How to allow larger cookie for particular backend site.
Hi Team, I am using "tune.maxrewrite 16384", "tune.bufsize 32768" these values to allow larger cookie value globally, but I want to allow larger cookie value for specific site means for particular backend site not to all backend sites. I have searching for in haproxy docs and some blogs but I didn't get solution for it. So, could you guys help on it. Thanks & Regards Rajesh Kolli
RE: Need to understand logs
Hi PiBa, Thank you for clarifying my doubt, this is what I am expecting. My doubt is cleared. Thanks to all of you for spending time for me. Thanks & Regards Rajesh Kolli -Original Message- From: PiBa-NL [mailto:piba.nl@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:06 PM To: Rajesh Kolli; 'Aleksandar Lazic' Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: Need to understand logs Hi Rajesh, Aleksander, Op 11-9-2017 om 10:32 schreef Rajesh Kolli: > Hi Aleksandar, > > Thank you for clarifying about "Layer 4" checks. > > I am interested in knowing the values of these %d/%d, %s in line 319. > Why it is taking only 1/2, 1/3... values? What they are representing? Have you seen rise & fall in the documentation? http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.8/snapshot/configuration.html#rise http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.8/snapshot/configuration.html#5.2-fall Basically it takes by default 3 consecutive failed checks to mark a server down, and 2 passed checks to get it back up. So 1/3 is 1 failed check but server status is still 'up'. Then 2/3 failed check, but still marked up. At 3/3 the server would be marked down, and removed from the backend pool. Then after a while when the webserver is working again the following will happen. After the first successful 1/2 check the server is still marked 'down'. And on the second 2/2 successful check it will be marked 'up' and is added back into the backend server pool to take requests. > 319 "chunk_appendf(, ", status: %d/%d %s", > 320 (check->health >= check->rise) ? > check->health - check->rise + 1 : check->health, > 321 (check->health >= check->rise) ? > check->fall : check->rise, > 322 (check->health >= check->rise) ? > (s->uweight ? "UP" : "DRAIN") : "DOWN"); > 323 > > Thanks & Regards > Rajesh Kolli > > -Original Message- > From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at] > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 9:37 PM > To: Rajesh Kolli; haproxy@formilux.org > Subject: Re: Need to understand logs > > Hi Rajesh. > > Rajesh Kolli wrote on 08.09.2017: > >> Hi Aleksandar, >> Thank you for your response. Yes, I am using "Log-health-checks" in >> my configuration and here is my HAProxy version information. > Thanks. > > sorry to say that but for know you can only take a look into the > source for documenation. > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.7.git=search=HEAD=grep=PR > _O2_LO > GHCHKS > > for example. > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.7.git;a=blob;f=src/checks.c;hb=640 > d526f8 > cdad00f7f5043b51f6a34f3f6ebb49f#l307 > > We are open for patches also for documentation to add this part to the > docs > ;-) > > To answer your question below I think layer 4 checks are 'only' tcp > checks which sometimes are answered by some os when a service is > listen on the specific port. > > This does not means that the App works properly. > > I'm open for any correction when my assumption is wrong. > > Regards > Aleks > >> [root@DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 ~]# haproxy -vv HA-Proxy version 1.7.8 >> 2017/07/07 Copyright 2000-2017 Willy Tarreau <wi...@haproxy.org> >> Build options : >>TARGET = linux2628 >>CPU = generic >>CC = gcc >>CFLAGS = -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing >> -Wdeclaration-after-statement > -fwrapv >>OPTIONS = >> Default settings : >>maxconn = 2000, bufsize = 16384, maxrewrite = 1024, maxpollevents >> = >> 200 > >> Thanks & Regards >> Rajesh Kolli >> -Original Message- >> From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at] >> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 10:08 PM >> To: Rajesh Kolli; haproxy@formilux.org >> Subject: Re: Need to understand logs >> Hi Rajesh. >> Rajesh Kolli wrote on 07.09.2017: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am using HAProxy community version from a month, i need to >>> understand logs of HAProxy for the i need your help. >>> >>> Here is a sample of my logs: >>> Sep 6 17:03:31 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server >>> Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 >>> check passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 1/2 DOWN. >>> Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server >>> Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 >>> check passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 3/3 UP. >>> Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Server >>> Ne
RE: Need to understand logs
Hi Aleksandar, Thank you for clarifying about "Layer 4" checks. I am interested in knowing the values of these %d/%d, %s in line 319. Why it is taking only 1/2, 1/3... values? What they are representing? 319"chunk_appendf(, ", status: %d/%d %s", 320 (check->health >= check->rise) ? check->health - check->rise + 1 : check->health, 321 (check->health >= check->rise) ? check->fall : check->rise, 322 (check->health >= check->rise) ? (s->uweight ? "UP" : "DRAIN") : "DOWN"); 323 Thanks & Regards Rajesh Kolli -Original Message- From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at] Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 9:37 PM To: Rajesh Kolli; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: Need to understand logs Hi Rajesh. Rajesh Kolli wrote on 08.09.2017: > Hi Aleksandar, > Thank you for your response. Yes, I am using "Log-health-checks" in my > configuration and here is my HAProxy version information. Thanks. sorry to say that but for know you can only take a look into the source for documenation. http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.7.git=search=HEAD=grep=PR_O2_LO GHCHKS for example. http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.7.git;a=blob;f=src/checks.c;hb=640d526f8 cdad00f7f5043b51f6a34f3f6ebb49f#l307 We are open for patches also for documentation to add this part to the docs ;-) To answer your question below I think layer 4 checks are 'only' tcp checks which sometimes are answered by some os when a service is listen on the specific port. This does not means that the App works properly. I'm open for any correction when my assumption is wrong. Regards Aleks > [root@DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 ~]# haproxy -vv HA-Proxy version 1.7.8 > 2017/07/07 Copyright 2000-2017 Willy Tarreau <wi...