Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-12 Thread j maccraw
LOL!

Thane Sherrington wrote:
> At 02:39 AM 10/05/2008, Gary VanderMolen wrote:
>> those are uninstalled, the mail program starts
working again.
>> AVG and Avast are some of the antivirus products
that seldom cause
>> trouble.
> 
> AVG probably doesn't cause any problems because it
isn't doing much. :)  
> Avast is a nice product.
> 
> T
> 
> 
> 


  


Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-12 Thread j maccraw
It's popular because it's the most common bloat-ware
shipped on new PC's these days!

SAVCE is what I am using but would consider NOD32 or
Kapersky or nothing before I'd 
go anywhere near a McAwful product. Been of that mind
about MA for over 10 years in fact.

Unless you have a business need for Outlook, and even
then I'd use it only for the 
specific business need not normal email, Thunderbird
is much better & free.

Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
> This is an interesting conversation.  You guys are
always jumping me 
> when I say thing about how IT pros act like gods on
PCs in corps. Well, 
> ITs are the ones who influence the selection of such
software.  
> Obviously, IT pros are NOT of one opinion on what's
good and what's not. 
> Personally, I've never liked McAfee. It doesn't even
seem to make sense 
> in terms of how to use it. But it's free to me.  And
other than this 
> problem with Outlook (which, is likely the source of
the problem 
> anyway), it's been working fine for months.
> 
> BTW, this is VirusScan Enterprise 8.0.0.
> 



  


Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-10 Thread Robert Martin Jr.
I used to like AVG when it was still nice and lean (about 4 yrs ago or so), but 
tend to use and recommend avast these days. There was a time when avg caught 
more virii than the commercial programs. I think maxpc had a av lineup

lopaka

Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 02:39 AM 10/05/2008, Gary 
VanderMolen wrote:
>those are uninstalled, the mail program starts working again.
>AVG and Avast are some of the antivirus products that seldom cause
>trouble.

AVG probably doesn't cause any problems because it isn't doing much. 
:)  Avast is a nice product.

T 





Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-10 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 02:39 AM 10/05/2008, Gary VanderMolen wrote:

those are uninstalled, the mail program starts working again.
AVG and Avast are some of the antivirus products that seldom cause
trouble.


AVG probably doesn't cause any problems because it isn't doing much. 
:)  Avast is a nice product.


T 





Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Gary VanderMolen

I'm not just expressing an opinion.  For the past 15 months I've been
working as one of the primary support responders on Microsoft's
newsgroup microsoft.public.windows.vista.mail . (Put my name
in a Google search and you'll get about 39,000 hits in that capacity.)
You know what the primary cause of email problems is? Mail
programs corrupted by McAfee and Norton antivirus. As soon as
those are uninstalled, the mail program starts working again.
AVG and Avast are some of the antivirus products that seldom cause
trouble.

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP

--
From: "Robert Martin Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


I'd have to agree with Gary on this one. If you gave me a lifetime 
subscription to McAfee, I would still never put it on any of my personal 
windows boxes. I've had to fix so many boxes where mcafee was the primary 
problem, that I will never use it again.


I use avast, avg and or clamwin

lopaka

"Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's a ridiculous 
analogy, Gary.  There are plenty who consider even

McAfee suitable to the task it purports to do.
Would I buy it? No...Do I wish my employer would get something else,
yes. Do I get to demand what they purchase? No.

Gary VanderMolen wrote:

I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
Would you eat free food that is spoiled?

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP


--
From: "Anthony Q. Martin"

:)

Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and
work on all of my PCs...

Al wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
"Gary VanderMolen"  wrote:


Get rid of McAfee! 




Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Hayes Elkins

My famous quote:

"The only consistency in the computer hardware/software industry is 
inconsistency."

True for AV. For a span of 7 years, the king antivirus solution was Symantec's 
AV corporate edition (not to be confused with the dogshit product with a 
"Norton" label). Low and behold, Symantec cooks a turkey called "Endpoint 
Protection v11" and 2 major revisions later it's still an epic failure. McAfee 
had a surge of popularity in the mid 90s in part because it was a simple to use 
product that ran figure 8's around Norton. Somehow it became a bloated, 
unreliable disaster and hasn't really shaken that image after numerous 
acquisitions - but I'll say this...McAfee WILL be king again, if only for a 
year or two. Grand opportunity for all players involved now that Symantec is 
still wiping egg off their red faces.



> Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:18:17 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows
>
> That's a ridiculous analogy, Gary. There are plenty who consider even
> McAfee suitable to the task it purports to do.
> Would I buy it? No...Do I wish my employer would get something else,
> yes. Do I get to demand what they purchase? No.
>
> Gary VanderMolen wrote:
>> I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
>> Would you eat free food that is spoiled?
>>
>> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP
>>
>>
>> --
>> From: "Anthony Q. Martin" 
>>> :)
>>>
>>> Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and
>>> work on all of my PCs...
>>>
>>> Al wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
>>>> "Gary VanderMolen"  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Get rid of McAfee!
>>
>>

_
Windows Live SkyDrive lets you share files with faraway friends.
http://www.windowslive.com/skydrive/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_skydrive_052008

Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Robert Martin Jr.
To be fair the enterprise version has seemed to be a different beast and has 
for the most part, worked OK. Our corporate office used to use mcafee but my 
dept boxes are built by me.

lopaka

"Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is an interesting 
conversation.  You guys are always jumping me 
when I say thing about how IT pros act like gods on PCs in corps. Well, 
ITs are the ones who influence the selection of such software.  
Obviously, IT pros are NOT of one opinion on what's good and what's not. 
Personally, I've never liked McAfee. It doesn't even seem to make sense 
in terms of how to use it. But it's free to me.  And other than this 
problem with Outlook (which, is likely the source of the problem 
anyway), it's been working fine for months.

BTW, this is VirusScan Enterprise 8.0.0.

Robert Martin Jr. wrote:
> I'd have to agree with Gary on this one. If you gave me a lifetime 
> subscription to McAfee, I would still never put it on any of my personal 
> windows boxes. I've had to fix so many boxes where mcafee was the primary 
> problem, that I will never use it again.
>
> I use avast, avg and or clamwin
>
> lopaka
>
> "Anthony Q. Martin"  wrote: That's a ridiculous analogy, Gary.  There are 
> plenty who consider even 
> McAfee suitable to the task it purports to do.
> Would I buy it? No...Do I wish my employer would get something else, 
> yes. Do I get to demand what they purchase? No.
>
> Gary VanderMolen wrote:
>   
>> I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
>> Would you eat free food that is spoiled?
>>
>> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP
>>
>>
>> --
>> From: "Anthony Q. Martin" 
>> 
>>> :)
>>>
>>> Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and 
>>> work on all of my PCs...
>>>
>>> Al wrote:
>>>   
 On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
 "Gary VanderMolen"  wrote:


 
> Get rid of McAfee! 
>   
>> 
>
>
>   



Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
This is an interesting conversation.  You guys are always jumping me 
when I say thing about how IT pros act like gods on PCs in corps. Well, 
ITs are the ones who influence the selection of such software.  
Obviously, IT pros are NOT of one opinion on what's good and what's not. 
Personally, I've never liked McAfee. It doesn't even seem to make sense 
in terms of how to use it. But it's free to me.  And other than this 
problem with Outlook (which, is likely the source of the problem 
anyway), it's been working fine for months.


BTW, this is VirusScan Enterprise 8.0.0.

Robert Martin Jr. wrote:

I'd have to agree with Gary on this one. If you gave me a lifetime subscription 
to McAfee, I would still never put it on any of my personal windows boxes. I've 
had to fix so many boxes where mcafee was the primary problem, that I will 
never use it again.

I use avast, avg and or clamwin

lopaka

"Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's a ridiculous analogy, Gary.  There are plenty who consider even 
McAfee suitable to the task it purports to do.
Would I buy it? No...Do I wish my employer would get something else, 
yes. Do I get to demand what they purchase? No.


Gary VanderMolen wrote:
  

I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
Would you eat free food that is spoiled?

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP


--
From: "Anthony Q. Martin" 


:)

Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and 
work on all of my PCs...


Al wrote:
  

On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
"Gary VanderMolen"  wrote:



Get rid of McAfee! 
  




  


Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Robert Martin Jr.
I'd have to agree with Gary on this one. If you gave me a lifetime subscription 
to McAfee, I would still never put it on any of my personal windows boxes. I've 
had to fix so many boxes where mcafee was the primary problem, that I will 
never use it again.

