[h-cost] lovely find

2007-06-18 Thread otsisto
1879 home robe
http://www.antiquedress.com/item4260.htm

De

___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] lovely find

2007-06-18 Thread Sheridan
Now that is an excellent reminder that old-e time-y clothing was most 
definitely not drab and dark. 

Beautiful!

Sheridan P

 
 From: otsisto [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 1879 home robe
 http://www.antiquedress.com/item4260.htm
 
 De


___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] lovely find

2007-06-18 Thread Jean Waddie
Just what I thought!  How wonderful to have the photo as well - but 
looking at the photo I would never have guessed the dress was bright 
red.


I seem to remember that when we only had black and white TV I was more 
used to recognising colours from their shading - watching snooker was 
not as pointless as it sounds.  I wonder if people were better at 
understanding the colours in Victorian photos when colour printing was 
less common?


Jean


Sheridan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Now that is an excellent reminder that old-e time-y clothing was most 
definitely not drab and dark.


Beautiful!

Sheridan P



From: otsisto [EMAIL PROTECTED]



1879 home robe
http://www.antiquedress.com/item4260.htm

De



___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


--
Jean Waddie
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] lovely find

2007-06-18 Thread Cynthia Virtue

Jean Waddie wrote:
Just what I thought!  How wonderful to have the photo as well - but 
looking at the photo I would never have guessed the dress was bright red.


I seem to remember that when we only had black and white TV I was more 
used to recognising colours from their shading - watching snooker was 
not as pointless as it sounds.  I wonder if people were better at 
understanding the colours in Victorian photos when colour printing was 
less common?
There used to be a page showing the color registrations of different 
real-world colors depending on the old-fashioned BW photo process used 
-- I found it via this list 5+ years ago.  However, the page is no 
longer there and I haven't been able to find it again.  There was a sort 
of color wheel in black and white with the real-world color listed, for 
each process.


Some of the old types registered yellow as a light color, and some 
registered it as a dark color, and some of the other colors likewise had 
varying representations.  It was very interesting.


cv
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume


Re: [h-cost] lovely find

2007-06-18 Thread AnnBWass
 
In a message dated 6/18/2007 5:27:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I wonder  if people were better at 
understanding the colours in Victorian photos  when colour printing was 
less common?



Remember that early photographic processes were more sensitive to blue  
shades, and less to red and yellow--so reds and even yellows will generally  
photograph as dark.  
 
I would love to know if the red is a synthetic or natural dye.
 
Ann Wass



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
___
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume