Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-28 Thread Shahar Dag

- Original Message - 
From: Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
To: Shahar Dag d...@cs.technion.ac.il
Cc: Haifux haifux@haifux.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop


 I disagree with the suggestion to hide the browser we use.

 If I, as a web muster that works with IE will get some complain, I will
 check it in IE.

 As a result I will find it a false complain and I will be angry with the
 dumb user.

 On the other end if he would mention FireFox I will check it with IE  
 with
 FireFox and at list verify the problem



 Then you are not a good web master. One, you should be checking in
 more than just IE, and if you are so lazy as to not check in any other
 browser than I have no problems with making you angry. Two, you should
 know enough to ask the user what browser he is using.

 Web masters who assume that IE is the only browser are exactly who
 needs to be targeted to fix the problem.

 -- 
 Dotan Cohen

It is true that I am not a good web master.

Failing to test other browsers is not always out of laziness, sometimes is 
just ignorance.

And any how, I think that we want the web master cooperation so why annoy 
him with missing data.



Shahar





___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux


Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-26 Thread Amos Shapira
I'd appreciate to see a summary of the meeting and if there are any
follow-up actions here or maybe one of the foss web sites.
(I might have joined you on-line but it'll happen in my middle of the
night of a work day).

Cheers,
Amos

On 4/25/10, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
 I wish that I had seen this message sooner. I have been contacting
 sites about this issue for years. I hope to be there at 18:30, there
 is a lot that we as a group can do together to convince these sites to
 change.


 --
 Dotan Cohen

 http://bido.com
 http://what-is-what.com

 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 linux...@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux


Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-26 Thread Dotan Cohen
 If you would like to have other means of communicating the current
 target, please let me know by private email.



Orr, we should _not_ all write to the websites at once! It will be
obvious that a small group of zealots is targeting them.

Rather, it should appear to the sites that there are genuine problems
that regularly affect everyday users. We should coordinate so that
each site gets a letter from a different user every week, and don't
even mention the browser or OS in the initial contact letter. I will
gladly volunteer to coordinate this: interested users should
register with me, and once a week (not always on the same weekday) I
will send to them the address of a site to write to. That will ensure
a steady flow of non-related complaints: a tactic that is much more
effective than 5 complains all at once.

I presented this idea before, and advocates such as Shlomi Fish from
Linux-IL showed interest. I will organize everything now, and come to
the meeting prepared.



-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://bido.com
http://what-is-what.com
___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux


Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-26 Thread Orr Dunkelman
Dotan hi,

Even though we haven't tried as a community to approach such
webmasters on a regular basis, history shows that people approached
webmasters as individuals, and usually it did not succeed. Maybe
trying as a group would have a better effect.

Now, approaching several websites at the same time should be OK, as
usually they do not correlate and share information about: hey XXX 
YYY  ZZZ  WWW all sent me complaints about W3C compliance
Moreover, history shows that long term coordinated events are harder
to pull over one time energy spike.

Cheers,
Orr.


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
 If you would like to have other means of communicating the current
 target, please let me know by private email.



 Orr, we should _not_ all write to the websites at once! It will be
 obvious that a small group of zealots is targeting them.

 Rather, it should appear to the sites that there are genuine problems
 that regularly affect everyday users. We should coordinate so that
 each site gets a letter from a different user every week, and don't
 even mention the browser or OS in the initial contact letter. I will
 gladly volunteer to coordinate this: interested users should
 register with me, and once a week (not always on the same weekday) I
 will send to them the address of a site to write to. That will ensure
 a steady flow of non-related complaints: a tactic that is much more
 effective than 5 complains all at once.

 I presented this idea before, and advocates such as Shlomi Fish from
 Linux-IL showed interest. I will organize everything now, and come to
 the meeting prepared.



 --
 Dotan Cohen

 http://bido.com
 http://what-is-what.com




-- 
Orr Dunkelman,
orr.dunkel...@gmail.com

GPG fingerprint: C2D5 C6D6 9A24 9A95 C5B3  2023 6CAB 4A7C B73F D0AA
(This key will never sign Emails, only other PGP keys. The key
corresponds to o...@vipe.technion.ac.il)
___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux


Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-26 Thread Dotan Cohen
 Even though we haven't tried as a community to approach such
 webmasters on a regular basis, history shows that people approached
 webmasters as individuals, and usually it did not succeed. Maybe
 trying as a group would have a better effect.


I disagree. I have contacted tens of sites, and in most cases found
that the sites want to accompany the users. In fact, only Israeli
sites seem to have the my way or the highway attitude, and even that
has changed since IE 7 came out.

We'll talk about that at the meeting.


 Now, approaching several websites at the same time should be OK, as
 usually they do not correlate and share information about: hey XXX 
 YYY  ZZZ  WWW all sent me complaints about W3C compliance
 Moreover, history shows that long term coordinated events are harder
 to pull over one time energy spike.


A one-time event of ten emails is less effective than a one-time event
of a single email. A one-time event of a single email means a lost
purchase. A one-time event of ten emails means some zealots are being
shmucks.



