumer


On Apr 3, 2008, at 8:47 PM, Chris Bertani wrote:

 On 03 Apr 2008, Kate M Bunting wrote:

 Dianne wrote:
 Point was simply that it would be harder for an American to  
 distinguish
 between regional British accents, as it would be hard for someone  
 from
 England to distinguish between say, Michigan and Ohio.

  and Susan Carroll-Clark replied :

 Those states in particular are a really good case in point.   
 There isn't
 an Ohio accent--there are three or four, at least.  There's the
 Cleveland/Northern accent (fairly nasal, somewhat akin to the  
 typical
 Michigan accent), the Appalachian accent (SE part of the state,  
 akin to
 West Virginia and eastern Kentucky), and two Midwestern accents -- 
 one a
 little more generic than the other (which involves people saying  
 warsh
 for wash and crick for creek).

 So are there several varieties of Yorkshire accent, as it's a  
 large county (my mother came from East Yorks.). My original point  
 was that Northern English speech in general is very different from  
 Cockney (working-class London) speech. Even I can tell the  
 difference between a New York and a Deep South accent!


 I may not be able to tell a Tennessee accent from a Kentucky  
 accent, but
 I also know better than to call something a Kentucky accent when I  
 can't
 tell the difference.  I've noticed a disturbing tendency among some
 Americans to call all british accents Cockney, which bothers me no
 end.  I've even heard the pirate accent (which is descended from
 Robert Newton's Cornish accent in Treasure Island) described as
 Cockney

 -- Chris Bertani
 www.goblinrevolution.org/costumes
 ___
 h-costume mailing list
 h-costume@mail.indra.com
 http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-04 Thread Alexandria Doyle
We have a lady in our local group who is British, complete with
accent.   There have been those who didn't know she was British
complain about the cheesy accent, thinking she was faking it.   Even
when pointed out she's not faking, they still insisted it sounded
cheesy.

alex

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Ruth Anne Baumgartner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And then there are the Americans who assume EVERY British accent is a
  HIGH-CLASS British accent. Someone said to me about an acquaintance
  who does indeed speak with a Cockney accent, I love to hear his
  accent! It's so refined! And a friend who works at the stage supply
  company says she can always recognize one particular community-
  theater box office tape on the phone because the speaker has a phony
  British accent, which people seem to equate with being artistes!
  (No offense intended to any true Brits out there who ARE artistes, or
  to Cockneys who ARE refined!)

  --Ruth Anne Baumgartner
  gipsy scholar and amateur costumer

  --
I'm buying this fabric/book now in case I have an emergency...you
know, having to suddenly make presents for everyone, sickness,flood,
injury, mosquito infestations, not enough silk in the house, it's
Friday... ;)
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-04 Thread Ron Carnegie
  A friend of mine at work gets this all the time.  People often remark on
how awful his attempt at a Scottish accent is, being unaware that he was
born and raised in Glasgow.

Ron Carnegie



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alexandria Doyle
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:51 AM
To: Historical Costume
Subject: Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

We have a lady in our local group who is British, complete with
accent.   There have been those who didn't know she was British
complain about the cheesy accent, thinking she was faking it.   Even
when pointed out she's not faking, they still insisted it sounded
cheesy.

alex


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-04 Thread Exstock
- Original Message - 
From: Ruth Anne Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ... And a friend who works at the stage supply
 company says she can always recognize one particular community-
 theater box office tape on the phone because the speaker has a phony
 British accent, which people seem to equate with being artistes!
 (No offense intended to any true Brits out there who ARE artistes, or
 to Cockneys who ARE refined!)

Reminds me of a favorite line from some movie I can't think of: Is she 
British, or just affected?

The whole topic, though, reminds me of something that I love to research 
when I have a spare second: the development of the American (and British) 
accent.  I always wondered what, for example, people like Benjamin Franklin 
actually sounded like when they talked.  I mean, it would make sense that 
their accents would be a lot closer to modern British than modern American, 
right?  As it turns out, no, but not the other way round, either.  If anyone 
in the 18th century sounded like anyone in the 21st century, it was the 
18thC Brits; they sounded like 21st century Americans.  Apparently the Brits 
had this thing for following linguistic fashions, which the Americans 
largely ignored, leaving regional British accents almost intact in the 
associated American regions.  (Although we did finally follow suit and rid 
ourselves of that whole thing where the a in father sounded like the a 
in modern-American-accent apple, though.  Whew.)

OK, completely off topic, and I'm explaining it poorly anyway!

-E House 

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-04 Thread Abel, Cynthia
No, you are explaining it very well. Although mass communication is
affecting regional accents in the world, and not always postively in my
small opinion, isolated areas in Britain and the U.S. can still
understand each other better than most citizens living in Britain and
the US can. I had a professor in college that would read passages from
Shakespeare and Chaucer as closely as was known then to original
pronunciation, and I found it fascinating to hear what sounded like
French and Scottish words within early modern English. We also read some
passages ourselves reprinted from the oldest surviving source aloud
after being told to start by pronouncing the words as they were spelled.
Of course, the caveat was that we were also told that we might be closer
to how the typesetter pronounced the words, rather than Chaucer or
Shakespeare. I fear we are losing a lot of expression within languages
through the present mass-media homogenization.

Cindy Abel   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Exstock
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 1:36 PM
To: Historical Costume
Subject: Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

- Original Message -
From: Ruth Anne Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ... And a friend who works at the stage supply company says she can 
 always recognize one particular community- theater box office tape on 
 the phone because the speaker has a phony British accent, which 
 people seem to equate with being artistes!
 (No offense intended to any true Brits out there who ARE artistes, or 
 to Cockneys who ARE refined!)

Reminds me of a favorite line from some movie I can't think of: Is she
British, or just affected?

The whole topic, though, reminds me of something that I love to research
when I have a spare second: the development of the American (and
British) accent.  I always wondered what, for example, people like
Benjamin Franklin actually sounded like when they talked.  I mean, it
would make sense that their accents would be a lot closer to modern
British than modern American, right?  As it turns out, no, but not the
other way round, either.  If anyone in the 18th century sounded like
anyone in the 21st century, it was the 18thC Brits; they sounded like
21st century Americans.  Apparently the Brits had this thing for
following linguistic fashions, which the Americans largely ignored,
leaving regional British accents almost intact in the associated
American regions.  (Although we did finally follow suit and rid
ourselves of that whole thing where the a in father sounded like the
a 
in modern-American-accent apple, though.  Whew.)

OK, completely off topic, and I'm explaining it poorly anyway!

-E House 

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-04 Thread AlbertCat
 
In a message dated 4/4/2008 3:09:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

We also  read some
passages ourselves reprinted from the oldest surviving source  aloud
after being told to start by pronouncing the words as they were  spelled.



*
 
 
Lord! I had a book of early Tudor plays [like Roister Doister] printed  
with their original spellings. They'd spell if 3 different ways in the  same 
speech! if iff  iffe .



**Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

2008-04-04 Thread Sharon Collier
Someone recently told me that it was a sign of refinement/education to be be
to spell a word in different ways. Anyone ever hear of this? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [h-cost] OT Re: Regional accents, was Making history hip

 
In a message dated 4/4/2008 3:09:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

We also  read some
passages ourselves reprinted from the oldest surviving source  aloud after
being told to start by pronouncing the words as they were  spelled.



*
 
 
Lord! I had a book of early Tudor plays [like Roister Doister] printed
with their original spellings. They'd spell if 3 different ways in the
same speech! if iff  iffe .



**Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.

 
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume