[H] Blue Security's Do Not Intrude Registry

[Stan Zaske]

Anybody ever hear of this Anti-SPAM tool?

http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/print/6157/

RE: [H] RE: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?

[Mark Dodge]

Rubber bands degrade quickly with heat. 


Mark Dodge
MD Computers
360-772-2433 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Reeves
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:58 PM
To: 'The Hardware List'
Subject: [H] RE: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?

I don't think it's recommended.

-Original Message-
From: Hayes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 07, 1998 11:36 PM
To: Hardware Group
Subject: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?


I don't want to use glue at the moment, so I have two cards with heat
sinks attached via rubber bands and heatsink grease ( a Voodoo1 and a
V2200).

Any body else try this? Should I expect fumes from burning rubber?

[H] Re: Matrox G200 vs Diamond G460

[Chris Shaw]

On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:10:32 GMT
Bryan Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
> 
>   Hey folks.  I just got my G200, took out my Diamond G460 w/ the i740
> chipset,
> and boy was I impressed.  Image quality is noticeably better, there are no
> artifacts,
> no pink colored buttons, this is def. a nice product.

What version of the G200 did youi install??

> 
> -B
> 
> 
>  /\/\/\   
> ( o o )  
> [--.oooO--(_)--Oooo.-]
> [Bryan G. Seitz ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )  ]
> [  University of Delaware Computer Science   ]
> [  http://hwg.linuxos.org]
> []
> 
> "Linux is like a wigwam - no windows, no gates, apache inside!"
> 

-- 
C L Shaw <>< 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today is a moment for you to clip yet another strand from 
the rope of earth, so that when he returns you won't be tied up.

RE: [H] RE: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?

[Wayne Johnson]

At 11:17 PM 2/4/2006, Chris Reeves typed:

Whoops!  I am spending the evening converting and archiving some old email,
and apparently I still had stuff in the outboxes *whoops!*  Being corrected
now.


Could you back channel me?

Thanks


--+--
   Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
 

[H] RE: HWG < 100 :))

[Chris Reeves]

I think the 300Mhz versions are due out soon.

-Original Message-
From: Andy Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 07, 1998 5:01 AM

That is unlikely to be as overclockable due to the presense of L2.

What makes the Celery so o'c able is the LACK of L2. About 30% of boxed 
Celery 266's will do 4 x 112 without problems on either the BX6/BH6 or AOpen

AX6b.


Andy

The Unofficial Abit BX6 Page
http://freespace.virgin.net/andy.drake/bx6page.htm

-THE source for BX motherboard hints, tips and overclocking tricks! 

> Not to be a bubble buster, but the Celeron 350 is not going to whoop 
> booty over the K6-240.  (3D games excluded).  I have ran a few Celeron 
> systems before sending them out the door, and they seem very sluggish 
> next to the K6 systems...  I would stick with what you have until you 
> can get a faster chip...  The Celeron 300s w/ 128k full speed cache 
> should be out soon, hold out if possible
> 
> Cody Lutsch, MCSE
> Action Computers
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [H] RE: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?

[Chris Reeves]

Whoops!  I am spending the evening converting and archiving some old email,
and apparently I still had stuff in the outboxes *whoops!*  Being corrected
now.

CW

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Johnson
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:14 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] RE: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?

Recommended or not I wouldn't do this & unless these HSs attach thru 
the mombo I don't see the need for a temp attachment anyway as most 
of the other attachment types come off easily enough.

At 10:58 PM 2/4/2006, Chris Reeves typed:
>I don't think it's recommended.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Hayes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 07, 1998 11:36 PM
>To: Hardware Group
>Subject: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?
>
>
>I don't want to use glue at the moment, so I have two cards with heat
>sinks attached via rubber bands and heatsink grease ( a Voodoo1 and a
>V2200).
>
>Any body else try this? Should I expect fumes from burning rubber?

--+--
Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
 

Re: [H] RE: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?

[Wayne Johnson]

Recommended or not I wouldn't do this & unless these HSs attach thru 
the mombo I don't see the need for a temp attachment anyway as most 
of the other attachment types come off easily enough.