I use avast, avg and or clamwin

lopaka

"Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's a ridiculous analogy, 
Gary.  There are plenty who consider even 
McAfee suitable to the task it purports to do.
Would I buy it? No...Do I wish my employer would get something else, 
yes. Do I get to demand what they purchase? No.

Gary VanderMolen wrote:
> I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
> Would you eat free food that is spoiled?
>
> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP
>
>
> --
> From: "Anthony Q. Martin" 
>> :)
>>
>> Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and 
>> work on all of my PCs...
>>
>> Al wrote:
>>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
>>> "Gary VanderMolen"  wrote:
>>>
>>>
 Get rid of McAfee! 
>
>



Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread FORC5
Bill does >:-}
fp

At 05:24 PM 5/9/2008, Thane Sherrington Poked the stick with:
>At 09:11 PM 09/05/2008, Wayne Johnson wrote:
>>At 07:47 PM 5/9/2008, Thane Sherrington typed:
>>>is more like a Big Mac than spoiled food - it adds bloat, makes you ill, and 
>>>lots of people think it's great. :)
>>
>>Sounds like you're describing Windows Vista to me.
>
>Nobody thinks Vista is great. :)
>
>T 

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Hummingbirds never remember the words to songs.



Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 09:11 PM 09/05/2008, Wayne Johnson wrote:

At 07:47 PM 5/9/2008, Thane Sherrington typed:
is more like a Big Mac than spoiled food - it adds bloat, makes you 
ill, and lots of people think it's great. :)


Sounds like you're describing Windows Vista to me.


Nobody thinks Vista is great. :)

T 





Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 07:18 PM 09/05/2008, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
That's a ridiculous analogy, Gary.  There are plenty who consider 
even McAfee suitable to the task it purports to do.
Would I buy it? No...Do I wish my employer would get something else, 
yes. Do I get to demand what they purchase? No.


The people who think that are wrong.  Even the daily tests of McAfee 
shows it to be deficient.  It slows the machine and causes odd 
problems.  It's among the worst for false positives (and stupid ones 
at that - I've seen it flag batch files I wrote as malware (and I'm 
not that good.) :)  I think the analogy is almost perfect - but 
McAfee is more like a Big Mac than spoiled food - it adds bloat, 
makes you ill, and lots of people think it's great. :)


T 





Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 06:16 PM 09/05/2008, Gary VanderMolen wrote:

I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
Would you eat free food that is spoiled?


You are totally correct.  I've never seen such a crappy product that 
has been crappy for such a long period of time but is still for 
sale.  I wish McAfee would close up shop and go away.


T 





Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
That's a ridiculous analogy, Gary.  There are plenty who consider even 
McAfee suitable to the task it purports to do.
Would I buy it? No...Do I wish my employer would get something else, 
yes. Do I get to demand what they purchase? No.


Gary VanderMolen wrote:

I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
Would you eat free food that is spoiled?

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP


--
From: "Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

:)

Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and 
work on all of my PCs...


Al wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
"Gary VanderMolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Get rid of McAfee! 





Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Gary VanderMolen

I wouldn't put McAfee on my PC if they paid me to do so.
Would you eat free food that is spoiled?

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP


--
From: "Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

:)

Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and work 
on all of my PCs...


Al wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
"Gary VanderMolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Get rid of McAfee! 




Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Anthony Q. Martin

:)

Well...I did think of that...but I get both free...for both home and 
work on all of my PCs...


Al wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
"Gary VanderMolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  

Get rid of McAfee!



And Outlook  ;-)
  


Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Al

On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:32:21 -0700
"Gary VanderMolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Get rid of McAfee!

And Outlook  ;-)
-- 
Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" 
-- Sir Arthur C. Clarke 



Re: [H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Gary VanderMolen

Get rid of McAfee!

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP

--
From: "Anthony Q. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Every time I close Outlook, I get these damn notices from McAfee 
identifying bo:heap and a buffer overflow message.


What can I do to rid myself of this? 




[H] Outlook & McAfee VirusScan Buffer Overflows

2008-05-09 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
Every time I close Outlook, I get these damn notices from McAfee 
identifying bo:heap and a buffer overflow message.


What can I do to rid myself of this?