@haproxy.org> > Build options : > TARGET = linux2628 > CPU = generic > CC = gcc > CFLAGS = -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fwrapv > OPTIONS = > Default settings : > maxconn = 2000, bufsize = 16384, maxrewrite = 1024, maxpollevents = > 200 > Thanks & Regards > Rajesh Kolli > -Original Message- > From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at] > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 10:08 PM > To: Rajesh Kolli; haproxy@formilux.org > Subject: Re: Need to understand logs > Hi Rajesh. > Rajesh Kolli wrote on 07.09.2017: >> Hello, >> >> I am using HAProxy community version from a month, i need to >> understand logs of HAProxy for the i need your help. >> >> Here is a sample of my logs: >> Sep 6 17:03:31 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server >> Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 >> check passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 1/2 DOWN. >> Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server >> Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 >> check passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 3/3 UP. >> Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Server >> Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 is UP. 2 active and 0 backup >> servers online. 0 sessions requeued, 0 total in queue. >> >> Here my doubts are, in first line health check is 1/2 DOWN and 2nd >> line it is 3/3 UP, in both cases Layer4 check passed. How to >> understand it? what exactly it is checking? what are these 1/2 & 1/3's? >> >> Finally, is there any document to understand its logging? > There is a logging part in the doc but I haven't seen such entries in the document. > http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.7/configuration.html#8 > Maybe you have activated > http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.7/configuration.html#4.2-optio > n%20log-health-checks > in your config. > It would be nice to know which haproxy version you use. > haproxy -vv > -- > Best Regards > Aleks > https://www.me2digital.com/ -- Best Regards Aleks
RE: Need to understand logs
Hi Aleksandar, Thank you for your response. Yes, I am using "Log-health-checks" in my configuration and here is my HAProxy version information. [root@DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 ~]# haproxy -vv HA-Proxy version 1.7.8 2017/07/07 Copyright 2000-2017 Willy Tarreau <wi...@haproxy.org> Build options : TARGET = linux2628 CPU = generic CC = gcc CFLAGS = -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fwrapv OPTIONS = Default settings : maxconn = 2000, bufsize = 16384, maxrewrite = 1024, maxpollevents = 200 Thanks & Regards Rajesh Kolli -Original Message- From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 10:08 PM To: Rajesh Kolli; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: Need to understand logs Hi Rajesh. Rajesh Kolli wrote on 07.09.2017: > Hello, > > I am using HAProxy community version from a month, i need to > understand logs of HAProxy for the i need your help. > > Here is a sample of my logs: > Sep 6 17:03:31 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server > Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 check > passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 1/2 DOWN. > Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server > Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 check > passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 3/3 UP. > Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Server > Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 is UP. 2 active and 0 backup > servers online. 0 sessions requeued, 0 total in queue. > > Here my doubts are, in first line health check is 1/2 DOWN and 2nd > line it is 3/3 UP, in both cases Layer4 check passed. How to > understand it? what exactly it is checking? what are these 1/2 & 1/3's? > > Finally, is there any document to understand its logging? There is a logging part in the doc but I haven't seen such entries in the document. http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.7/configuration.html#8 Maybe you have activated http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.7/configuration.html#4.2-option%20log-health-checks in your config. It would be nice to know which haproxy version you use. haproxy -vv -- Best Regards Aleks https://www.me2digital.com/
Need to understand logs
Hello, I am using HAProxy community version from a month, i need to understand logs of HAProxy for the i need your help. Here is a sample of my logs: Sep 6 17:03:31 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 check passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 1/2 DOWN. Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Health check for server Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 succeeded, reason: Layer4 check passed, check duration: 0ms, status: 3/3 UP. Sep 6 17:03:33 localhost haproxy[19389]: Server Netrovert-sites/DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node2 is UP. 2 active and 0 backup servers online. 0 sessions requeued, 0 total in queue. Here my doubts are, in first line health check is 1/2 DOWN and 2nd line it is 3/3 UP, in both cases Layer4 check passed. How to understand it? what exactly it is checking? what are these 1/2 & 1/3's? Finally, is there any document to understand its logging? -- *Thanks & RegardsRajesh Kolli*
Re: Will HAProxy community supports mailers section?
Hi All, Thanks for your support. Earlier I have upgraded from 1.4 to 1.7 using source then haproxy working but alerting is not working. I have checked haproxy version using cli command and it has given 1.7.x but if I query rpm then it's giving 1.4.x then I realized that upgrade has some issue. At least, I have download latest rpm RedHat and installed it then every thing is working and alerts too working. On 24 Aug 2017 7:57 pm, "Frederic Lecaille" <flecai...@haproxy.com> wrote: > On 08/24/2017 03:35 PM, Rajesh Kolli wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I have changed my config file according to you, even though i am getting >> the same error. >> - >> haproxy.service - HAProxy Load Balancer >>Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/haproxy.service; enabled) >>Active: inactive (dead) since Thu 2017-08-24 19:04:14 IST; 6s ago >> Process: 7641 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/haproxy-systemd-wrapper -f >> /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /run/haproxy.pid (code=exited, >> status=0/SUCCESS) >> Main PID: 7641 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) >> >> Aug 24 19:04:14 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 systemd[1]: Starting HAProxy Load >> Balancer... >> Aug 24 19:04:14 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 systemd[1]: Started HAProxy Load >> Balancer. >> Aug 24 19:04:14 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[7641]: >> [ALERT] 235/190414 (7642) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:9]: >> unknown keyword 'mailers' out of section. >> Aug 24 19:04:14 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[7641]: >> [ALERT] 235/190414 (7642) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:10]: >> unknown keyword 'mailer' out of section. >> Aug 24 19:04:14 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[7641]: >> [ALERT] 235/190414 (7642) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:121] : >> unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section >> > > Well I would at least say that your haproxy does not support "email-alert" > keyword ;) > > If I configure a 1.7 haproxy *without* any "mailers" section *but* with a > "email-alert mailers mta" setting in "backend" sections the parser does not > say it does not known "email-alert" keyword. It says: unable to find > "mailers" mta. > > So even your haproxy could support "mailers" keyword, as it does not > support "email-alert", this would be for nothing ;) > > You should try the same thing: remove/comment your "mailers" section, and > see if you still have "unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section". > > AFAIK, "email-alert" may be followed by a "mailers" keyword ;) > > Or perhaps I have missed something. >
Re: Will HAProxy community supports mailers section?
Hi, I am using latest version. [root@DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 ~]# haproxy -v HA-Proxy version 1.7.8 2017/07/07 Copyright 2000-2017 Willy Tarreau <wi...@haproxy.org> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Jérôme Magnin <jmag...@haproxy.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 06:50:51PM +0530, Rajesh Kolli wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Thanks for your quick response... > > > > i am getting this error if i use mailers section in my configuration. > > > - > > [root@DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 ~]# systemctl status haproxy.service -l > > haproxy.service - HAProxy Load Balancer > >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/haproxy.service; enabled) > >Active: inactive (dead) since Thu 2017-08-24 18:43:23 IST; 4s ago > > Process: 6511 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/haproxy-systemd-wrapper -f > > /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /run/haproxy.pid (code=exited, > status=0/SUCCESS) > > Main PID: 6511 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > > > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 systemd[1]: Starting HAProxy Load > > Balancer... > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 systemd[1]: Started HAProxy Load > > Balancer. > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:81] : > unknown > > keyword 'mailers' in 'listen' section > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:82] : > unknown > > keyword 'mailer' in 'listen' section > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:117] : > > unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:119] : > > unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:120] : > > unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : Error(s) found in configuration file : > > /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : Fatal errors found in configuration. > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > > haproxy-systemd-wrapper: exit, haproxy RC=256 > > > > Hello Rajesh, > > you are most likely running a version in which mailers is not implemented > (<1.6). > > Jérôme > -- *Thanks & RegardsRajesh Kolli*
Re: Will HAProxy community supports mailers section?