At 10:58 PM 2/4/2006, Chris Reeves typed:

I don't think it's recommended.

-Original Message-
From: Hayes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 07, 1998 11:36 PM
To: Hardware Group
Subject: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?


I don't want to use glue at the moment, so I have two cards with heat
sinks attached via rubber bands and heatsink grease ( a Voodoo1 and a
V2200).

Any body else try this? Should I expect fumes from burning rubber?


--+--
   Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
 

Re: [H] Question: Virus Test Lab

[Wayne Johnson]

At 09:46 PM 2/4/2006, Chris Reeves typed:

Ok, thanks to the recent PC Mag and other articles, I've actually 
had a client ask me a question today regarding testing AV 
software.  Their Norton Corporate Contract expires soon, and they 
have been somewhat unhappy with portions of it.


He wants to setup a box, and pull a "PC Mag" and just infect it to 
all get out, make a ghost image, then see which AV software does 
better.  He's considering TrendMicro OfficeScan, Norton Again, or CA.


It's an interesting idea, but honestly; I don't much care for the 
concept of going out and "hunting for" virus files to test with.


The idea stinks because the bugs that are available today have little 
to do with whatever bugs that will be developed tomorrow also getting 
the virus definitions in a timely manner is as important as detecting the bugs.


IMNSHO this is would be a complete waste of time.


--+--
   Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
 

[H] RE: Matrox G200 vs Diamond G460

[Chris Reeves]

See, what have I been telling you?

-Original Message-
From: Bryan Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 1998 8:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Matrox G200 vs Diamond G460



  Hey folks.  I just got my G200, took out my Diamond G460 w/ the i740
chipset,
and boy was I impressed.  Image quality is noticeably better, there are no
artifacts,
no pink colored buttons, this is def. a nice product.  Jim / Curt,
interested in
the G460? ;}

-B


 /\/\/\   
( o o )  
[--.oooO--(_)--Oooo.-]
[Bryan G. Seitz ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )  ]
[  University of Delaware Computer Science   ]
[  http://hwg.linuxos.org]
[]

"Linux is like a wigwam - no windows, no gates, apache inside!"

[H] RE: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?

[Chris Reeves]

I don't think it's recommended.

-Original Message-
From: Hayes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 07, 1998 11:36 PM
To: Hardware Group
Subject: rubber bands safe for attaching heatsinks?


I don't want to use glue at the moment, so I have two cards with heat
sinks attached via rubber bands and heatsink grease ( a Voodoo1 and a
V2200).

Any body else try this? Should I expect fumes from burning rubber?

Re: [H] External USB 2.0 enclosure recommendations.

[Jin-Wei Tioh]

At 09:06 PM 2/4/2006, you wrote:


Hey all,

I just got a 200GB drive to use as an external backup drive.  What are the 
some of the recommended external enclosure units.  I am looking for good 
quality, good chipset, and good heat dissipation.


Thanks,
Bobby


I'll need to check up further to get specific brands but what you want to 
look for

is a fanless aluminum 3.5" case that makes snug contact with the drive and
you pretty much want the Cypress chipset for USB2.0 or Oxford for Firewire.

HTH

--
JW 

[H] External USB 2.0 enclosure recommendations.

[Bobby Heid]

Title: External USB 2.0 enclosure recommendations.






Hey all,


I just got a 200GB drive to use as an external backup drive.  What are the some of the recommended external enclosure units.  I am looking for good quality, good chipset, and good heat dissipation.

Thanks,

Bobby

[H] Question: Virus Test Lab

[Chris Reeves]

Ok, thanks to the recent PC Mag and other articles, I’ve
actually had a client ask me a question today regarding testing AV software. 
Their Norton Corporate Contract expires soon, and they have been somewhat
unhappy with portions of it.

 

He wants to setup a box, and pull a “PC Mag” and
just infect it to all get out, make a ghost image, then see which AV software
does better.  He’s considering TrendMicro OfficeScan, Norton Again, or
CA.

 

It’s an interesting idea, but honestly; I don’t
much care for the concept of going out and “hunting for” virus
files to test with.

 

Has this ever come up anywhere else and been tested?

Re: [hardware] Re: [H] Remote traceroute?

[Steve]

Thanks very much!
cheers

- Original Message - 
From: "Bryan Seitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "The Hardware List" 
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 1:07 PM
Subject: [hardware] Re: [H] Remote traceroute?



On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:48:20PM +1100, Steve wrote:

Many moons ago there was a site somwhere in the US where I could do a
traceback to my computer. I've lost the link & Google is throwing up 
zilch.

Anyone know of this site or something similar?


http://www.traceroute.org/

--

Bryan G. Seitz

Re: [H] Remote traceroute?

[Bryan Seitz]

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:48:20PM +1100, Steve wrote:
> Many moons ago there was a site somwhere in the US where I could do a 
> traceback to my computer. I've lost the link & Google is throwing up zilch. 
> Anyone know of this site or something similar?

http://www.traceroute.org/

-- 
 
Bryan G. Seitz

[H] Remote traceroute?

[Steve]

Many moons ago there was a site somwhere in the US where I could do a 
traceback to my computer. I've lost the link & Google is throwing up zilch. 
Anyone know of this site or something similar?
cheers 

Re: [H] eudora 7 ?

[FORC5]

did it, really haven't seen any difference but I did not ready the readme file. 
guess I should to know what is new. :-!
fp

At 08:05 PM 2/3/2006, dhs Poked the stick with:

>Okay. So, the consensus is
> "OK" or 
>"YMMV" or
>"NRFPT?"
>I am confused, again, by the responses.
>Thanks.
>Duncan
>
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:26 , Wayne Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>>
>>At 08:46 PM 2/1/2006, FORC5 typed:
>>>they maybe moved the ini file or put the info in the registry, 
>>>either way doesn't bother me.
>>
>>One thing they added the cute little icons substitution thing for 
>>emoticons such as ;-).  If you have Eudora 7 that will have turned 
>>into a happy face winky automagically.
>>
>>
>>--+--
>>Wayne D. Johnson
>>Ashland, OH, USA 44805
>>http://www.wavijo.com> 
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net 

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Yes-men: Fellows who hang around the man nobody noes.

Re: [H] What's fastest ?

[Zulfiqar Naushad]

Why not one of them dual core dual opteron badboys?

I am sure they would be good for SQL.

--- Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Am building a database server for SQL Server 2005
> Enterprise edition.  OS 
> will be Windows 2003 Server Enterprise edition. 
> Server is probably going to 
> be a Dell 6850 
>
(http://www1.euro.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/pedge_6850?c=uk&l=en&s=lca&~tab=specstab#tabtop)
> 
> Although I can get older IBM servers (hence the 4MB
> L3 cache option below) 
> for a very good price.
> 
> Basic spec is 4 CPU's, 24 GB of RAM and an external
> disk array.  Just 
> wondering how much performance difference there is
> between the followoing 
> CPU's:
> 
> 4 x Xeon MP 3.0 GHz 4MB L3 cache (400 MHz FSB ?)
> 4 x Xeon MP 3.0 GHz 8 MB L3 cache (667 MHz FSB)
> 4 x Xeon 3.6 GHz 1 MB L2 cache
> 4 x Xeon dual core 2.6 GHz 2 x 1 MB L2 cache
> 
> My gut reaction says the 8 MB L3 cache chips will be
> faster than even the 
> dual core chips in real world performance.  Anybody
> else have a view ?
> 
> Thanks, Steve 
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [H] eudora 7 ?

[dhs]

Okay. So, the consensus is
 "OK" or 
"YMMV" or
"NRFPT?"
I am confused, again, by the responses.
Thanks.
Duncan

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:26 , Wayne Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
>At 08:46 PM 2/1/2006, FORC5 typed:
>>they maybe moved the ini file or put the info in the registry, 
>>either way doesn't bother me.
>
>One thing they added the cute little icons substitution thing for 
>emoticons such as ;-).  If you have Eudora 7 that will have turned 
>into a happy face winky automagically.
>
>
>--+--
>Wayne D. Johnson
>Ashland, OH, USA 44805
>http://www.wavijo.com> 
>





This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net