On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:43:58PM +0100, Martin Karbon wrote:
Quoting Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu:
Hi Willy, thanks for the fast reply
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:13:35PM +0100, Martin Karbon wrote:
Hi
I am relatively new to this great software and I am having problems
with the feature stats socket. it won't write the haproxy.stat file no
matter what. so I cannot run the socat.
r...@lb1:~# echo show stat | socat unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.stat
stdio
2009/01/21 12:12:54 socat[4887] E connect(3, AF=1
/var/run/haproxy.stat, 23): No such file or directory
I wanted to try to write some script that checks the connection
distribution every n seconds (i.e.for a monitoring tool)... any advice
for this?
I see nothing wrong in your config. It's so simple! Could you check a
few things, such as if something already exists in /var/run, if you see
a symbolic link or anything like this which might explain such a strange
behaviour.
As far as I can see no symbolic link in here...just pid files and some dirs
Also, it would be nice if you could start haproxy under strace :
# strace -o /tmp/haproxy-start.log haproxy -db -f /etc/haproxy.cfg
Then press Ctrl-C after a few seconds, and look for haproxy.stat
in the output file (or post the result here). I think we'll find
the reason there. There must be an error somewhere, or there is
something disabling the stats but I don't see what can do that.
Regards,
Willy
here is the output of the strace (note: this is a virtual machine I
have at home, same installation as the original one)
(...)
now that's rather intriguing. There's no trace of the socket at all.
Just as if the stats line was ignored.
What version of haproxy do you have ? (haproxy -vv)
Could you add an error on the stats line (insert foobar before
socket) so that you can verify haproxy complains ? If it does
not complain, could you retype the line or at least add one line
with stats foobar in order to get the parsing error ?
I'm realizing that I generally add the stats socket line
approximately as the last line of the global section. While
it would appear stupid to me, could you please move this line
at the end of the section ? Maybe there's a long standing bug
caused by another parameter clearing this one (but once again,
I'd find that a bit strange).
I prefer easily reproducible errors like this one to non-
deterministic ones !
Regards,
Willy