t; > backend app > balance roundrobin > #option httpchk #HEAD / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost:\ localhost#Check the > server application is up and healty - 200 status code > server 11-80-R7-CLST-Node110.10.11.80:80 check > server DS-11-81-R7-CLST-Node210.10.11.81:80 check > > email-alert mailers mta > #email-alert level alert > email-alert from redm...@netrovert.net > email-alert to rajesh.ko...@netrovert.net > > Regards, > Daniel > > Am 24.08.17 um 15:20 schrieb Rajesh Kolli: > > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for your quick response... > > i am getting this error if i use mailers section in my configuration. > > - > [root@DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 ~]# systemctl status haproxy.service -l > haproxy.service - HAProxy Load Balancer >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/haproxy.service; enabled) >Active: inactive (dead) since Thu 2017-08-24 18:43:23 IST; 4s ago > Process: 6511 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/haproxy-systemd-wrapper -f > /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /run/haproxy.pid (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Main PID: 6511 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 systemd[1]: Starting HAProxy Load > Balancer... > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 systemd[1]: Started HAProxy Load > Balancer. > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:81] : unknown > keyword 'mailers' in 'listen' section > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:82] : unknown > keyword 'mailer' in 'listen' section > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:117] : > unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:119] : > unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:120] : > unknown keyword 'email-alert' in 'backend' section > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : Error(s) found in configuration file : > /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > [ALERT] 235/184323 (6512) : Fatal errors found in configuration. > Aug 24 18:43:23 DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 haproxy-systemd-wrapper[6511]: > haproxy-systemd-wrapper: exit, haproxy RC=256 > > > > Here is my config file > > [root@DS-11-82-R7-CLST-Node1 ~]# cat /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg > #- > # Global settings > #- > global > log 127.0.0.1 local2 > > chroot /var/lib/haproxy > pidfile /var/run/haproxy.pid > maxconn 4000 > userhaproxy > group haproxy > daemon > > stats socket /var/lib/haproxy/stats > > #- > # common defaults that all the 'listen' and 'backend' sections will > # use if not designated in their block > #- > defaults > modehttp > log global > option httplog > option dontlognull > #option log-health-checks > option http-server-close > option forwardfor except 127.0.0.0/8 > option redispatch > retries 3 > timeout http-request10s > timeout queue 1m > timeout connect 10s > timeout client 1m > timeout server 1m > timeout http-keep-alive 10s > timeout check 10s > maxconn 3000 > > #- > #HAProxy Monitoring Config > #- > listen haproxy3-monitoring > bind :8080#Haproxy Monitoring run on port 8080 > mode http > option forwardfor > option httpclose > stats enable > stats show-legends > stat
Re: Will HAProxy community supports mailers section?
-11-81-R7-CLST-Node210.10.11.81:80 check I am using postfix on my machine to send emails and i have configured postfix with gmail to send emails. Could you help on it or suggest something. On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Heitepriem < daniel.heitepr...@pribas.com> wrote: > Hi Rajesh, > > the community version supports mailers. Here is a working section from > my configuration: > > mailers mymailserver > mailer smtp1 10.1.0.251:25 > > frontend frontend_CHANGEME > > bind *:443 ssl crt /opt/etc/haproxy/haproxy-t.pem force-tlsv12 no-sslv3 > > # > # backend configuration > # > > backend booking-backend > compression algo gzip > compression type text/html text/plain text/css > server server1-t server1-t:8443 check ssl verify none maxconn 4000 > > backend vakanz-backend > compression algo gzip > compression type text/html text/plain text/css application/xml > server server2-t server2-t:8080 check verify none force-tlsv12 backup > server server3-t server3-t:8443 check ssl verify none no-sslv3 > > email-alert mailers mymailserver > email-alert from haprox...@mydomain.com > email-alert to myn...@mydomain.com > > I hope it helps > > Regards, > Daniel > > Am 24.08.17 um 14:35 schrieb Rajesh Kolli: > > Hello, > > > > I am new to HAProxy, present i am using community version of haproxy, > > and i am trying to configure alerting in my configuration, after i > > configure "mailers" section and after restart of service it is > > throwing "unknown keyword mailers" in frontend. > > > > Now, my doubt is... will HAProxy community supports mailers/alerting? > > > > Thanks in advance if you suggest something on this. > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > Rajesh Kolli > > > > > -- *Thanks & RegardsRajesh Kolli*
Will HAProxy community supports mailers section?
Hello, I am new to HAProxy, present i am using community version of haproxy, and i am trying to configure alerting in my configuration, after i configure "mailers" section and after restart of service it is throwing "unknown keyword mailers" in frontend. Now, my doubt is... will HAProxy community supports mailers/alerting? Thanks in advance if you suggest something on this. Thanks and Regards Rajesh Kolli
