Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-16 Thread Tim Ellison
Just to be clear that you are referring to moving [1] from enhanced to
standard?  If I understood that right, then +1.

[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/

Regards,
Tim

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
 there.
 
 Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
 completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.
 
 geir
 

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.


Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-16 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Tim Ellison wrote:
 Just to be clear that you are referring to moving [1] from enhanced to
 standard?  If I understood that right, then +1.
 
 [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/

+1 as well

 
 Regards,
 Tim
 
 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
 there.

 Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
 completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.

 geir

 

-- 
Stefano.



Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-16 Thread Weldon Washburn

On 11/16/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Just to be clear that you are referring to moving [1] from enhanced to
standard?  If I understood that right, then +1.



+1, same assumptions as Tim.

[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/


Regards,
Tim

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
 there.

 Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
 completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.

 geir


--

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.





--
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division


Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-16 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

Just curious... what else could it be?

Weldon Washburn wrote:

On 11/16/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Just to be clear that you are referring to moving [1] from enhanced to
standard?  If I understood that right, then +1.



+1, same assumptions as Tim.

[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/


Regards,
Tim

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
 there.

 Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
 completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.

 geir


--

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.







Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-16 Thread Tim Ellison
Well the subject line was build-test (not the actual directory name) and
you talk about the testing framework -- so just being clear that you are
not talking about the JUnit test suites/structure.

Regards,
Tim

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 Just curious... what else could it be?
 
 Weldon Washburn wrote:
 On 11/16/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Just to be clear that you are referring to moving [1] from enhanced to
 standard?  If I understood that right, then +1.


 +1, same assumptions as Tim.

 [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/

 Regards,
 Tim

 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
  Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what
 goes in
  there.
 
  Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
  completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.
 
  geir
 

 -- 

 Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 IBM Java technology centre, UK.




 

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.


Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-16 Thread Nathan Beyer

+1 go for it

On 11/16/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Well the subject line was build-test (not the actual directory name) and
you talk about the testing framework -- so just being clear that you are
not talking about the JUnit test suites/structure.

Regards,
Tim

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 Just curious... what else could it be?

 Weldon Washburn wrote:
 On 11/16/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Just to be clear that you are referring to moving [1] from enhanced to
 standard?  If I understood that right, then +1.


 +1, same assumptions as Tim.

 [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/

 Regards,
 Tim

 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
  Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what
 goes in
  there.
 
  Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
  completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.
 
  geir
 

 --

 Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 IBM Java technology centre, UK.






--

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.



[build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-15 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in 
there.


Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is 
completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.


geir


Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

2006-11-15 Thread Mikhail Loenko

+1

2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Does anyone care?  This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
there.

Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.

geir