-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://bido.com
http://what-is-what.com
___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux


Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-26 Thread cool-RR
I haven't been following this thread at all, but if you're criticizing
Israeli sites, please include Pelephone's. One of their crimes: In their
login page, if you press Enter instead of clicking the button, it won't
work, and return you to the login screen without showing an error message.
(So you might think you typed the wrong password and waste a lot of time.)

Ram.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Eli Billauer e...@billauer.co.il wrote:

 Orr Dunkelman wrote:

  history shows that people approached
  webmasters as individuals, and usually it did not succeed. Maybe
  trying as a group would have a better effect.
 
 
 Since the event is now over, I'd like to share my opinion about the
 whole web compatibility issue: In short, I think it's a waste of energy.
 Not because it's hopeless, but because it's a war to be won with or
 without the FOSS community in it.

 In the past, non-IE users were mainly Linux users and otherwise geeks. I
 don't justify those who ignored complaints from us, but I can understand
 them. Such a complaint necessarily meant that the person complaining
 knows how to solve his or her problem (that is, install Windows and IE)
 but chooses not to. The fact that the site is defective is bad, but if
 it harms a very small group with some weird ideology about software. In
 particular, if the complaint included terms such as W3C, it's evident
 that it's about ideology and not getting access to the site.

 What is happening, is that Firefox is becoming popular. It's not a W3C
 compliance issue anymore, but a mass of angry users, some of whom aren't
 so technically competent. It's evident in the server's logs, and the
 complaints come from ordinary people. That's a whole different story.

 So what I'm saying is that the switch to compatible sites is ongoing,
 and it has nothing to do with us. I'm pretty sure that almost all
 non-compatible sites have an open project to fix it.

 I therefore suggest that we mind our own business, such as if we will
 have a usable GNU/Linux distribution in a few years, which feels like
 FOSS. That is, assumes that the user is intelligent enough to control
 his or her computer. If the current trend goes on, we'll find ourselves
 with Windows clones very soon, for better and for worse.

   Eli

 --
 Web: http://www.billauer.co.il

 ___
 Haifux mailing list
 Haifux@haifux.org
 http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux




-- 
Sincerely,
Ram Rachum
___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux


Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-26 Thread Orr Dunkelman
As Dotan pointed out in the meeting, the problems are going to slowly
disappear, as both IE 9.0 is more standard-friendly and as more and
more people browse using their mobile devices.

At the same time, the more people complain, the faster the support
would come. So if a tech junkie would complain with prob. 10%, and a
non-tech junkie would complain with prob. 1%, then you can do the
math. We still matter. Especially in cases where we increase our rate
to 100% complaints.

The less non-tech junkies complain two things happen:
1. your complaint is more important.
2. the managers who know that only 1% of the population actually
complain, treat the complaints by the tech junkies as more
representing.

Cheers,

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Eli Billauer e...@billauer.co.il wrote:
 Orr Dunkelman wrote:

 history shows that people approached
 webmasters as individuals, and usually it did not succeed. Maybe
 trying as a group would have a better effect.



 Since the event is now over, I'd like to share my opinion about the whole
 web compatibility issue: In short, I think it's a waste of energy. Not
 because it's hopeless, but because it's a war to be won with or without the
 FOSS community in it.

 In the past, non-IE users were mainly Linux users and otherwise geeks. I
 don't justify those who ignored complaints from us, but I can understand
 them. Such a complaint necessarily meant that the person complaining knows
 how to solve his or her problem (that is, install Windows and IE) but
 chooses not to. The fact that the site is defective is bad, but if it harms
 a very small group with some weird ideology about software. In particular,
 if the complaint included terms such as W3C, it's evident that it's about
 ideology and not getting access to the site.

 What is happening, is that Firefox is becoming popular. It's not a W3C
 compliance issue anymore, but a mass of angry users, some of whom aren't so
 technically competent. It's evident in the server's logs, and the complaints
 come from ordinary people. That's a whole different story.

 So what I'm saying is that the switch to compatible sites is ongoing, and it
 has nothing to do with us. I'm pretty sure that almost all non-compatible
 sites have an open project to fix it.

 I therefore suggest that we mind our own business, such as if we will have a
 usable GNU/Linux distribution in a few years, which feels like FOSS. That
 is, assumes that the user is intelligent enough to control his or her
 computer. If the current trend goes on, we'll find ourselves with Windows
 clones very soon, for better and for worse.

  Eli

 --
 Web: http://www.billauer.co.il





-- 
Orr Dunkelman,
orr.dunkel...@gmail.com

GPG fingerprint: C2D5 C6D6 9A24 9A95 C5B3  2023 6CAB 4A7C B73F D0AA
(This key will never sign Emails, only other PGP keys. The key
corresponds to o...@vipe.technion.ac.il)
___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux


Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX Workshop] The Web Rant Workshop

2010-04-25 Thread Dotan Cohen
I wish that I had seen this message sooner. I have been contacting
sites about this issue for years. I hope to be there at 18:30, there
is a lot that we as a group can do together to convince these sites to
change.


-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://bido.com
http://what-is-what.com
___
Haifux mailing list
Haifux@haifux.org
http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux