RE: Harmful spammers

2001-10-15 Thread Simon Marlow


 There are a couple things to do that can at least cut down on spam.
 
 1) Make sure that your mail gateway, or (in this case) the mailing 
list host is not an open relay site.

It isn't.

 2) Every time you get spam, locate all the hosts it came through
in the header.

Or alternatively just report it using Spamcop (http://spamcop.net) or
some other reporting tool.  Life is just too short to do this by hand
every time you get spam.

On the Haskell mailing list we have a good compromise at the moment: the
mailing list software's auto-filtering catches most of the spam (not
allowing Bcc's to the list is a good one), and for any spam that gets
through I just add it to the list of disallowed addresses.  I asked
recently if we should move to allowing subscriber-only posting, and I
got a small number of responses, which were split roughly 50/50 so no
action was taken.

Cheers,
Simon

___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell



Re: Harmful spammers

2001-10-15 Thread Andre W B Furtado

 Or alternatively just report it using Spamcop (http://spamcop.net) or
 some other reporting tool.  Life is just too short to do this by hand
 every time you get spam.

CAUCE (The Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email) seems to me a
nice alternative. Check www.cauce.org.

 On the Haskell mailing list we have a good compromise at the moment: the
 mailing list software's auto-filtering catches most of the spam (not
 allowing Bcc's to the list is a good one), and for any spam that gets
 through I just add it to the list of disallowed addresses.  I asked
 recently if we should move to allowing subscriber-only posting, and I
 got a small number of responses, which were split roughly 50/50 so no
 action was taken.

I think moving the list to allowing subscriber-only posting may cause some
trouble to the subscribers too... (now there isn't a 50/50 split anymore
)  )

Andre W B Furtado
Recife - Brazil
www.cin.ufpe.br/~haskell/hopengl/


___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell



Harmful spammers

2001-10-10 Thread Jerzy Karczmarczuk

Sorry for the pollution.

Is there a way  to kill the guys from: @bid4placement.com ?

They managed already 3 times to block my mailer with their HTML,
via Haskell list.


Jerzy Karczmarczuk
Caen, France

___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell



Re: Harmful spammers

2001-10-10 Thread jefu


There are a couple things to do that can at least cut down on spam.

1) Make sure that your mail gateway, or (in this case) the mailing 
   list host is not an open relay site.  Check 

   http://www.mail-abuse.net/

   and especially 

   http://www.mail-abuse.net/rss/

   for more information.


2) Every time you get spam, locate all the hosts it came through
   in the header.  Check both hostnames and ip addresses as one 
   of the common spammer techniques is to give a different hostname
   than the ip address maps to.  These are in the Recieved-by:
   headers.  Then send mail to everyone reasonable at the site you
   get.   If there are any mail addresses in the body of the
   message, add them too - similarly with web addresses. 

   Given a site name of foo.bar.com, my usual list of
   addresses is :
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   I have a program to generate this list, as often I send mail 
   to several sites at a time.  

   In that mail, complain about the spam and include the entire
   mail message that you got (including the headers).(If I
   get really bugged - for example by getting the same spam over
   and over again, I'll often include a huge image file that
   contains the text SPAM IS BAD just for amusement.  This
   technique is for experienced drivers on closed courses only.
   Don't try this at home.) 

   If your MUA supports changing your Reply-To: and From: 
   headers, change them to something nonsensical.  
   Ignore mail bounces. 

   Often the sysadmins will do their best to fix the problem,
   however, many recent spams have originated in China and
   they don't seem to be doing much to change that. 
   
jefu 
-- 
jeff putnam -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://cs.eou.edu/~jefu



___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell



Re: Harmful spammers

2001-10-10 Thread Ketil Malde

jefu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 2) Every time you get spam, locate all the hosts it came through
in the header.  Check both hostnames and ip addresses as one 
of the common spammer techniques is to give a different hostname
than the ip address maps to.  

Note that spammers add dummy entries to the Received: list.  The
server previous from your trusted maildrop is usually the one to
address. 

Given a site name of foo.bar.com, my usual list of
addresses is :

You can also look up people responsible for the domain with the 'whois'
command.  Many places simply seem to ignore mail sent to
e.g. postmaster, but people in the whois database tend to be real. 

In that mail, complain about the spam and include the entire
mail message that you got (including the headers).(If I
get really bugged - for example by getting the same spam over
and over again, I'll often include a huge image file that

I'd advise against that.  A polite complaint is in order, but there's
no need to be deliberately nasty.  And there's also a good chance
you're hitting the wrong persons, and/or alienating those with power
to deal with the spammer.

-kzm
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell